Anonymous wrote:so the admissions process is toxic, the pta is toxic, there have been reports that the culture is toxic- what isn't just closing the school on the table?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm glad the state PTA has oversight and is holding them to the terms of their charter. All these backdoor sneaky dealings and backstabbing by the new board just sound wrong.
Facts simply don't matter to some people, do they?
Anonymous wrote:I'm glad the state PTA has oversight and is holding them to the terms of their charter. All these backdoor sneaky dealings and backstabbing by the new board just sound wrong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take it then that your view is that the VA PTSA should do the honorable thing and disband rather than similarly descend into politics.
As far as I can tell the letter in question, anonymously sent, was authored by a PTA officer, but was not issued as an opinion of the PTA. Since when does being an officer of a PTA cause one to lose free speech rights? It also shouldn't matter who the author consulted before issuing the letter.
It is not politics to demand that a PTSA refrain from playing politics. It’s good governance.
Why is "good governance" not similarly appropriate for the VA PTSA?
Furthermore, the TJ PTSA did not play politics. Likely you claimed that the TJ PTSA itself published several articles criticizing the new admissions policy. What and where are they? Put up or shut up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I take it then that your view is that the VA PTSA should do the honorable thing and disband rather than similarly descend into politics.
As far as I can tell the letter in question, anonymously sent, was authored by a PTA officer, but was not issued as an opinion of the PTA. Since when does being an officer of a PTA cause one to lose free speech rights? It also shouldn't matter who the author consulted before issuing the letter.
It is not politics to demand that a PTSA refrain from playing politics. It’s good governance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If the school board hadn’t launched this rushed and half-baked admissions change (with no public hearing), none of this PTSA drama would have happened. I don’t condone the behavior of many of the parties but the PTSA has been a wonderful group of very committed parent volunteers who spend many more hours volunteering to support TJ and its students than the parents at our base school.
Completely false. The leaders of the Coalition 4 TJ will stop at nothing to fight any change that could possibly limit the number of Asian students at the school. It doesn't matter what change the admissions office would have made - and making no change in a COVID year was not an option.
Making a change in the midst of Covid came across as terribly opportunistic, as if the School Board wanted to take advantage of the circumstances to ram through changes in TJ admissions at a time when there could not be in-person meetings or public hearings.
The fact that they spent 4-5 months jerking everyone around last year when they should have focused on shoring up their inadequate IT systems, paying attention to their shitty facilities so that schools would be safe for students upon return, and mitigating the obvious negative impact of distance learning on the county's most vulnerable kids speaks volumes to how out of touch these clowns are.
They should all be replaced in 2023, if not sooner.
Anonymous wrote:I take it then that your view is that the VA PTSA should do the honorable thing and disband rather than similarly descend into politics.
As far as I can tell the letter in question, anonymously sent, was authored by a PTA officer, but was not issued as an opinion of the PTA. Since when does being an officer of a PTA cause one to lose free speech rights? It also shouldn't matter who the author consulted before issuing the letter.