Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 18:00     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Christofascism doesn’t care that their policies are insanely unpopular.


Kyle Griffin is just on top of things, isn’t he!
Anonymous
Post 09/22/2022 17:33     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 14:56     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Robert Burns, running for Congress from New Hampshire, proposes death panels for pregnant women.


In your dreams new hampshire. What pregnant women will tolerate that kind of treatment?
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 14:44     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Robert Burns, running for Congress from New Hampshire, proposes death panels for pregnant women.
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 14:38     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Michigan AG candidate wants to outlaw Plan B

Where are all the dear little forced birthers who said this was fringe, this would never happen? Where are they all?
Anonymous
Post 09/21/2022 14:19     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Michigan AG candidate wants to outlaw Plan B
Anonymous
Post 09/20/2022 19:23     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Actually, the red states are coming for ALL women, via the federal government. The right wing of the GOP already controls the Supreme Court. If they get the legislative and executive branches most women can kiss a number of rights goodbye, including their right to treat their own bodies. Except for the really wealthy women, who will just fly to other countries.

The wealthy apparently need more poor people to pay low salaries and give crap benefits, and they don't want to pay those people to learn English.

Even that would be in question. You know they’d be stopping the daughters of their political enemies at the airport and forcing them to submit to pregnancy tests upon leaving and entering.


Probably not. They would let each other get away with it, and rich Republicans would scream about individual rights if caught. I mean, how has it been for Democrats to try to hold Republicans accountable for the past year?

For the rest of us, it will be do as we say, not as we do..

Well yeah, that’s what I’m saying. The GOP ladies would be able to sneak in and out of the country; Democratic women would be stopped if they were sufficiently famous.
Anonymous
Post 09/19/2022 15:10     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Actually, the red states are coming for ALL women, via the federal government. The right wing of the GOP already controls the Supreme Court. If they get the legislative and executive branches most women can kiss a number of rights goodbye, including their right to treat their own bodies. Except for the really wealthy women, who will just fly to other countries.

The wealthy apparently need more poor people to pay low salaries and give crap benefits, and they don't want to pay those people to learn English.

Even that would be in question. You know they’d be stopping the daughters of their political enemies at the airport and forcing them to submit to pregnancy tests upon leaving and entering.


Probably not. They would let each other get away with it, and rich Republicans would scream about individual rights if caught. I mean, how has it been for Democrats to try to hold Republicans accountable for the past year?

For the rest of us, it will be do as we say, not as we do..
Anonymous
Post 09/18/2022 17:48     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Actually, the red states are coming for ALL women, via the federal government. The right wing of the GOP already controls the Supreme Court. If they get the legislative and executive branches most women can kiss a number of rights goodbye, including their right to treat their own bodies. Except for the really wealthy women, who will just fly to other countries.

The wealthy apparently need more poor people to pay low salaries and give crap benefits, and they don't want to pay those people to learn English.

Even that would be in question. You know they’d be stopping the daughters of their political enemies at the airport and forcing them to submit to pregnancy tests upon leaving and entering.
Anonymous
Post 09/18/2022 16:53     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Actually, the red states are coming for ALL women, via the federal government. The right wing of the GOP already controls the Supreme Court. If they get the legislative and executive branches most women can kiss a number of rights goodbye, including their right to treat their own bodies. Except for the really wealthy women, who will just fly to other countries.

The wealthy apparently need more poor people to pay low salaries and give crap benefits, and they don't want to pay those people to learn English.
Anonymous
Post 09/18/2022 14:33     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Aw, more "but I didn't want you to eat FACES!"

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/09/08/south-carolina-republican-abortion-rape/?utm_source=reddit.com

Such tedious people. What did they think would be the logical outcome of their policies at their most extreme, which is where they’ve been going for years? Did they think things would magically be fixed?
Anonymous
Post 09/18/2022 14:03     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:Relax ladies, red states are not coming for you.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/xh5acr/women_gets_arrested_for_wearing_at_thong_bikini/


They have nothing better to do? Get everyone..men and women.... down on that beach in a thong.
Anonymous
Post 09/18/2022 13:28     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 09/17/2022 16:22     Subject: Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous
Post 09/17/2022 13:38     Subject: Re:Roe v Wade struck down

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Christofascism doesn’t care that their policies are insanely unpopular.


Jebus says fck the heathens.

As has been pointed out endlessly, all of the christofascists are the heathens. None of their politics or their personal beliefs have anything to do with the the New Testament where Jesus’s teachings live, and they manage to mangle the intention of the Old Testament, too. People of the Jewish faith have used that book for two thousand years and largely continue to practice their religion with love and intention, but the fundies, the evangelicals, the conservative Catholics? They’re Christian-identified, but not Christians. They are contrary to the teachings of the man they profess to follow.