Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are definitely closing in on Tholen. There’s no doubt at this point they’ll at least be able to file the petition in court this summer.

Where it will be summarily shut down by the judge. Yawn.

DP. Once again, that’s really not the point. Yawn, indeed.

Yes, it is the point. All the idiots wasting their time on this think they're punishing the SB members and are that makes themselves oh so powerful. It's laughable and pathetic. Get all your cutesy little signatures, then sit back and watch as nothing happens. Buffoons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the term far left extremist keeps being thrown totally undermines the argument that this is not right wing trolling.

If they were more interested in dealing with education instead of the almost exclusive focus on social engineering and victimism, it wouldn't be an issue.

+ infinity

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the term far left extremist keeps being thrown totally undermines the argument that this is not right wing trolling.

Says the far left extremist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the term far left extremist keeps being thrown totally undermines the argument that this is not right wing trolling.

If they were more interested in dealing with education instead of the almost exclusive focus on social engineering and victimism, it wouldn't be an issue.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why recall these three?

One’s Jewish, One’s Muslim and One’s to cover so they can claim they’re not targeting the other two for not being good WASPs.

Grow up.

Y’all first. Buncha whiny toddlers soiling their diapers because they didn’t get their way. Buck up and vote against them next time- or heck run yourselves! But that would require more than passive action and y’all know YOU couldn’t take the heat once you fail to live up to your neighbors’ lofty expectations.

Stopped reading at “y’all.”

Lol same. “Y’all” in a comment like this is a dead giveaway that the person writing is an early 20 something who spends way too much time being mad on Twitter and I have no interest at all in whatever nonsensical verbal diarrhea comes next.

I think you’re severely overestimating the interest an early 20-something has in this forum.

(The poster in question is a 40- something from the south- sorry if that offends your classist wine-mom sensibilities)

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the term far left extremist keeps being thrown totally undermines the argument that this is not right wing trolling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the term far left extremist keeps being thrown totally undermines the argument that this is not right wing trolling.

Disagree. The rhetoric of at least half of the School Board members - Omeish, Frisch, Keys Gamarra, Meren, Sizemore Heizer, and Anderson - absolutely is far left. The fact that their actions rarely match their words doesn’t mean they can’t be measured by their words.

What specifically is far left?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are definitely closing in on Tholen. There’s no doubt at this point they’ll at least be able to file the petition in court this summer.

Where it will be summarily shut down by the judge. Yawn.

DP. Once again, that’s really not the point. Yawn, indeed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The fact that the term far left extremist keeps being thrown totally undermines the argument that this is not right wing trolling.

Disagree. The rhetoric of at least half of the School Board members - Omeish, Frisch, Keys Gamarra, Meren, Sizemore Heizer, and Anderson - absolutely is far left. The fact that their actions rarely match their words doesn’t mean they can’t be measured by their words.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Success can be measured different ways. It sends a message when enough residents are disgusted with a local official's behavior that they are the subject of a recall effort, especially if the effort gathers enough signatures to trigger judicial scrutiny of the official's conduct. If a new election is required, even better.

At a minimum, it appears that, by July, there will be enough signatures to recall Elaine Tholen to require her to show cause why she should not be unseated.

What does that mean? “Show cause”?

Show that she was fulfilling her duties/responsibilities as a member which should be pretty easy to do.

Depends on the judge.

doubtful, just because you do not like her votes doesn’t mean it is cause for removal.

Exactly. These openfcps people love keeping anger and division alive. There is zero chance that a recall would be successful. These members did the work, attended meetings ... they just had a different opinion. They were not negligent or absent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They are definitely closing in on Tholen. There’s no doubt at this point they’ll at least be able to file the petition in court this summer.

Where it will be summarily shut down by the judge. Yawn.

Anonymous wrote:They are definitely closing in on Tholen. There’s no doubt at this point they’ll at least be able to file the petition in court this summer.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Success can be measured different ways. It sends a message when enough residents are disgusted with a local official's behavior that they are the subject of a recall effort, especially if the effort gathers enough signatures to trigger judicial scrutiny of the official's conduct. If a new election is required, even better.

At a minimum, it appears that, by July, there will be enough signatures to recall Elaine Tholen to require her to show cause why she should not be unseated.

What does that mean? “Show cause”?

Show that she was fulfilling her duties/responsibilities as a member which should be pretty easy to do.

Depends on the judge.

doubtful, just because you do not like her votes doesn’t mean it is cause for removal.

Exactly. These openfcps people love keeping anger and division alive. There is zero chance that a recall would be successful. These members did the work, attended meetings ... they just had a different opinion. They were not negligent or absent.