Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.

My source says SR got "all the 2030s"... Not great for the rest of us.

SR has a dozen 2030s who play club, most for strong teams and they have girls coming in every position from high scoring attackers to goalie

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.

My source says SR got "all the 2030s"... Not great for the rest of us.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.

Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.

The worst example is the 49ers, Craig, Rathman, Clarke and Ronnie Lott. Hell you can replace Montana for Young.

Anonymous wrote:Potomac is going to get cooked by SR tomorrow.

Anonymous wrote:SRs 2030s is legit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.

I agree with that. Losing those seniors is a significant issue that goes well beyond just scoring, but if we focus solely on points, I'd say that Visi already distributes scoring well enough that they'll have options next year. It's worth noting that all the Big 4 teams are losing key senior scorers. Supporters of other teams might believe their pipelines are strong enough to compete next year. However, they may not fully appreciate what the Big 4 have lined up, which is likely better than expected. Therefore, I would not expect any changes in the makeup of the Big 4 next year.

Anonymous wrote:I believe the Visi analysis is wrong. There is a 27, probably two 28s, and at least one 29 that can fill up the cage. Maybe they aren't featured with the presence of the talented seniors, but I would offer that there is more talent there for future years than the ambitious usurpers think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.

Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.

Someone is trying to make a point that a two star team can be elite despite the surrounding talent.

However, all those teams mentioned had all stars and hall of famers on their teams around the two stars. It’s not making the case they think it is.

Anonymous wrote:Can any of you explain clearly what point you are trying to make with these various sporting references? Are you just agreeing with the PP who suggested the seniors are the only offensive threats? I feel like I’m missing an inside joke here.