Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But those are the very reasons that - no matter how could a job "Este's crew" does - SYC will never be considered an elite club.
They aren't going to be able to attract and retain the best players.
It sounds like you classify an elite club as only those that are topped off by a DA (i.e. Arlington, Loudoun, Bethesda). If that's the case, then you're right--SYC will probably not ever get there, as the best players will leave for DAs. However, they can get to the level of the best non-DA clubs in the region like McLean, Alexandria, LMVSC.
As far as the "raiding" question...There's no such thing as "raiding" for players. We don't sign multi-year contracts with clubs, and if we (as parents advocating for our players) don't like something, the club tells us to go f*ck ourselves. No parent or player owes a club a single thing beyond the fees which we agree to pay. Pay-to-play...it's a crappy system, but let's not pretend it should only work for the clubs.
Yeah, I think there will be lots of players and several coaches who go over to SYC. The worst part of that is that it seems that the coach of the teams at SYC that are already doing very well (06 and 07 Boys, both in their top brackets at the Jeff Cup) has already been fired. That seems pretty dumb.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
But those are the very reasons that - no matter how could a job "Este's crew" does - SYC will never be considered an elite club.
They aren't going to be able to attract and retain the best players.
It sounds like you classify an elite club as only those that are topped off by a DA (i.e. Arlington, Loudoun, Bethesda). If that's the case, then you're right--SYC will probably not ever get there, as the best players will leave for DAs. However, they can get to the level of the best non-DA clubs in the region like McLean, Alexandria, LMVSC.
As far as the "raiding" question...There's no such thing as "raiding" for players. We don't sign multi-year contracts with clubs, and if we (as parents advocating for our players) don't like something, the club tells us to go f*ck ourselves. No parent or player owes a club a single thing beyond the fees which we agree to pay. Pay-to-play...it's a crappy system, but let's not pretend it should only work for the clubs.
Yeah, I think there will be lots of players and several coaches who go over to SYC. The worst part of that is that it seems that the coach of the teams at SYC that are already doing very well (06 and 07 Boys, both in their top brackets at the Jeff Cup) has already been fired. That seems pretty dumb.
Anonymous wrote:
But those are the very reasons that - no matter how could a job "Este's crew" does - SYC will never be considered an elite club.
They aren't going to be able to attract and retain the best players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
What are you even talking about? SYC isn't transitioning to "elite" club soccer. They're a mess. They just fired a bunch of coaches in the middle of the year. Who would want to go to a club that does things like that? For parents of elite players especially, they put a lot of time and thought into finding the situation they think is optimal for their kid's development. At SYC, even if they thought they found such a situation (like the coach, like the training, like the club's philosophy), they now know that it could all change in the middle of the year without any warning or explanation, just b/c Dotty wants to make a change. Elite players will run away from a club run like that, not toward it.
Same with coaches too. When they land a coaching job, they count on it being set for the year. For the ones who just got canned, it will be almost impossible to find new coaching jobs at this time of year. That's a lot of lost income to try and replace. Who would want to take a job with an organization like that?
Besides, even if the new TD turns out great, SYC is too close to DA and ECNL clubs to ever make it to elite status. Heck, the couldn't even get into CCL I. At best they will be a feeder club.
Transition: change or passage from one state or stage to another.
I don't know how long it will take or whether, in the long run, it will be successful, but that's what they're going for. Yep, this has been a rough start. Yep, SYC is not elite (except for 2 teams, whose coaches have now apparently been fired). But five years from now, when no one remembers the messy TD transition and Este's crew has had a chance to build?
The argument about being too close to DA/ECNL clubs and the leagues they couldn't get into last year isn't even worth replying to.
Anonymous wrote:
What are you even talking about? SYC isn't transitioning to "elite" club soccer. They're a mess. They just fired a bunch of coaches in the middle of the year. Who would want to go to a club that does things like that? For parents of elite players especially, they put a lot of time and thought into finding the situation they think is optimal for their kid's development. At SYC, even if they thought they found such a situation (like the coach, like the training, like the club's philosophy), they now know that it could all change in the middle of the year without any warning or explanation, just b/c Dotty wants to make a change. Elite players will run away from a club run like that, not toward it.
Same with coaches too. When they land a coaching job, they count on it being set for the year. For the ones who just got canned, it will be almost impossible to find new coaching jobs at this time of year. That's a lot of lost income to try and replace. Who would want to take a job with an organization like that?
Besides, even if the new TD turns out great, SYC is too close to DA and ECNL clubs to ever make it to elite status. Heck, the couldn't even get into CCL I. At best they will be a feeder club.
Transition: change or passage from one state or stage to another.
I don't know how long it will take or whether, in the long run, it will be successful, but that's what they're going for. Yep, this has been a rough start. Yep, SYC is not elite (except for 2 teams, whose coaches have now apparently been fired). But five years from now, when no one remembers the messy TD transition and Este's crew has had a chance to build?
The argument about being too close to DA/ECNL clubs and the leagues they couldn't get into last year isn't even worth replying to.
Anonymous wrote:
What are you even talking about? SYC isn't transitioning to "elite" club soccer. They're a mess. They just fired a bunch of coaches in the middle of the year. Who would want to go to a club that does things like that? For parents of elite players especially, they put a lot of time and thought into finding the situation they think is optimal for their kid's development. At SYC, even if they thought they found such a situation (like the coach, like the training, like the club's philosophy), they now know that it could all change in the middle of the year without any warning or explanation, just b/c Dotty wants to make a change. Elite players will run away from a club run like that, not toward it.
Same with coaches too. When they land a coaching job, they count on it being set for the year. For the ones who just got canned, it will be almost impossible to find new coaching jobs at this time of year. That's a lot of lost income to try and replace. Who would want to take a job with an organization like that?
Besides, even if the new TD turns out great, SYC is too close to DA and ECNL clubs to ever make it to elite status. Heck, the couldn't even get into CCL I. At best they will be a feeder club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes he did. From conversations with other parents, it seems that prior to last year, travel was very fluid among the different teams within a given age group. Players on the C team that were doing well would be pulled into B team games. All that was stopped effective this fall. In addition, I attended an SYC Town Hall last December where they stated the way travel 'billing' (for lack of a better word) would be handled. Previously the team managers handled it but going forward it would be handled centrally (which makes sense from an efficiency standpoint). Apparently the result was that the fees were doubled (and they said this was to account for the numerous travel scholarships that are awarded). So yes, there has been some pretty big changes in the last two years.
It also seems that the former TD and other coaches who were let go were notified via email (no face-to-face meeting) and were not given an opportunity to present their case, with what essentially amounted to two days notice. Of course if they were in at-will contracts then that's the way it goes, but that handling of the situation doesn't reflect well on SYC. I have gathered that there are a lot of politics involved at the top of the soccer committee and this is probably reflective of that.
I would suspect that the competition both from spots on a particular squad and for playing minutes is about to get a much harder edge and that there will be plenty of hurt feelings to go around as SYC transitions into "elite" club soccer.
The good news is that the kids don't seem to usually take it as hard as the parents if they're asked to play on a less competitive team.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes he did. From conversations with other parents, it seems that prior to last year, travel was very fluid among the different teams within a given age group. Players on the C team that were doing well would be pulled into B team games. All that was stopped effective this fall. In addition, I attended an SYC Town Hall last December where they stated the way travel 'billing' (for lack of a better word) would be handled. Previously the team managers handled it but going forward it would be handled centrally (which makes sense from an efficiency standpoint). Apparently the result was that the fees were doubled (and they said this was to account for the numerous travel scholarships that are awarded). So yes, there has been some pretty big changes in the last two years.
It also seems that the former TD and other coaches who were let go were notified via email (no face-to-face meeting) and were not given an opportunity to present their case, with what essentially amounted to two days notice. Of course if they were in at-will contracts then that's the way it goes, but that handling of the situation doesn't reflect well on SYC. I have gathered that there are a lot of politics involved at the top of the soccer committee and this is probably reflective of that.
It's been about a week since the announcement and likely a few practices, how's it going?
Anonymous wrote:Yes he did. From conversations with other parents, it seems that prior to last year, travel was very fluid among the different teams within a given age group. Players on the C team that were doing well would be pulled into B team games. All that was stopped effective this fall. In addition, I attended an SYC Town Hall last December where they stated the way travel 'billing' (for lack of a better word) would be handled. Previously the team managers handled it but going forward it would be handled centrally (which makes sense from an efficiency standpoint). Apparently the result was that the fees were doubled (and they said this was to account for the numerous travel scholarships that are awarded). So yes, there has been some pretty big changes in the last two years.
It also seems that the former TD and other coaches who were let go were notified via email (no face-to-face meeting) and were not given an opportunity to present their case, with what essentially amounted to two days notice. Of course if they were in at-will contracts then that's the way it goes, but that handling of the situation doesn't reflect well on SYC. I have gathered that there are a lot of politics involved at the top of the soccer committee and this is probably reflective of that.