Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Iran state media reported that they did not strike Saudi Arabia oil refinery. They accuse Israel of carrying out yet another false flag attack.“

Ooh, I *definitely* believe what Iran has to say!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Confirmed by Marco Rubio. Israel ordered the strike. Not the US Congress, not the President but Bibi Netanyahu.

[twitter] https://x.com/acyn/status/2028573242173366282?s=46[/twitter]

The lie: “If we stood and waited for that attack to come first, before we hit them, we would suffer much higher casualties.”

How on earth is that a lie? He's absolutely correct.

It's just comical.

What would you say if Biden's Nat Sec Advisor said this after a strike against Iran? You have no view or thoughts of your own. You're a sad, pathetic sheep.

Ummmm... if only he had! If only Obama or Biden had ever had the nerve or fortitude to do what's been necessary for decades now. I would have been shocked and very pleasantly surprised if anyone in those administrations had ever done anything like this. Instead, all we heard about was Obama's nonexistent "red line."

But Trump said multiple times over the years Obama was a fool for even considering it?!? So was your Dear Leader wrong? Answer this basic question.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

For 35 years Israel has been saying Iran is a week away from a nuclear bomb. It’s all been a lie. Iran pose no threat to the US or US interests. If you are so willing to take care of this now send enlist and join the invasion!

The naivete (stupidity?) is gob smacking. Wow.

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Anonymous wrote:There have now been about 10 different official justifications for this war, and none of them make any sense or are rooted in any factual basis.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Iran state media reported that they did not strike Saudi Arabia oil refinery. They accuse Israel of carrying out yet another false flag attack. “

I believe the news came first from Tucker Carlson, where he said Mossad operatives were arrested in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

https://xcancel.com/MirMAKOfficial/status/2028582758147096961

Honestly, incredibly believable. And far more believable than anything Israel would have to say.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD has now figured out this is a disaster and is trying to distance himself:

He cannot distance himself from the "go big" advice that he purportedly offered and Trump appears to have accepted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

For 35 years Israel has been saying Iran is a week away from a nuclear bomb. It’s all been a lie. Iran pose no threat to the US or US interests. If you are so willing to take care of this now send enlist and join the invasion!

The naivete (stupidity?) is gob smacking. Wow.

Anonymous wrote:“Iran state media reported that they did not strike Saudi Arabia oil refinery. They accuse Israel of carrying out yet another false flag attack.“

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

For 35 years Israel has been saying Iran is a week away from a nuclear bomb. It’s all been a lie. Iran pose no threat to the US or US interests. If you are so willing to take care of this now send enlist and join the invasion!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Is this a real post or just a really good troll? I honestly cannot tell.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The pro war set in America and Israel are saying Iranian missiles are too dangerous for them to have, but they also say there’s nothing to fear because their missiles are weak and not effective.

Which one is it?

In June 2025 Israel was not able to shoot down one Iranian missile. It was all the US. This scared the sh#t out of Israel. Israel is a really smal country. I really do not understand what the republicans are trying to accomplish.

You may be able to slow down production of missiles and drones for a week or month but they will adapt. The Iranians will improve their ballistic missiles. They will add multiple warheads, increase speed, range, guidance systems, payload, etc. The Iranians are building drones and other things for the Russians and the Russians are desperate. The Russians will give the Iranians all the technical help they can. China will also help.

The US has no plan but the Israelis do. The Israel plan is against the national interest of the US. The Israelis want to make Iran a failed state.

Good. Everything you stated is exactly what they need to be cut off at the knees rather than allowed to continue developing weapons they intend to use against the U.S.
DP

Would much rather see Israel as a failed state and see the Middle East become a stable prosperous region.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The pro war set in America and Israel are saying Iranian missiles are too dangerous for them to have, but they also say there’s nothing to fear because their missiles are weak and not effective.

Which one is it?

In June 2025 Israel was not able to shoot down one Iranian missile. It was all the US. This scared the sh#t out of Israel. Israel is a really smal country. I really do not understand what the republicans are trying to accomplish.

You may be able to slow down production of missiles and drones for a week or month but they will adapt. The Iranians will improve their ballistic missiles. They will add multiple warheads, increase speed, range, guidance systems, payload, etc. The Iranians are building drones and other things for the Russians and the Russians are desperate. The Russians will give the Iranians all the technical help they can. China will also help.

The US has no plan but the Israelis do. The Israel plan is against the national interest of the US. The Israelis want to make Iran a failed state.

Good. Everything you stated is exactly what they need to be cut off at the knees rather than allowed to continue developing weapons they intend to use against the U.S.
DP

Anonymous wrote:“Iran state media reported that they did not strike Saudi Arabia oil refinery. They accuse Israel of carrying out yet another false flag attack.“

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.