Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's now legal to lie to the FBI.
Congratulations, GOP.
You mean...thanks to Andrew McCabe.
Anonymous wrote:It's now legal to lie to the FBI.
Congratulations, GOP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's now legal to lie to the FBI.
Congratulations, GOP.
But, the reports from the FBI initially said he did not lie. It was Mueller team that said he lied.......
Anonymous wrote:It's now legal to lie to the FBI.
Congratulations, GOP.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am aware. There's a reason no one but Powellites are excited by this stuff. It's not Brady material.
Notes say that Comey said the call seemed to be "legit." That's not exculpatory?
Well, what did Flynn say about the calls when they asked him? Did he confirm that they were legit?
We don't know since the original 302 has never been produced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am aware. There's a reason no one but Powellites are excited by this stuff. It's not Brady material.
Notes say that Comey said the call seemed to be "legit." That's not exculpatory?
Well, what did Flynn say about the calls when they asked him? Did he confirm that they were legit?
We don't know since the original 302 has never been produced.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am aware. There's a reason no one but Powellites are excited by this stuff. It's not Brady material.
Notes say that Comey said the call seemed to be "legit." That's not exculpatory?
Well, what did Flynn say about the calls when they asked him? Did he confirm that they were legit?
Anonymous wrote:I am aware. There's a reason no one but Powellites are excited by this stuff. It's not Brady material.
Notes say that Comey said the call seemed to be "legit." That's not exculpatory?
I am aware. There's a reason no one but Powellites are excited by this stuff. It's not Brady material.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?
What did Biden know and when did he know it?
Nothing wrong with Biden bringing it up. What is wrong is that Biden has said he knew nothing about the criminal investigation into Flynn.
And, the fact that Biden was advocating for the Logan Act shows, that once again, he is on the wrong side of the issue.
The Logan Act, enacted in 1799, has NEVER been successfully prosecuted. If anyone should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, it should be John Kerry.
Remind me when Flynn was charged with violating the Logan Act?
Sounds like Biden didn't know anything about the criminal investigation.
Pay attention.
Strzok's handwritten notes.
Not surprised you aren't aware. They were only released YESTERDAY! After years of this crap going on.
Brady material withheld. Hopefully, those who decided not to give this material to the defense will be prosecuted.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?
What did Biden know and when did he know it?
Nothing wrong with Biden bringing it up. What is wrong is that Biden has said he knew nothing about the criminal investigation into Flynn.
And, the fact that Biden was advocating for the Logan Act shows, that once again, he is on the wrong side of the issue.
The Logan Act, enacted in 1799, has NEVER been successfully prosecuted. If anyone should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, it should be John Kerry.
Remind me when Flynn was charged with violating the Logan Act?
Sounds like Biden didn't know anything about the criminal investigation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?
What did Biden know and when did he know it?
I‘M really ok with the executive branch putting a stop to treasonous behavior. Why aren’t you?
Nothing Flynn did was treasonous. Flynn knew the process and in time would figure out the scheme being run by the Obama Administration of spying on fellow Americans without cause. That, my friend is treasonous.
Umm...
These Flynn delusions are laughable.
No derogatory information....doesn't get any plainer than that, my friend.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?
What did Biden know and when did he know it?
Nothing wrong with Biden bringing it up. What is wrong is that Biden has said he knew nothing about the criminal investigation into Flynn.
And, the fact that Biden was advocating for the Logan Act shows, that once again, he is on the wrong side of the issue.
The Logan Act, enacted in 1799, has NEVER been successfully prosecuted. If anyone should be prosecuted under the Logan Act, it should be John Kerry.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are there crickets on Biden pushing for the Logan Act against Flynn, per Strozk?
What did Biden know and when did he know it?
I‘M really ok with the executive branch putting a stop to treasonous behavior. Why aren’t you?
Nothing Flynn did was treasonous. Flynn knew the process and in time would figure out the scheme being run by the Obama Administration of spying on fellow Americans without cause. That, my friend is treasonous.
Umm...
These Flynn delusions are laughable.