Anonymous wrote:Lets call it mid-season and I have seen more than a few games live and via stream.

In looking at NOVA, as I have not really followed the southern teams, a few things stand out:

Riverside and Indy are by far the top two teams and by a wide margin.

The next class includes teams like Madison, Stone Bridge, Battlefield and maybe, just maybe Robo (if they can really start to score).

I would tend to put Robo at the top of the next group down, to include YT, WS, Chantilly, etc.

Langley for all the preseason hype is not a good team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4/14 Predictions

Battlefield 11, Oakton 2
Langley 12, McLean 7
Yorktown 13, W-L 1

LaxNumbers' RPI:

Battlefield 9, Oakton 4
Langley 10, McLean 6
Yorktown 11, W-L 4

HUMAN:

Battlefield 11, Oakton 2
Langley 12, McLean 7
Yorktown 13, W-L 1

LAXNUMBERS' RPI:

Battlefield 9, Oakton 4
Langley 10, McLean 6
Yorktown 11, W-L 4

RESULTS:

* Battlefield 12, Oakton 5 - Human much closer on the winner but off on loser. That's the clear trend. LaxNumbers closer on loser.

* Langley 5, McLean 4 - Both missed hard on the total, but got the winner right again. Human overshot on winner and loser goals, LN was closest.

* Yorktown 19, W-L 7 - Trends persist, both got the winner right, human closer on total but miss on loser. LN closer overall but missed the winner by a good bit.

Mclean beat Langley 5-4, so both Human and LN got it wrong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4/14 Predictions

Battlefield 11, Oakton 2
Langley 12, McLean 7
Yorktown 13, W-L 1

LaxNumbers' RPI:

Battlefield 9, Oakton 4
Langley 10, McLean 6
Yorktown 11, W-L 4

HUMAN:

Battlefield 11, Oakton 2
Langley 12, McLean 7
Yorktown 13, W-L 1

LAXNUMBERS' RPI:

Battlefield 9, Oakton 4
Langley 10, McLean 6
Yorktown 11, W-L 4

RESULTS:

* Battlefield 12, Oakton 5 - Human much closer on the winner but off on loser. That's the clear trend. LaxNumbers closer on loser.

* Langley 5, McLean 4 - Both missed hard on the total, but got the winner right again. Human overshot on winner and loser goals, LN was closest.

* Yorktown 19, W-L 7 - Trends persist, both got the winner right, human closer on total but miss on loser. LN closer overall but missed the winner by a good bit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:4/14 Predictions

Battlefield 11, Oakton 2
Langley 12, McLean 7
Yorktown 13, W-L 1

LaxNumbers' RPI:

Battlefield 9, Oakton 4
Langley 10, McLean 6
Yorktown 11, W-L 4

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Robo scored more than Madison… Food for thought.

If only those two teams had played either other so we knew who would win an actual and not hypothetical matchup . . .

Right, because when Team A beats Team B by one goal, Team B could never beat Team A in a rematch. Never happpened before

Wow, so much energy being spent deciding who is second behind Indy.

Third? Behind Indy and Cosby.

I’ve never heard of Cosby, who have they beaten?

Go look it up. Why do people spend more time typing up requests like this when they can find the information themselves?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did Herndon really beat Wakefield by 26 goals? If that's the case, really poor form from the coaching staff! I hope they pulled the starters and it was JV call ups who were scoring.

Herndon has been on the other side of a lot of these through the years so I think a little grace can be given here. These types of games are difficult to manage and like anything else in life take practice. The first quarter got away from them a little 11 or 12 goals. After that coaches did a good job to subbing guys in a really spreading the scoring out but they.

Anonymous wrote:Did Herndon really beat Wakefield by 26 goals? If that's the case, really poor form from the coaching staff! I hope they pulled the starters and it was JV call ups who were scoring.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If true, that is a terrible loss.

Maybe McLean is better than they looked early in the season?

Anonymous wrote:Did Herndon really beat Wakefield by 26 goals? If that's the case, really poor form from the coaching staff! I hope they pulled the starters and it was JV call ups who were scoring.

Anonymous wrote:If true, that is a terrible loss.