Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The pro war set in America and Israel are saying Iranian missiles are too dangerous for them to have, but they also say there’s nothing to fear because their missiles are weak and not effective.

Which one is it?

In June 2025 Israel was not able to shoot down one Iranian missile. It was all the US. This scared the sh#t out of Israel. Israel is a really smal country. I really do not understand what the republicans are trying to accomplish.

You may be able to slow down production of missiles and drones for a week or month but they will adapt. The Iranians will improve their ballistic missiles. They will add multiple warheads, increase speed, range, guidance systems, payload, etc. The Iranians are building drones and other things for the Russians and the Russians are desperate. The Russians will give the Iranians all the technical help they can. China will also help.

The US has no plan but the Israelis do. The Israel plan is against the national interest of the US. The Israelis want to make Iran a failed state.

Good. Everything you stated is exactly what they need to be cut off at the knees rather than allowed to continue developing weapons they intend to use against the U.S.
DP

U.S. Troops Were Told Iran War Is for “Armageddon,” Return of Jesus
Advocacy group reports commanders giving similar messages at more than 30 installations in every branch of the military


https://jonathanlarsen.substack.com/p/us-troops-were-told-iran-war-is-for

Make Crusades Great Again!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD has now figured out this is a disaster and is trying to distance himself:

He cannot distance himself from the "go big" advice that he purportedly offered and Trump appears to have accepted.

Seems he’s leaving open the argument that they didn’t execute the right way. And he was also really against it.

Naw, MAGA won't buy that, because trump is never wrong, so JD gets to carry the anvil.

You sound incredibly ignorant. "Naw, MAGA". Do better.

Anonymous wrote:The pro war set in America and Israel are saying Iranian missiles are too dangerous for them to have, but they also say there’s nothing to fear because their missiles are weak and not effective.

Which one is it?

In June 2025 Israel was not able to shoot down one Iranian missile. It was all the US. This scared the sh#t out of Israel. Israel is a really smal country. I really do not understand what the republicans are trying to accomplish.

You may be able to slow down production of missiles and drones for a week or month but they will adapt. The Iranians will improve their ballistic missiles. They will add multiple warheads, increase speed, range, guidance systems, payload, etc. The Iranians are building drones and other things for the Russians and the Russians are desperate. The Russians will give the Iranians all the technical help they can. China will also help.

The US has no plan but the Israelis do. The Israel plan is against the national interest of the US. The Israelis want to make Iran a failed state.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

But they will within a decade, as the article states. Don't know about you, but I'd rather take care of this now than scramble to defend ourselves in a few years.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD has now figured out this is a disaster and is trying to distance himself:

He cannot distance himself from the "go big" advice that he purportedly offered and Trump appears to have accepted.

Seems he’s leaving open the argument that they didn’t execute the right way. And he was also really against it.

Naw, MAGA won't buy that, because trump is never wrong, so JD gets to carry the anvil.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD has now figured out this is a disaster and is trying to distance himself:

He cannot distance himself from the "go big" advice that he purportedly offered and Trump appears to have accepted.

Seems he’s leaving open the argument that they didn’t execute the right way. And he was also really against it.

Anonymous wrote:There have now been about 10 different official justifications for this war, and none of them make any sense or are rooted in any factual basis.

Rubio explained it pretty clearly today. Netanyahu told Trump he was going to attack. The US believed Iran would attack US assets if he did. Instead of manning up and telling Netanyahu no, Trump said yes sir and did as he was told.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

But I thought we obliterated Iran’s nuclear program last June?

Trump, Hegseth and this administration are in a big hole. Israel dragged them into this and through gross incompetence, or a severe miscalculation, they are now finding out that Iran isn’t just going to roll over.

Anonymous wrote:JD has now figured out this is a disaster and is trying to distance himself:

He cannot distance himself from the "go big" advice that he purportedly offered and Trump appears to have accepted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can the person who said they are throwing JD Vance under the bus post a link? I’d like something good to come out of this.

Now multiple sources...the white house is pushing it out there to the right wing media. Vance is toast.

Yes maga is all for this war.

Not really. The maga base is not at all for this war. And some Democrats *are* for this war. You really need to stop throwing out your childish "maga" nonsense since you clearly don't know what you're talking about.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-iran-strike-tests-maga-unity-ahead-midterms-2026-02-28/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Even Commander Diaper’s own intel said that there was no pending attack. They don’t even have the capability.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.

Is this a real post or just a really good troll? I honestly cannot tell.

“Iran state media reported that they did not strike Saudi Arabia oil refinery. They accuse Israel of carrying out yet another false flag attack.“

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"U.S. officials and lawmakers with access to classified information ... say the administration’s assertions are incomplete, unsubstantiated, or flat-out wrong."

- Wall Street Journal

https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/trumps-case-for-war-with-iran-faces-growing-scrutiny-96648cb9?mod=e2tw

Of course. And if even the WSJ is printing this, imagine what's REALLY happening.

Yes, far better to pass by this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, while the regime is weak, and wait another decade until they've managed to rebuild their nuclear program and attack the U.S. If he had not attacked when he had the chance, and Iran later *did* strike the U.S., you people would be shrieking about the wasted opportunity. Can't please everyone.