Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Have the Repubs gotten their stories straight about the raid yet?
No, the mother ship is under attack from multiple fronts, so they haven't been able to beam out instructions to the collective.
Anonymous wrote:Have the Repubs gotten their stories straight about the raid yet?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Simple PP, those with Trump Derange Syndrome and Never Trumpers have an issue with these whistleblowers
I am the PP you quote. I am a democrat and have not voted for any republican since the late 90s (and that was for a local office). I am not a "Never Trumper" but would probably qualify in your mind as having Trump Derangement Syndrome.
I am completely and utterly serious. If 1 FBI agent (leave alone 14) comes forward saying there was something illegal or unethical about the DoJ's actions, s/he should be afforded all the protections of the Whistleblower Act and no negative actions should be taken against the whistleblower(s).
I doubt Jordan is on the up and up, but if he is in this case, I would absolutely want to hear about it.
Suspect it's just more of the crap that happened with the J6 hearings when something was claimed to be "anonymous whistleblower" or "Secret Service denies it" that's trashtalking but when it comes time to step up and lay their hands on a bible, swear to tell the truth under penalty of perjury and repeat claims being made they suddenly become shy and are nowhere to be found.
Without sworn testimony broadcast on C-SPAN I don't believe it.
Certainly. Privately it's "You want to get there? Calling your bluff, Punk", and publicly it's "Whistleblowers should be afforded every protection under the law; we welcome their testimony."
Anonymous wrote:
I watched the entire 6 minute clip that contained Jim Jordan’s claim that 14 FBI agents have approached his office as whistleblowers. It’s not 14 since the MAL raid. He says it’s becoming a well worn path over things like parents being treated as terrorists for the way they behaved at school board meetings and all kinds of things. The vast majority of the complaining in that clip is about Jim Comey.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Simple PP, those with Trump Derange Syndrome and Never Trumpers have an issue with these whistleblowers
I am the PP you quote. I am a democrat and have not voted for any republican since the late 90s (and that was for a local office). I am not a "Never Trumper" but would probably qualify in your mind as having Trump Derangement Syndrome.
I am completely and utterly serious. If 1 FBI agent (leave alone 14) comes forward saying there was something illegal or unethical about the DoJ's actions, s/he should be afforded all the protections of the Whistleblower Act and no negative actions should be taken against the whistleblower(s).
I doubt Jordan is on the up and up, but if he is in this case, I would absolutely want to hear about it.
Suspect it's just more of the crap that happened with the J6 hearings when something was claimed to be "anonymous whistleblower" or "Secret Service denies it" that's trashtalking but when it comes time to step up and lay their hands on a bible, swear to tell the truth under penalty of perjury and repeat claims being made they suddenly become shy and are nowhere to be found.
Without sworn testimony broadcast on C-SPAN I don't believe it.
Anonymous wrote:
Let's protect the whistleblowers and listen to what they have to say.
Anonymous wrote:Still throwing ketchup-covered spaghetti at the wall to see what'll stick, are you Rs.
What's going to stick are the charges of treason.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Simple PP, those with Trump Derange Syndrome and Never Trumpers have an issue with these whistleblowers
I am the PP you quote. I am a democrat and have not voted for any republican since the late 90s (and that was for a local office). I am not a "Never Trumper" but would probably qualify in your mind as having Trump Derangement Syndrome.
I am completely and utterly serious. If 1 FBI agent (leave alone 14) comes forward saying there was something illegal or unethical about the DoJ's actions, s/he should be afforded all the protections of the Whistleblower Act and no negative actions should be taken against the whistleblower(s).
I doubt Jordan is on the up and up, but if he is in this case, I would absolutely want to hear about it.