Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

I'm super glad to hear that and that someone somewhere isn't feeling bad about that mistake.

I mean, I am happy about that, but I'm more than a little troubled by all the LYING from police.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

I'm super glad to hear that and that someone somewhere isn't feeling bad about that mistake.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Now the shooter apologists will blame the rock.

Anonymous wrote:Remember how it was repeatedly emphasized that a teacher propped a door open and then that she left the building and left it open again upon her return?

Well, surprise, surprise, that narrative appears to be falling apart:

Anonymous wrote:Thread from the daughter of a teacher killed at Sandy Hook, for those of you who think autopsy photos are a solution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

What are your sentences one-word fragments?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?

Daddies shouldn't have AR-15s, either.

But by your logic, we should get rid of the age limits for purchasing alcohol, because kids will just break into their parent's stash anyway 🙄

Other. Developed. Countries. Don't. Have. This. Problem. Because they focused on the issue - firearms - not turning schools into war zones.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wouldn’t help anyway. All evidence suggests resource officers don’t want to engage active shooters. So we don’t need them - waste of money.

Then use police officers.

Police weren't much help in this case, were they?

One of my good friends is a police officer. He says it's divided: half of the officers say they would wait around as they did in Texas to form a plan and wait for additional backup. The other half say no, you swore an oath, you go in there even if you are going to die because at least it gives the people you are sworn to protect a chance.

I'm not willing to take that 50/50 gamble with my children's lives. Are you?

This is illogical.

You actually are saying, like in an active shooter situation, YOU DONT WANT POLICE???? YOU WOULDNT CALL FREAKING 9-1-1????? Who would you call - Ghostbusters? Social worker?

Please, walk me through who will respond to an active shooter situation in your world. Who would be the person to handle it? Or would you suggest everybody just pray and do nothing while a shooter mows down kids

What’s illogical about it?

People are saying instead of gun reform, we just need armed security and police officers in schools.

But we now know that many of those police and guards won’t do anything in the event of a shooter. Many will bail or just wait around, as was the case in Texas.

I’m not sure where you got the idea I wouldn’t call 9-1-1. I said I don’t think police officers in schools are a solution, because most are proving to be useless.

The answer is gun reform. Our children will be safer when people don’t have access to these guns, not when we put armed police in schools.

Imagine kids cant buy any guns anymore. Teen boy grabs daddy's AR-15 or glock and walks up to a school to commit a school shooting. Do you want police there?