Why would you say that? He's a personal trainer, and he's been incredibly supportive of her through this whole ordeal. He also publicly spoke out in support of Cassie after the video came out.Anonymous wrote:Is her lifestyle one of someone who just got $30 million cash? Hard to conceal that sort of windfall. That's like winning a $100 million lottery ticket. And isn't her husband a bum?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
I don’t follow your “logic”. This trial is not about what she she sued/settled for. What she settled for is not a federal crime like this trial. She’s testifying about other crimes he committed.
If you pay someone $30 million cash, that's to shut up and have amnesia moving forward. Who pays $30 million so you can turn around and spill the beans to get me locked up for the rest of my life? Why would he pay her a cent?
Because he thought he'd never get caught/charged with a crime/ go to jail. That's why.
+1
He settled before he was federally charged. He thought it was all going away after he settled.
She is brave as shit. Discussing the details that are horrific knowing her children will be able to read them one day. This woman has been through so many terrible things, and I commend her for helping to put him behind bars for the rest of his life.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
I don’t follow your “logic”. This trial is not about what she she sued/settled for. What she settled for is not a federal crime like this trial. She’s testifying about other crimes he committed.
If you pay someone $30 million cash, that's to shut up and have amnesia moving forward. Who pays $30 million so you can turn around and spill the beans to get me locked up for the rest of my life? Why would he pay her a cent?
Because he thought he'd never get caught/charged with a crime/ go to jail. That's why.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
I don’t follow your “logic”. This trial is not about what she she sued/settled for. What she settled for is not a federal crime like this trial. She’s testifying about other crimes he committed.
If you pay someone $30 million cash, that's to shut up and have amnesia moving forward. Who pays $30 million so you can turn around and spill the beans to get me locked up for the rest of my life? Why would he pay her a cent?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
I don’t follow your “logic”. This trial is not about what she she sued/settled for. What she settled for is not a federal crime like this trial. She’s testifying about other crimes he committed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
I don't think any of that information was made public.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Has it ever been revealed if she actually collected the money she settled for? I don't understand how he gave him tens of millions (?) and she's here testifying against him? I'm guessing she did NOT collect all that money and he already skipped the first or second installment. Usually such an NDA is over 10 years.
Anonymous wrote:^^ Oops, I forgot the picture of her.
Im now seeing that once the 2nd witness took the stand, the male escort, and he started describing sexual acts with Cassie while Combs watched, that all 3 of his daughters left the courtroom and returned later. But left again once testimony started again from the male escort. I assume they also left again today; Cassie is currently on the stand.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's sick that his children are sitting in that courtroom listening to this. His team should have insisted that they leave the courtroom as soon as testimony started. He probably thinks this makes him look like a good family man, but I bet every juror thinks it's awful that his kids are hearing the graphic testimony, not to mention the videos that are supposed to be shown.
All but one of his kids are 18 or over. I’m sure the toddler isn’t there. Maybe they should hear it to learn how sick their father is.