Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has the Epstein connection already been covered here? Savannah has interviewed victims and covered the case over many years. I wonder if she's being punished for that
Epstein is dead.
He lives in Israel
Anonymous wrote:I bet it's either the shady band mate of the BIL looking for drugs, or she's in a vacation cabin somewhere where the Guthrie children deposited her so they could get some publicity out of this. Go Fund Me?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So clearly planned. Though he had to use the flowers to hide the camera?
Had gun; face mask and gloves. And backpack. Definitely planned out.
Alone?
Why? Not for money, right? To scare SG? Why? If not for ransom, what is it all for?
That seems like the scariest part.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal
Hit the floodlight that her kids forced her to get, even though they know damn well she LOVES the total darkness, with a broom handle because it shines in her bedroom window and she couldn't figure out how to turn the damn thing off, cut herself in the process and because without the floodlight it was pitch black out, the way she likes it, she got disoriented and walked into the dessert where she was bitten by a snake and dragged away by a coyote, who later dumped her in the dry well because they couldn't eat her in one sitting. But what I don't understand is what happened to the broom.
The fbi literally released a video of a masked intruder at her front door. But go on with the most plausible theory being her sleepwalking outdoors and dragged away without a trace by a coyote
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In my opinion, if this was a family job, they would’ve done it a different night of the week not Saturday night where she was known to gather with friends the next day for church. It would give them more time to dispose of the bodies create alibi.
There could have been argument and it was unplanned.
An argument? What did the mother try to play a joker in a pair during Mahjong?
You, my friend, have clearly never been the caretaker for an 80 something year old woman. Arguments are frequent (depending on the person) because they lose their filter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They said they want to celebrate her when she is returned. That does not sound like she is still alive.
You wouldn’t celebrate if your kidnapped mom was returned alive?
The word celebrate doesn’t imply death
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal
Hit the floodlight that her kids forced her to get, even though they know damn well she LOVES the total darkness, with a broom handle because it shines in her bedroom window and she couldn't figure out how to turn the damn thing off, cut herself in the process and because without the floodlight it was pitch black out, the way she likes it, she got disoriented and walked into the dessert where she was bitten by a snake and dragged away by a coyote, who later dumped her in the dry well because they couldn't eat her in one sitting. But what I don't understand is what happened to the broom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who wears a gun over their groin?
+1 same question
Seems very odd
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is Occam's razor for this situation?
For those not familiar:
Occam’s razor in crime, or the principle of parsimony, dictates that the simplest explanation requiring the fewest assumptions is usually the most likely to be correct. When investigating, it favors common sense and directly verifiable evidence over complex conspiracies or convoluted theorieS.
Sleepwalked, attacked and dragged off by an animal
Anonymous wrote:Is there a trail of the blood splatter down the driveway or is it just at the door. Can’t imagine him dragging a woman who can’t walk fast down the road or into a car, no screaming was heard?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Now that Camron and Savannah have done solo Video pleas…. Will Annie?
Do you remember the Elizabeth smart case? Everybody thought it was the father or another family member. The mother barely spoke out and did not want to appear on camera. they said that was odd. Guess what: it was no one in the family. You can’t judge what family members are doing during traumatic times based on what your “normal” mind I thinks they should do.
Really? I don't remember this. All I remember is that her little sister told the police she saw the person who took her and recognized him but couldn't remember from where. And that the parents refused to let the police keep questioning her over and over, saying that it would cause her to clam up or modify her memory of what she really saw, to fit whatever the police might be leading her towards. Which I guess might be seen as suspicious, yes, but apparently they were totally right because the girl one day was like BOOM I KNOW WHO IT WAS and she was 100% correct. That girl rocks.
There’s a new Netflix documentary on the case and that is accurate. The father and then the uncle was suspected and the uncle’s demeanor (after all the stress and exhaustion of the search) was somewhat odd. I had forgotten several details of the case. It’s a good documentary if you are looking for something to watch.
Thanks, I’ll check it out! I remember that case really vividly and I remember reading some of Elizabeth’s testimony at the trial. And I was just blown away by how composed and strong she was. I remember thinking, her parents must have done something right after she was found, in terms of support and love and counseling, to help her turn out as good as she did
It’s a coping mechanism. And her documentary she talks about still working through it. Many of us who went through childhood trauma were described as being poised, mature beyond their years, etc. but it’s kind of like a duck gliding smoothly across the water. You don’t see underneath their feet Are kicking like crazy just trying to stay afloat.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.
Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.
She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.
Haunted? What a drama queen.
Well, one IS reminded of Rasputin. Just sayin’.
Just say less. You've said enough.
Huh? We need MORE posters like that. I bet you don't even know who Rasputin is PP.
Rasputin poster -- you are appreciated!
Yes round up all the bearded men. Why do we need more of that?
Anonymous wrote:I see woman’s eyes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm haunted by Tomasso's appearance.
Sounds like Nancy was a great mother.
She thought she was having a wholesome dinner and family game night.
Haunted? What a drama queen.
Well, one IS reminded of Rasputin. Just sayin’.
Just say less. You've said enough.
Huh? We need MORE posters like that. I bet you don't even know who Rasputin is PP.
Rasputin poster -- you are appreciated!