Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still am in utter shock whenever I see a current pic of Jennifer Lopez.

No way that she can be fifty-three this month!!

No fifty-three year olds look like this in the real world - nope not even ONE.

Sure, since she is a celebrity everyone will just comment that she has $$ for cosmetic surgery, personal trainers, stylists, etc.

But so does Madonna and Mariah Carey.
And neither of them looked even a fraction of how good J Lo does.

J Lo defies aging.
Instead of looking worse as she gets older > she actually gets better looking as the years add on.
It’s not fair!!!!!
Lol.

There are a lot of 53 year olds that are as hot as her.

Where are they all hiding? Because where I live, fifty three (53) is considered over the hill. No one whistles at 53 year old women anymore.
But if Jennifer Lopez walked by a construction zone, men would be falling out of their bulldozers over her.

Meh . Not denying she looks good but if you watch the documentary you see it’s a bit of smoke and mirrors . She also chews gum constantly which really lowers her attractiveness

She probably chews gum to keep from overeating and stay thin. It’s better than smoking or doing coke.

Or she takes laxatives everyday as I do to stay thin.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still am in utter shock whenever I see a current pic of Jennifer Lopez.

No way that she can be fifty-three this month!!

No fifty-three year olds look like this in the real world - nope not even ONE.

Sure, since she is a celebrity everyone will just comment that she has $$ for cosmetic surgery, personal trainers, stylists, etc.

But so does Madonna and Mariah Carey.
And neither of them looked even a fraction of how good J Lo does.

J Lo defies aging.
Instead of looking worse as she gets older > she actually gets better looking as the years add on.
It’s not fair!!!!!
Lol.

There are a lot of 53 year olds that are as hot as her.

Where are they all hiding? Because where I live, fifty three (53) is considered over the hill. No one whistles at 53 year old women anymore.
But if Jennifer Lopez walked by a construction zone, men would be falling out of their bulldozers over her.

Meh . Not denying she looks good but if you watch the documentary you see it’s a bit of smoke and mirrors . She also chews gum constantly which really lowers her attractiveness

She probably chews gum to keep from overeating and stay thin. It’s better than smoking or doing coke.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently only Emme and Sera attended the wedding. The little boy is obviously too young to attend a midnight(!) wedding and Violet is not into it. No word on why JLo's son didn't attend. Obviously not a "kid first" event in any way. Two immature narcissists, good luck to them.

https://pagesix.com/2022/07/18/j-lo-rushed-to-get-married-before-ben-affleck-could-get-cold-feet-source/

A midnight wedding seems like an odd choice when you have children the ages of their children. I think I would want an event that included everyone.

Very selfish, but so what else is new.

Yes, but maybe also gave cover for the fact that at least one kid may not support the marriage.

!+ it would be very hard to have parents acting like teenagers when you, yourself, are one and want to be able to depend on your parents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still am in utter shock whenever I see a current pic of Jennifer Lopez.

No way that she can be fifty-three this month!!

No fifty-three year olds look like this in the real world - nope not even ONE.

Sure, since she is a celebrity everyone will just comment that she has $$ for cosmetic surgery, personal trainers, stylists, etc.

But so does Madonna and Mariah Carey.
And neither of them looked even a fraction of how good J Lo does.

J Lo defies aging.
Instead of looking worse as she gets older > she actually gets better looking as the years add on.
It’s not fair!!!!!
Lol.

There are a lot of 53 year olds that are as hot as her.

No way, boomer. Sorry. It's just not true.

Late 40s Gen Xer here and I know many women in their mid 50s who look as good as JLo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still am in utter shock whenever I see a current pic of Jennifer Lopez.

No way that she can be fifty-three this month!!

No fifty-three year olds look like this in the real world - nope not even ONE.

Sure, since she is a celebrity everyone will just comment that she has $$ for cosmetic surgery, personal trainers, stylists, etc.

But so does Madonna and Mariah Carey.
And neither of them looked even a fraction of how good J Lo does.

J Lo defies aging.
Instead of looking worse as she gets older > she actually gets better looking as the years add on.
It’s not fair!!!!!
Lol.

There are a lot of 53 year olds that are as hot as her.

Where are they all hiding? Because where I live, fifty three (53) is considered over the hill. No one whistles at 53 year old women anymore.
But if Jennifer Lopez walked by a construction zone, men would be falling out of their bulldozers over her.

Meh . Not denying she looks good but if you watch the documentary you see it’s a bit of smoke and mirrors . She also chews gum constantly which really lowers her attractiveness

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I think she looks amazing, but I was incredulous reading a Vogue puff piece about her hairdresser for the wedding. He was talking about classic barrel curls with no mention of obvious extensions. No doubt Ben wears a toupee, so no biggie. I think their marriage might last because of their respective ages. Ben must always fight becoming a dissipated, fat drunk gambler and it does seem like his survival instinct kicks in with his choice of wives. The two Jennifers aren’t that different in terms of clean living.

It's a hair transplant, not a toupee.

Anonymous wrote:
I think she looks amazing, but I was incredulous reading a Vogue puff piece about her hairdresser for the wedding. He was talking about classic barrel curls with no mention of obvious extensions. No doubt Ben wears a toupee, so no biggie. I think their marriage might last because of their respective ages. Ben must always fight becoming a dissipated, fat drunk gambler and it does seem like his survival instinct kicks in with his choice of wives. The two Jennifers aren’t that different in terms of clean living.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently only Emme and Sera attended the wedding. The little boy is obviously too young to attend a midnight(!) wedding and Violet is not into it. No word on why JLo's son didn't attend. Obviously not a "kid first" event in any way. Two immature narcissists, good luck to them.

https://pagesix.com/2022/07/18/j-lo-rushed-to-get-married-before-ben-affleck-could-get-cold-feet-source/

A midnight wedding seems like an odd choice when you have children the ages of their children. I think I would want an event that included everyone.

Very selfish, but so what else is new.

Yes, but maybe also gave cover for the fact that at least one kid may not support the marriage.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently only Emme and Sera attended the wedding. The little boy is obviously too young to attend a midnight(!) wedding and Violet is not into it. No word on why JLo's son didn't attend. Obviously not a "kid first" event in any way. Two immature narcissists, good luck to them.

https://pagesix.com/2022/07/18/j-lo-rushed-to-get-married-before-ben-affleck-could-get-cold-feet-source/

A midnight wedding seems like an odd choice when you have children the ages of their children. I think I would want an event that included everyone.

Very selfish, but so what else is new.

Yes, but maybe also gave cover for the fact that at least one kid may not support the marriage.

My guess is that only two of the kids agreed to attended. They likely would have preferred having the whole bunch- it would have made a better story and a good photo op.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I love Jenn Garner and would love to have lunch with her today. I am also a hopeless romantic and wish Ben and Jen only the best, but I would not change my name to JA. JLo is her brand and working name.

+1. It’s like she’s trying to one-up Jennifer Garner by taking his name. No hyphen even.

WTF??

Jennifer is her name. She married a man named Affleck. She’s not trying to one-up the white ex-wife. She’s doing the same thing married women do every day.

Why didn’t she change her name for the other three men she married?

😉👍

Are you the Pete Davidson stan? You love emojis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I still am in utter shock whenever I see a current pic of Jennifer Lopez.

No way that she can be fifty-three this month!!

No fifty-three year olds look like this in the real world - nope not even ONE.

Sure, since she is a celebrity everyone will just comment that she has $$ for cosmetic surgery, personal trainers, stylists, etc.

But so does Madonna and Mariah Carey.
And neither of them looked even a fraction of how good J Lo does.

J Lo defies aging.
Instead of looking worse as she gets older > she actually gets better looking as the years add on.
It’s not fair!!!!!
Lol.

There are a lot of 53 year olds that are as hot as her.

Where are they all hiding? Because where I live, fifty three (53) is considered over the hill. No one whistles at 53 year old women anymore.
But if Jennifer Lopez walked by a construction zone, men would be falling out of their bulldozers over her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Apparently only Emme and Sera attended the wedding. The little boy is obviously too young to attend a midnight(!) wedding and Violet is not into it. No word on why JLo's son didn't attend. Obviously not a "kid first" event in any way. Two immature narcissists, good luck to them.

https://pagesix.com/2022/07/18/j-lo-rushed-to-get-married-before-ben-affleck-could-get-cold-feet-source/

A midnight wedding seems like an odd choice when you have children the ages of their children. I think I would want an event that included everyone.

Very selfish, but so what else is new.

Yes, but maybe also gave cover for the fact that at least one kid may not support the marriage.