Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:10
Subject: Re:Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is belligerent even with the easiest questions:
“Trump said he would meet with some of the families affected by the crash. Asked by reporters whether he would visit the collision site, Trump responded: “What’s the site? The water? You want me to go swimming? I don’t have a plan to do that, but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt — with their family member, obviously.””
—WaPo
Can’t believe someone was dumb enough to actually ask him to visit the collision site. He should’ve said oh You mean in the middle of the sky?
Don't be obtuse. What do you think people mean when they talk about any accident site? How about for the Twin Towers? Are you going to crack a joke about how you can't because the building isn't there anymore? Your'e about as funny as Trump.
It’s not obtuse. If reporters want to be treated as professionals, they need to not ask stupid questions. I was called out for asking a similarly stupid question when I was taking a journalism class in college right after 9/11. I’m grateful I learned that lesson at age 20. Clearly this reporter didn’t.
How is it a stupid question? Presidents always go visit sites of tragedies in the US. Even this one has already headed out to California for the wildfires. To ask what is essentially a scheduling question to the President for something that literally would take a minimal effort (driving less than five miles) is kind of routine. Presidents in the US serve the roles of both head of government and head of state. So that means showing up in a representational role to express the country’s sorrow.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:10
Subject: Re:Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is belligerent even with the easiest questions:
“Trump said he would meet with some of the families affected by the crash. Asked by reporters whether he would visit the collision site, Trump responded: “What’s the site? The water? You want me to go swimming? I don’t have a plan to do that, but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt — with their family member, obviously.””
—WaPo
Can’t believe someone was dumb enough to actually ask him to visit the collision site. He should’ve said oh You mean in the middle of the sky?
Don't be obtuse. What do you think people mean when they talk about any accident site? How about for the Twin Towers? Are you going to crack a joke about how you can't because the building isn't there anymore? Your'e about as funny as Trump.
It’s not obtuse. If reporters want to be treated as professionals, they need to not ask stupid questions. I was called out for asking a similarly stupid question when I was taking a journalism class in college right after 9/11. I’m grateful I learned that lesson at age 20. Clearly this reporter didn’t.
The reporter did not ask stupid questions, and if you think Trump have a decent IQ, he will know what the questions mean, but he just love to make a joke over tragedy. Off course it means visiting the closest safe area near the location, it could be a moral support.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:07
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of who was flying the helicopter, there were THREE of them. Not one of them could have taken control if the lead pilot wasn't being safe? Or were paying attention on the visual separation? It seems like there's a failure in protocol, for all 3 of them. They had failed to no notice the right passenger regional jet despite several calls and confirmations.
Wasn’t one a crew chief, not a pilot?
Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:06
Subject: Re:Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is belligerent even with the easiest questions:
“Trump said he would meet with some of the families affected by the crash. Asked by reporters whether he would visit the collision site, Trump responded: “What’s the site? The water? You want me to go swimming? I don’t have a plan to do that, but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt — with their family member, obviously.””
—WaPo
Can’t believe someone was dumb enough to actually ask him to visit the collision site. He should’ve said oh You mean in the middle of the sky?
Don't be obtuse. What do you think people mean when they talk about any accident site? How about for the Twin Towers? Are you going to crack a joke about how you can't because the building isn't there anymore? Your'e about as funny as Trump.
It’s not obtuse. If reporters want to be treated as professionals, they need to not ask stupid questions. I was called out for asking a similarly stupid question when I was taking a journalism class in college right after 9/11. I’m grateful I learned that lesson at age 20. Clearly this reporter didn’t.
There have been many memorials for Alaska Airlines 261 that crashed into the ocean. All of them on land near the site of the crash. The permanent memorial is also on the beach. It is a completely normal thing to do when the water is involved - be it a major boat accident or plane crash. People still go as near to the site as possible to pay their respects and have a memorial. Same is true for any accident site that isn't easily accessible. An alternate location near the site is used as a place to visit and remember.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:03
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:They were so young, and many were traveling with their moms. It’s unimaginable.
I'm a mom and my first thought was I would have wanted to be on that plane with my kids. I can't imagine otherwise.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:03
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:I live in a different state these days. I know none of the people and I’m not involved in the sport. But these photos of the sweet figure skater kids are killing me. I don’t know why this has affected me so much when there is sad news every day. It’s just so so so sad.
I agree. I think it's because this has been an awful two weeks and something like this is worse than people could have imagined. This would be a tragedy regardless of the response, but the response has definitely made this worse. If you've ever watched The Truth Versus Alex Jones it's a similar thing - these grieving families are having nasty and untrue accusations and politics thrown in their faces at the worst moment in their lives. It really shakes your belief in the good of humanity and the notion of any sense of decency in our national's capital right now.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 07:01
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I landed at this forum after Googling my question. I apologize if this is not an acceptable means for joining in:
From the helo pilot’s point of view, if you are traveling in a direction nearly head-on with an approaching plane whose path is slowly curving to the plane’s left towards an assigned runway, isn’t a request to "pass behind the plane" dangerously ambiguous relative to whether turning left or right is a safe maneuver? If at the time of the “pass request” the approaching plane is in-sight but is headed slight left of the current path of the helo, then the helo pilot steers his craft to his right. But within a few seconds, the approaching plane’s left-curve path has crossed the old projected path of the helo and is now to the right of the helo’s path, and the helo has tried to avoid the plane’s near head-on path by choosing the wrong path to “pass behind”.
This is a great point. I do feel like ATC lacked urgency and clear direction, given the couple recordings I’ve read.
From what I have read, the tower usually reduces by one ATC at 9:30pm and then a reamining ATC manages both helicopters and planes but on this night, the other ATC left an hour early - at 8:30. It seems maybe the crash happened during this shift turnover when the ATC was still doing his job and taking over for the ATC leaving early that night.
But ATC did communicate with the helicopter a couple times. But it gave the vague direction to “go behind” the plane. But given they were flying straight on, saying go behind assumes the helicopter knew the plane was about to make a hard turn to the runway. That seems obvious- but when given directions to flying planes it seems like protocol would be to use specific direction, not behind. The helicopter and the plane aren’t on the same frequency and couldn’t communicate.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:59
Subject: Re:Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is belligerent even with the easiest questions:
“Trump said he would meet with some of the families affected by the crash. Asked by reporters whether he would visit the collision site, Trump responded: “What’s the site? The water? You want me to go swimming? I don’t have a plan to do that, but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt — with their family member, obviously.””
—WaPo
Can’t believe someone was dumb enough to actually ask him to visit the collision site. He should’ve said oh You mean in the middle of the sky?
Don't be obtuse. What do you think people mean when they talk about any accident site? How about for the Twin Towers? Are you going to crack a joke about how you can't because the building isn't there anymore? Your'e about as funny as Trump.
It’s not obtuse. If reporters want to be treated as professionals, they need to not ask stupid questions. I was called out for asking a similarly stupid question when I was taking a journalism class in college right after 9/11. I’m grateful I learned that lesson at age 20. Clearly this reporter didn’t.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:58
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I landed at this forum after Googling my question. I apologize if this is not an acceptable means for joining in:
From the helo pilot’s point of view, if you are traveling in a direction nearly head-on with an approaching plane whose path is slowly curving to the plane’s left towards an assigned runway, isn’t a request to "pass behind the plane" dangerously ambiguous relative to whether turning left or right is a safe maneuver? If at the time of the “pass request” the approaching plane is in-sight but is headed slight left of the current path of the helo, then the helo pilot steers his craft to his right. But within a few seconds, the approaching plane’s left-curve path has crossed the old projected path of the helo and is now to the right of the helo’s path, and the helo has tried to avoid the plane’s near head-on path by choosing the wrong path to “pass behind”.
I cannot follow this at all.
Both planes are flying head on. ATC says “go behind” but the direction the helicopter thought would be behind the plane turns out wasn’t bc the plane turned opposite of what helicopter was anticipated. This make a lot of sense.
The helicopter crew knew that the airplane was on approach to land. "Behind" surely would mean going on the side of the airplane that is farther away from the airport, no? Instead of trying to cut between the airplane and the airport?
I think the theory that they were just looking at the wrong airplane and didn't even see this one makes the most sense.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:36
Subject: Re:Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is belligerent even with the easiest questions:
“Trump said he would meet with some of the families affected by the crash. Asked by reporters whether he would visit the collision site, Trump responded: “What’s the site? The water? You want me to go swimming? I don’t have a plan to do that, but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt — with their family member, obviously.””
—WaPo
Can’t believe someone was dumb enough to actually ask him to visit the collision site. He should’ve said oh You mean in the middle of the sky?
He was triggered bc he actually can’t swim. His response was that of a cornered child.
ha!
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:33
Subject: Re:Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trump is belligerent even with the easiest questions:
“Trump said he would meet with some of the families affected by the crash. Asked by reporters whether he would visit the collision site, Trump responded: “What’s the site? The water? You want me to go swimming? I don’t have a plan to do that, but I will be meeting with some people that were very badly hurt — with their family member, obviously.””
—WaPo
Can’t believe someone was dumb enough to actually ask him to visit the collision site. He should’ve said oh You mean in the middle of the sky?
Don't be obtuse. What do you think people mean when they talk about any accident site? How about for the Twin Towers? Are you going to crack a joke about how you can't because the building isn't there anymore? Your'e about as funny as Trump.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:29
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I landed at this forum after Googling my question. I apologize if this is not an acceptable means for joining in:
From the helo pilot’s point of view, if you are traveling in a direction nearly head-on with an approaching plane whose path is slowly curving to the plane’s left towards an assigned runway, isn’t a request to "pass behind the plane" dangerously ambiguous relative to whether turning left or right is a safe maneuver? If at the time of the “pass request” the approaching plane is in-sight but is headed slight left of the current path of the helo, then the helo pilot steers his craft to his right. But within a few seconds, the approaching plane’s left-curve path has crossed the old projected path of the helo and is now to the right of the helo’s path, and the helo has tried to avoid the plane’s near head-on path by choosing the wrong path to “pass behind”.
This is a great point. I do feel like ATC lacked urgency and clear direction, given the couple recordings I’ve read.
From what I have read, the tower usually reduces by one ATC at 9:30pm and then a reamining ATC manages both helicopters and planes but on this night, the other ATC left an hour early - at 8:30. It seems maybe the crash happened during this shift turnover when the ATC was still doing his job and taking over for the ATC leaving early that night.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:29
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I landed at this forum after Googling my question. I apologize if this is not an acceptable means for joining in:
From the helo pilot’s point of view, if you are traveling in a direction nearly head-on with an approaching plane whose path is slowly curving to the plane’s left towards an assigned runway, isn’t a request to "pass behind the plane" dangerously ambiguous relative to whether turning left or right is a safe maneuver? If at the time of the “pass request” the approaching plane is in-sight but is headed slight left of the current path of the helo, then the helo pilot steers his craft to his right. But within a few seconds, the approaching plane’s left-curve path has crossed the old projected path of the helo and is now to the right of the helo’s path, and the helo has tried to avoid the plane’s near head-on path by choosing the wrong path to “pass behind”.
I cannot follow this at all.
Both planes are flying head on. ATC says “go behind” but the direction the helicopter thought would be behind the plane turns out wasn’t bc the plane turned opposite of what helicopter was anticipated. This make a lot of sense.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:25
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:Regardless of who was flying the helicopter, there were THREE of them. Not one of them could have taken control if the lead pilot wasn't being safe? Or were paying attention on the visual separation? It seems like there's a failure in protocol, for all 3 of them. They had failed to no notice the right passenger regional jet despite several calls and confirmations.
This confused me as well. They must have been working through a recert checklist and focused on specific skills rather than being focused on flying the helicopter. How else would 3 pilots not realize they were 200ft above the maximum altitude and about to fly directly into a jet. Given they were all experienced and had flown this route, they would know the various lines that planes take to line up for the different runways, and they have radar. Unless the night vision goggles seriously restricted their vision, most helicopters have windows on the front and sides so it isn't like you can only see lights directly ahead and not a plan coming from your right.
Anonymous
01/31/2025 06:22
Subject: Plane crash DCA?
Anonymous wrote:I landed at this forum after Googling my question. I apologize if this is not an acceptable means for joining in:
From the helo pilot’s point of view, if you are traveling in a direction nearly head-on with an approaching plane whose path is slowly curving to the plane’s left towards an assigned runway, isn’t a request to "pass behind the plane" dangerously ambiguous relative to whether turning left or right is a safe maneuver? If at the time of the “pass request” the approaching plane is in-sight but is headed slight left of the current path of the helo, then the helo pilot steers his craft to his right. But within a few seconds, the approaching plane’s left-curve path has crossed the old projected path of the helo and is now to the right of the helo’s path, and the helo has tried to avoid the plane’s near head-on path by choosing the wrong path to “pass behind”.
This is a great point. I do feel like ATC lacked urgency and clear direction, given the couple recordings I’ve read.