Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:SR playing on a different level now. SR will win; although rain may limit the margin.
To go undefeated, a lot of things need to go right, no matter how good you are. That's why the #1 regular season team hasn't won the tournament in a few years.
Anonymous wrote:SR playing on a different level now. SR will win; although rain may limit the margin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Let's get some new lines going:
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
You need to get a schedule.
Typo? Would you give me that? Let's try this:
1. SR vs. Potomac (SR -8)
2. SSSAS vs Visi (SSSAS -4)
Do no be surprised if Potomac advances.
Zero change Potomac wins
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Let's get some new lines going:
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
You need to get a schedule.
Typo? Would you give me that? Let's try this:
1. SR vs. Potomac (SR -8)
2. SSSAS vs Visi (SSSAS -4)
Do no be surprised if Potomac advances.
Zero change Potomac wins
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Let's get some new lines going:
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
You need to get a schedule.
Typo? Would you give me that? Let's try this:
1. SR vs. Potomac (SR -8)
2. SSSAS vs Visi (SSSAS -4)
Do no be surprised if Potomac advances.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Let's get some new lines going:
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
You need to get a schedule.
Typo? Would you give me that? Let's try this:
1. SR vs. Potomac (SR -8)
2. SSSAS vs Visi (SSSAS -4)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.
I agree with that. Losing those seniors is a significant issue that goes well beyond just scoring, but if we focus solely on points, I'd say that Visi already distributes scoring well enough that they'll have options next year. It's worth noting that all the Big 4 teams are losing key senior scorers. Supporters of other teams might believe their pipelines are strong enough to compete next year. However, they may not fully appreciate what the Big 4 have lined up, which is likely better than expected. Therefore, I would not expect any changes in the makeup of the Big 4 next year.
Do they all have a good pipeline of 2030s coming in?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Let's get some new lines going:
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
You need to get a schedule.
Anonymous wrote:I'm eager to see how KJ vs SR clown for a coach matchup in this high-stakes championship on Friday.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.
Let's get some new lines going:
1. SR vs. Visi (SR -6)
2. SSSAS vs. Potomac (SSSAS -5)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.
Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.
However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.
No, your absolute moron. The point being made was that there were no other offensive standouts except the two seniors and that Visitation would not be as strong offensively in the coming years. Get your IEP updated.
You sound unhinged.