Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if you read his page, be sure to scroll through the comments to see where Reimer posts (a few times) that neighbors in the area have repeatedly called the cops on the family for years since they've been allowing the free ranging since the younger one was a toddler. Toddler. That's according to neighbors who told Reimer.

Riemer should not be posting hearsay about that family. Not cool.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And if you read his page, be sure to scroll through the comments to see where Reimer posts (a few times) that neighbors in the area have repeatedly called the cops on the family for years since they've been allowing the free ranging since the younger one was a toddler. Toddler. That's according to neighbors who told Reimer.

Talk about hearsay. There was a comment where a neighbor called the family "odd," which has been taken down. Are you referring to another comment that has been taken down?

Anonymous wrote:And if you read his page, be sure to scroll through the comments to see where Reimer posts (a few times) that neighbors in the area have repeatedly called the cops on the family for years since they've been allowing the free ranging since the younger one was a toddler. Toddler. That's according to neighbors who told Reimer.

Anonymous wrote:And if you read his page, be sure to scroll through the comments to see where Reimer posts (a few times) that neighbors in the area have repeatedly called the cops on the family for years since they've been allowing the free ranging since the younger one was a toddler. Toddler. That's according to neighbors who told Reimer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is very clear and the lawsuit will go nowhere.

How much experience do you have practicing law, and did your law school issue a crystal ball along with the diploma?

Not PP, but I'm a lawyer and also think the suit is baseless.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

It is very clear and the lawsuit will go nowhere.

How much experience do you have practicing law, and did your law school issue a crystal ball along with the diploma?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Though it sounds a little harsh, I totally agree with the letter to the WaPo editor below:

"As a retired law enforcement officer with 38 years of experience, I think the Meitiv parents should simply send a certified letter to local, state and federal law enforcement, including Child Protective Services, relieving those agencies of any culpability in the event their children are kidnapped, molested, injured or worse during their “free-range” escapades. They should also pin a copy of that letter to their children’s outer clothing. I suspect such parents would be the first to sue law enforcement and the county in the event anything were to happen to their kids."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/should-parents-allow-their-children-to-range-freely/2015/04/16/89dd6ada-e2b7-11e4-ae0f-f8c46aa8c3a4_story.html

""Free-range" escapades" is what we're calling it now? It used to be just plain kids out being kids.

Anonymous wrote:Though it sounds a little harsh, I totally agree with the letter to the WaPo editor below:

"As a retired law enforcement officer with 38 years of experience, I think the Meitiv parents should simply send a certified letter to local, state and federal law enforcement, including Child Protective Services, relieving those agencies of any culpability in the event their children are kidnapped, molested, injured or worse during their “free-range” escapades. They should also pin a copy of that letter to their children’s outer clothing. I suspect such parents would be the first to sue law enforcement and the county in the event anything were to happen to their kids."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/should-parents-allow-their-children-to-range-freely/2015/04/16/89dd6ada-e2b7-11e4-ae0f-f8c46aa8c3a4_story.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Though it sounds a little harsh, I totally agree with the letter to the WaPo editor below:



"As a retired law enforcement officer with 38 years of experience, I think the Meitiv parents should simply send a certified letter to local, state and federal law enforcement, including Child Protective Services, relieving those agencies of any culpability in the event their children are kidnapped, molested, injured or worse during their “free-range” escapades. They should also pin a copy of that letter to their children’s outer clothing. I suspect such parents would be the first to sue law enforcement and the county in the event anything were to happen to their kids."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/should-parents-allow-their-children-to-range-freely/2015/04/16/89dd6ada-e2b7-11e4-ae0f-f8c46aa8c3a4_story.html

Unfortunately, that would have no legal effect. And we as a society generally do not accept that we should let them perish for their parents' stupidity.

Anonymous wrote:

It is very clear and the lawsuit will go nowhere.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Except the kids look homeless.

Good grief. Do you have children? Are your children always dressed in new, clean, fashionable clothes, with combed hair? If so, you're doing it wrong.

No, my kids are alway sweaty and dirty. But they don't look like a vagabond.

I get it is very Takoma Park to look like a vagabond ... But that heir cut is just wrong.

Could you please post pictures of your children? Actually, a line-up of pictures would be useful, because I'm not sure that I can reliably distinguish between sweaty/dirty and vagabond.