Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.
Good note!
--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms
--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)
3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes
Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.
+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.
+2 HC and NCS will be playing each other in the championship a week from Saturday.
Sorry, a year from Saturday I meant to say. NCS and HC are the teams to watch out for after the “big 4” graduate all their talent.
A year from Saturday Bullis or Holton will be relegated.
Holton it is!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.
Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.
Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.
That is the possibly top 5 dumbest comments on this thread. "No real offensive threats except..." the recognized best player in the country and probably the second best player in the ISL.
The comment is that the two seniors are their only offensive threats without spelling out that they are the No. 2 ranked player in the country and the other senior is not even close to being the second best player in the ISL. You must be high.
I am but that doesn't change the fact you said "no real offensive threats."
Dumb, di-dumb, dumb, Dumbbbbb!
Do you understand the meaning of the word “except” which you conveniently leave out? What a moron.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.
Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.
Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.
That is the possibly top 5 dumbest comments on this thread. "No real offensive threats except..." the recognized best player in the country and probably the second best player in the ISL.
The comment is that the two seniors are their only offensive threats without spelling out that they are the No. 2 ranked player in the country and the other senior is not even close to being the second best player in the ISL. You must be high.
I am but that doesn't change the fact you said "no real offensive threats."
Dumb, di-dumb, dumb, Dumbbbbb!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.
Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.
Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.
That is the possibly top 5 dumbest comments on this thread. "No real offensive threats except..." the recognized best player in the country and probably the second best player in the ISL.
The comment is that the two seniors are their only offensive threats without spelling out that they are the No. 2 ranked player in the country and the other senior is not even close to being the second best player in the ISL. You must be high.
I am but that doesn't change the fact you said "no real offensive threats."
Dumb, di-dumb, dumb, Dumbbbbb!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.
Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.
Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.
That is the possibly top 5 dumbest comments on this thread. "No real offensive threats except..." the recognized best player in the country and probably the second best player in the ISL.
The comment is that the two seniors are their only offensive threats without spelling out that they are the No. 2 ranked player in the country and the other senior is not even close to being the second best player in the ISL. You must be high.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.
Good note!
--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms
--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)
3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes
Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.
+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.
+2 HC and NCS will be playing each other in the championship a week from Saturday.
Sorry, a year from Saturday I meant to say. NCS and HC are the teams to watch out for after the “big 4” graduate all their talent.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.
Good note!
--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms
--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)
3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes
Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.
+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.
+2 HC and NCS will be playing each other in the championship a week from Saturday.
Sorry, a year from Saturday I meant to say. NCS and HC are the teams to watch out for after the “big 4” graduate all their talent.
A year from Saturday Bullis or Holton will be relegated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.
Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.
Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.
That is the possibly top 5 dumbest comments on this thread. "No real offensive threats except..." the recognized best player in the country and probably the second best player in the ISL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.
Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.
Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.
That is the possibly top 5 dumbest comments on this thread. "No real offensive threats except..." the recognized best player in the country and probably the second best player in the ISL.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.
Good note!
--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms
--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)
3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes
Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.
+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.
+2 HC and NCS will be playing each other in the championship a week from Saturday.
Sorry, a year from Saturday I meant to say. NCS and HC are the teams to watch out for after the “big 4” graduate all their talent.
Anonymous wrote:I heard the NCS coach is going to put in place her cracker jack organizational structure she leans on to communicate and work with Capital families during recruiting at the AA ISL level. We'll all get to witness transparency, efficiency, no complaining and absolutely never forgetting kids names at the highest level!