Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

I don't think the whole world is lying. I think the left is so wrapped up in it's own propaganda bubble, it can't even acknowledge any information coming from outside the bubble. I'm not just about Ngo here. I'm talking about anyone who doesn't 100% with 100% of the left's standard narrative.

What bubble? I get my news and information from a whole range of sources including right wing ones. And when they differ in their stories I dig deeper to get more details.

If anyone's in a bubble of propaganda, it's you because thus far you've either been unaware of much of what Andy Ngo does, or for anything not coming from a right wing source you take all of 3 milliseconds to engage in "shoot-the-messenger" mentality and try to dismiss it as "oh I'm quite sure that's entirely fake news and propaganda, and I'm sure it's been debunked" even without actually disproving any of it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

I don't think the whole world is lying. I think the left is so wrapped up in it's own propaganda bubble, it can't even acknowledge any information coming from outside the bubble. I'm not just about Ngo here. I'm talking about anyone who doesn't 100% with 100% of the left's standard narrative.

+1 that’s his actual crime. He’s not on their side, and thus must be destroyed.

Anonymous wrote:3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

I don't think the whole world is lying. I think the left is so wrapped up in it's own propaganda bubble, it can't even acknowledge any information coming from outside the bubble. I'm not just about Ngo here. I'm talking about anyone who doesn't 100% with 100% of the left's standard narrative.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

Either you do nothing but read “news” filled with inflammatory language, or you’re lying about having checked out his Twitter feed.

Pro tip: if a person calls themselves a journalist, but chooses to use a lot of emotionally-charged wording to convey a situation, you should be skeptical about what they’re saying. If they do it with a heavy political leaning, you should be even more skeptical.

Pro tip: If someone is an admitted partisan and reports on street violence, you should be mature enough to read their partisan comments without getting upset and still be able to assess the factual material independently.

I am skeptical of his claims, and you should be too. He selling a narrative. Read his book.

You don't seem like much of a skeptic at all. If you were, you'd be equally skeptical of the claims about Ngo as of Ngo himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

Either you do nothing but read “news” filled with inflammatory language, or you’re lying about having checked out his Twitter feed.

Pro tip: if a person calls themselves a journalist, but chooses to use a lot of emotionally-charged wording to convey a situation, you should be skeptical about what they’re saying. If they do it with a heavy political leaning, you should be even more skeptical.

Pro tip: If someone is an admitted partisan and reports on street violence, you should be mature enough to read their partisan comments without getting upset and still be able to assess the factual material independently.

I am skeptical of his claims, and you should be too. He selling a narrative. Read his book.

3...2...1...

"FAKE NEWS! Everyone is lying about Andy Ngo! The left hates him because he tells the truth!"


LOL. Amazing how deeply the RWNJs are wrapped up in their delusions. The whole world is lying and only Andy Ngo tells the truth. Yep sure, and the earth is flat, moon landings were faked and Elvis is still alive and married to the Sasquatch too.

Lies, lies and more lies from Andy Ngo

https://merionwest.com/2019/12/11/fact-checking-the-tweet-that-got-andy-ngo-banned-from-twitter/

Ask Andy about "Raphael Badani" and all of his other fake alt-accounts used to spread lies... Sure doesn't seem like legitimate journalism to me.

https://meaww.com/unverify-andy-ngo-right-wing-troll-fake-twitter-profiles-to-spread-lies-antifa-internet-furious

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

Either you do nothing but read “news” filled with inflammatory language, or you’re lying about having checked out his Twitter feed.

Pro tip: if a person calls themselves a journalist, but chooses to use a lot of emotionally-charged wording to convey a situation, you should be skeptical about what they’re saying. If they do it with a heavy political leaning, you should be even more skeptical.

Pro tip: If someone is an admitted partisan and reports on street violence, you should be mature enough to read their partisan comments without getting upset and still be able to assess the factual material independently.

And the factual material independently shows conclusively that Andy Ngo is a liar and a grifter. End of story.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

Either you do nothing but read “news” filled with inflammatory language, or you’re lying about having checked out his Twitter feed.

Pro tip: if a person calls themselves a journalist, but chooses to use a lot of emotionally-charged wording to convey a situation, you should be skeptical about what they’re saying. If they do it with a heavy political leaning, you should be even more skeptical.

Pro tip: If someone is an admitted partisan and reports on street violence, you should be mature enough to read their partisan comments without getting upset and still be able to assess the factual material independently.

Anonymous wrote:He pushes false claim after false claim in his dishonest "reporting" - https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/08/andy-ngo-right-wing-antifa-protest-portland-bigotry

Far too many times. For example I remember when he dishonestly pushed the story about "elderly man sucker punched by BLM" here in DC where it turned out that the "elderly man" was in fact a notorious Proud Boys street brawler and there was footage from prior to the "sucker punch" revealed that it was in fact the guy who got sucker punched who was the violent instigator and had viciously punched and stomped numerous people just prior to the retaliation that knocked him down.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can’t take him seriously because of the inflammatory language he uses. That being said, he has the right to film what protestors are doing in Portland, just like people have the right to film what the police are doing.

Give us some examples of the inflammatory language.

Feel free to buy his crappy book for all the examples you need, or check his Twitter feed.

I looked. Nothing inflammatory. Just unflattering to the left.

Either you do nothing but read “news” filled with inflammatory language, or you’re lying about having checked out his Twitter feed.

Pro tip: if a person calls themselves a journalist, but chooses to use a lot of emotionally-charged wording to convey a situation, you should be skeptical about what they’re saying. If they do it with a heavy political leaning, you should be even more skeptical.

He pushes false claim after false claim in his dishonest "reporting" - https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/08/andy-ngo-right-wing-antifa-protest-portland-bigotry

Andy Ngo is a grifter, and a dangerous one at that. He has actively colluded with dangerous far right extremists like Atomwaffen. https://emilygorcenski.com/post/andy-ngo-and-the-atomwaffen-kill-list/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There’s been no evidence of this journalist doing anything the people here have accused him of, besides a debunked Mother Jones news story and a debunked Salon news story.

Also, his book went to #1, and antifa closes down local bookstores that dare to carry the book online for sale. They want Ngo silenced for his investigative work into their actions and organization’s violence.

This entire thread is gaslighting.

Nope. Andy Ngo is the gaslighter. That's the entire issue here.

Andy Ngo is not a journalist. He is a propagandist.