Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms

--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)

3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes

Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.

+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.

+2 HC and NCS will be playing each other in the championship a week from Saturday.

Sorry, a year from Saturday I meant to say. NCS and HC are the teams to watch out for after the “big 4” graduate all their talent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms

--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)

3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes

Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.

+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.

+2 HC and NCS will be playing each other in the championship a week from Saturday.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms

--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)

3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes

Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.

+1. Good opportunity for some other schools to step up like NCS etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

I commend her. She is a hell of coach and has her priorities straight- FAMILY always comes first. That's the beauty of St. John's as they know what's important in life and could care less about an anonymous forum judging their head coach. SJC follows it's Lasallian principles= The "Lasallian Family" Concept: The tradition defines the school community itself as a family, where relationships are collaborative rather than strictly hierarchical, promoting a sense of belonging and mutual care among staff and students.

Sounds like the AD is not happy. All the coaches want a bring your kid to work day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Holy Child will lose, but think by less than 8.

Agreed. Don’t think HC is that bad and don’t Visi is that good.

Visi is vulnerable. Strength is the defense. No real offensive threats except for the 2 senior commits. However, HC has struggled on draw so that could be the difference. HC will beat Vis next year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

I commend her. She is a hell of coach and has her priorities straight- FAMILY always comes first. That's the beauty of St. John's as they know what's important in life and could care less about an anonymous forum judging their head coach. SJC follows it's Lasallian principles= The "Lasallian Family" Concept: The tradition defines the school community itself as a family, where relationships are collaborative rather than strictly hierarchical, promoting a sense of belonging and mutual care among staff and students.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BI over SJC 10-9 Final.

Say what?

Is the St. John's HC really coaching with a baby strapped to her chest? Is she a single mom?

Imagine the mentality of observing a mother who is clearly committed to both her child and dozens of young women, having a negative reaction, and then degrading her on an anonomous lacrosse forum.

I legitimately feel bad for this person. They must be incredibly unhappy and empty inside. Hopefully it doesn't affect their spouse and children too much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms

--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)

3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes

Visi HC game was much tighter in the first half than the final score would indicate. Hats off to Visi just saying losing their star seniors will bring them back to earth next year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:score of Ireton game

You are going to need to wait about 20 hours

Anonymous wrote:score of Ireton game

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, she is arguably the best in the ISL.

You mean the goalie who got beat out by the freaking NCS goalie for American Select? You mean the goalie who didn’t make All-American? You mean the goalie that you guys needed to make a fake origin story to take her seriously? This chat needs to figure out what they’re talking about.

This is amazing. Now we have NCS goalie dad entering picture who is equally as nuts. I’m getting my popcorn as these two dads duke it out

Legitimately heard people have avoided that school because of the dad

He’s too bald for my liking, I’m afraid it’s going to blind my children along with myself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms

--SR -18 vs Episcopal (actual -17)
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis (actual -14)
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child (actual -10)
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms (actual -7)

3 observations: (1) lines were solid; (2) HC guy was wrong; and (3) gap between top 4 and HC and H-A didn’t close much at all this year despite their boosters hopes

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those should be minus signs but they look fairly accurate.

Good note!

--SR -18 vs Episcopal
--SSSAS -14 vs Bullis
--Visi -8 vs Holy Child
--Potomac -5 vs Holton-Arms