Anonymous
08/02/2025 10:56
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:The declassified Durham report annex shows the special counsel set out to prove the ‘Clinton Plan’ emails were real but decided they were fakes made by Russian spies.
It's amazing to see people talking about those "emails" as if they were real.
Yup. And Tulsi Gabbard, Karoline Leavitt and MAGAs on social media are trying to construct a bogus narrative that it's some kind of "smoking gun evidence" that the entire "Russiagate" affair was completely fabricated by Hillary Clinton. It wasn't. Durham saw that. If it were fabricated by Clinton, Durham would have gone after her.
Nobody credible is buying into this new "Russiagate" crap coming from Trump. It's just another bogus distraction from the Epstein files.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 09:15
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous
08/01/2025 13:41
Subject: Barr and Durham
How many thousands of threads/posts did Jeff delete since 2016 when this farce was launched? Now the "chickens have come home to roost".
Anonymous
08/01/2025 13:38
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/us/politics/trump-clinton-emails-russia-investigation.html?unlocked_article_code=1.a08.WmHr.TWoZEuTvFEKm&smid=url-share
Clinton Plan’ Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, Declassified Report Shows
An annex to the Durham special counsel report was the latest in a series of disclosures about the Russia inquiry, as the Trump team seeks to distract from the Epstein files
So basically the GOP took Russian disinformation and forgeries and ran with it to smear the left. Big surprise.
Read every word of this article and let it sink in that the President, DNI, DCIA, FBI Director, numerous Republican Senators, and most MAGA influencers are knowingly spreading Russian disinformation in order to harm the IC and distract from the President's close relationship with a child rapist.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 13:14
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The Durham annex says the opposite, actually. I know because I did read it.
Let’s look at the facts.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”
“So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. Who on earth told you it was a good idea to now claim that never happened, or that any claims about it are Russian fabrications?
That’s beyond stupid, even for you.
You are an unrepentant liar. You merely plagiarized all of this. You are merely a moronic mouthpiece who is too stupid toknow he/she is going to get caught.
They could not authenticate it as real or fake. If no one actually had these original emails that the FBI could scrape, then they are not real. Suggesting otherwise is a fools errand that undermines our law enforcement. Russia interfered with the 2016 election on many fronts. The senate confirmed it, the Mueller Report confirmed it and people around Paul Manafort and George Papadopolous plead guilty to crimes because of it. Let's not rewrite history to favor the authoritarian who is aligned with Russia, please.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 13:11
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:The Durham annex says the opposite, actually. I know because I did read it.
Let’s look at the facts.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”
“So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. Who on earth told you it was a good idea to now claim that never happened, or that any claims about it are Russian fabrications?
That’s beyond stupid, even for you.
Marco Rubio disagrees with you
https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/publications/report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures
Anonymous
08/01/2025 13:10
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just glad that now Trump admin can wiretap political opponents like Obama did.
Its been established as legal and Trump is good at using Democrat strategy
Obama didn't wiretap the Trump campaign.
The US intelligence operatives along with our allies monitor our enemies including Russians, Chinese and so on.
A bunch of Trump operatives, including Paul Manafort, were caught in correspondances with our enemies.
And THAT is what Trump is upset about.
Maybe ask why so many people in Trump's 2016 orbit were communicating with our enemies?
Don't know what cloud you live in.
the email being cited in the body of the tweet is a russian fake....get it? Basing anything REAL off it is is buying into what Russia did in 2016 against the American public. John Soloman and Glenn Greenwald are REPEATING Russia disinformation as if it were real, and you bringing it here are amplifying it.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 13:08
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:The declassified Durham report annex shows the special counsel set out to prove the ‘Clinton Plan’ emails were real but decided they were fakes made by Russian spies.
It's amazing to see people talking about those "emails" as if they were real.
this and it cannot be repeated enough
Anonymous
08/01/2025 12:58
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:The Durham annex says the opposite, actually. I know because I did read it.
Let’s look at the facts.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”
“So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. Who on earth told you it was a good idea to now claim that never happened, or that any claims about it are Russian fabrications?
That’s beyond stupid, even for you.
You are an unrepentant liar. You merely plagiarized all of this. You are merely a moronic mouthpiece who is too stupid toknow he/she is going to get caught.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 12:05
Subject: Barr and Durham
Clinton Campaign and the DNC shared the payment for the Steele Dossier 50%/50% - John Podesta in sworn testimony.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-for-research-that-led-to-russia-dossier/2017/10/24/226fabf0-b8e4-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html
Anonymous
08/01/2025 12:00
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:The Durham annex says the opposite, actually. I know because I did read it.
Let’s look at the facts.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”
“So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. Who on earth told you it was a good idea to now claim that never happened, or that any claims about it are Russian fabrications?
That’s beyond stupid, even for you.
Clinton literally continued a "scheme" started by Republicans, did not start it.
If only Trump has not colluded with Russia, we never would be here today.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 11:57
Subject: Barr and Durham
The Durham annex says the opposite, actually. I know because I did read it.
Let’s look at the facts.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”
“So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. Who on earth told you it was a good idea to now claim that never happened, or that any claims about it are Russian fabrications?
That’s beyond stupid, even for you.
Let’s look at the facts.
1) The Durham annex never states at all that the specific intelligence was “fabricated.” It says the opposite, that his office was never able to “determine definitively whether the purported Clinton campaign plan [intelligence]…was entirely genuine, partially true, a composite pulled from multiple sources, exaggerated in certain respects, or fabricated in its entirety.”
2) At the time the intel which Ben Smith says was “fake” was received, John Brennan took it so seriously that he briefed Obama about it, took notes about it, and stashed the notes away in his safe.
3) James Comey specifically went under oath and cited the Clinton plan intelligence as one of the major reasons he chose to unilaterally usurp the authority of Loretta Lynch and to declare that the U.S. government would not charge Hillary Clinton for her use of an illegal private email server.
4) Comey told Congress that he believed the Clinton plan intelligence was “genuine.”
“So far as I knew at the time, and still think,” Comey testified on December 7, 2018, “the material itself was genuine[.]”
5) FBI general counsel James Baker said he was “greatly concerned” about the intel and specifically Lynch’s reaction when confronted with it. Durham’s report said Baker “did not dismiss the credibility” of the intel reports. Andrew McCabe likewise said he was struck by Lynch’s “odd” reaction to the allegations.
6) Everyone on earth knows the Clinton campaign launched a scheme to falsely claim that Trump colluded with Russia. Who on earth told you it was a good idea to now claim that never happened, or that any claims about it are Russian fabrications?
That’s beyond stupid, even for you.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 11:49
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just glad that now Trump admin can wiretap political opponents like Obama did.
Its been established as legal and Trump is good at using Democrat strategy
Obama didn't wiretap the Trump campaign.
The US intelligence operatives along with our allies monitor our enemies including Russians, Chinese and so on.
A bunch of Trump operatives, including Paul Manafort, were caught in correspondances with our enemies.
And THAT is what Trump is upset about.
Maybe ask why so many people in Trump's 2016 orbit were communicating with our enemies?
Don't know what cloud you live in.
Except Durham's report addresses the emails from the 25th and the 27th.
"But ultimately, in weighing all the evidence, Mr. Durham concluded that the Russians had probably faked the key emails, the annex shows.
“The office’s best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the U.S.-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,” it says."
Anonymous
08/01/2025 11:45
Subject: Barr and Durham
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm just glad that now Trump admin can wiretap political opponents like Obama did.
Its been established as legal and Trump is good at using Democrat strategy
Obama didn't wiretap the Trump campaign.
The US intelligence operatives along with our allies monitor our enemies including Russians, Chinese and so on.
A bunch of Trump operatives, including Paul Manafort, were caught in correspondances with our enemies.
And THAT is what Trump is upset about.
Maybe ask why so many people in Trump's 2016 orbit were communicating with our enemies?
Don't know what cloud you live in.
Anonymous
08/01/2025 11:40
Subject: Barr and Durham
The declassified Durham report annex shows the special counsel set out to prove the ‘Clinton Plan’ emails were real but decided they were fakes made by Russian spies.
It's amazing to see people talking about those "emails" as if they were real.
It's amazing to see people talking about those "emails" as if they were real.