Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Full frontal though?

Yup! I’m surprised this hasn’t been discussed yet. I’m not such a fan of this reboot, but the downstairs neighbor dropping his towel was definitely a highlight.

I didn’t see any full frontal. I watched on the HBO Max app

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
It still bugs me that with all her millions now, Carrie is still in a walk up alcove studio apartment on the UES.


I hear you. Does she actually have millions though? Why can't she just get a classic-6 on the UES or something? I posted upthread about money and her closet. I really liked this episode-- thought it was well written. Loved the Grey Gardens reference with Carrie's smoking outfits.

The racks of clothing in her apartment highlighted this for me... I mean, is she really going to "archive" all of her clothes and shoes?




If Natasha was left $1m, Carrie was left millions (probably ~$5-10m) plus the money from selling the apartment. Which is good, since her income seems unsteady at best. She'd be foolish not to archive her designer wardrobe, which is her most significant asset other than the apartment. Worth at least $100k, and the real true love of her life!


Wayyyy more. Remember, she had $40K in just shoes back in the early oughts.


How much can $40k of shoes from 20 years ago be worth? Mostly worn? Not a ton.


Not the cheap crap you wear from Payless, she had designer shoes -- Manolo, Jimmy Choos and such. But the point is if she had $40K worth of SHOES in the early oughts her wardrobe wasn't inexpensive then and she didn't just suddenly start buying Old Navy tops. She has spent a lifetime buying fashionable shoes, handbags, clothes and all of that is likely to be worth way more than $100K.



Yes, and each item worn a mere handful of times (if that) and immaculately conserved.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just caught up. So sad for Steve. He really didn't deserve this.

No, he didn’t, but he won’t be alone for long. And it would be doing him a favor to free him to partner with someone who really loves him rather than always resorting to seeing him as “less than.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just caught up. So sad for Steve. He really didn't deserve this.

No, he didn’t, but he won’t be alone for long. And it would be doing him a favor to free him to partner with someone who really loves him rather than always resorting to seeing him as “less than.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t remember there being such heavy handed product placement in the original series. Oura rings and witch brownies, wth?

+1 Not to mention Apple products as well

Apple has always had product placement in the show.

Yup. Watch the first seasons and every episode has a shot of Carrie on her bed with her laptop taking up almost the entire frame and the apple logo glowing.

Anonymous wrote:Just caught up. So sad for Steve. He really didn't deserve this.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Full frontal though?

Yup! I’m surprised this hasn’t been discussed yet. I’m not such a fan of this reboot, but the downstairs neighbor dropping his towel was definitely a highlight.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t remember there being such heavy handed product placement in the original series. Oura rings and witch brownies, wth?

+1 Not to mention Apple products as well

Apple has always had product placement in the show.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t remember there being such heavy handed product placement in the original series. Oura rings and witch brownies, wth?

+1 Not to mention Apple products as well

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t remember there being such heavy handed product placement in the original series. Oura rings and witch brownies, wth?

+1 Not to mention Apple products as well

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It still bugs me that with all her millions now, Carrie is still in a walk up alcove studio apartment on the UES.

I hear you. Does she actually have millions though? Why can't she just get a classic-6 on the UES or something? I posted upthread about money and her closet. I really liked this episode-- thought it was well written. Loved the Grey Gardens reference with Carrie's smoking outfits.

The racks of clothing in her apartment highlighted this for me... I mean, is she really going to "archive" all of her clothes and shoes?

If Natasha was left $1m, Carrie was left millions (probably ~$5-10m) plus the money from selling the apartment. Which is good, since her income seems unsteady at best. She'd be foolish not to archive her designer wardrobe, which is her most significant asset other than the apartment. Worth at least $100k, and the real true love of her life!

Wayyyy more. Remember, she had $40K in just shoes back in the early oughts.

How much can $40k of shoes from 20 years ago be worth? Mostly worn? Not a ton.

Anonymous wrote:I don’t remember there being such heavy handed product placement in the original series. Oura rings and witch brownies, wth?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Full frontal though?

Yup! I’m surprised this hasn’t been discussed yet. I’m not such a fan of this reboot, but the downstairs neighbor dropping his towel was definitely a highlight.

Anonymous wrote:Full frontal though?