Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the PTAC is that they allowed on a parent who had been literally banned from their own kid's school for celebrating violence against a child.

Was she actually banned? Like, she wasn't allowed in the door at all or she wasn't allowed volunteer status?

BANNED.

FOIA it. Incredbly humilating for the person. Totaly shunned in the community now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the PTAC is that they allowed on a parent who had been literally banned from their own kid's school for celebrating violence against a child.

Was she actually banned? Like, she wasn't allowed in the door at all or she wasn't allowed volunteer status?

BANNED.

FOIA it. Incredbly humilating for the person. Totaly shunned in the community now.

Well, obviously not totally shunned. PTAC leadership and the PTAs must think they are pretty great.

The PTAC School Board candidate forum will be very amusing this year knowing this about one of their "leaders" and after seeing leadership on private school open houses last fall.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the PTAC is that they allowed on a parent who had been literally banned from their own kid's school for celebrating violence against a child.

Was she actually banned? Like, she wasn't allowed in the door at all or she wasn't allowed volunteer status?

BANNED.

FOIA it. Incredbly humilating for the person. Totaly shunned in the community now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the PTAC is that they allowed on a parent who had been literally banned from their own kid's school for celebrating violence against a child.

Was she actually banned? Like, she wasn't allowed in the door at all or she wasn't allowed volunteer status?

Anonymous wrote:All you need to know about the PTAC is that they allowed on a parent who had been literally banned from their own kid's school for celebrating violence against a child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson and Ignacio are two of the worst candidates, worked with both, HIGHLY incompetent and DUMB.

So in other words...they will get elected.

I can’t speak to the former, but the latter has made many enemies during her tenure, so her election is not a lock.

This is Alexandria and they are part of the ACPS establishment. If they engaged in any parent shaming it will make them even more popular here. They will be elected.

Too busy shaming teachers who report to them to shame parents…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson and Ignacio are two of the worst candidates, worked with both, HIGHLY incompetent and DUMB.

So in other words...they will get elected.

I can’t speak to the former, but the latter has made many enemies during her tenure, so her election is not a lock.

This is Alexandria and they are part of the ACPS establishment. If they engaged in any parent shaming it will make them even more popular here. They will be elected.

Too busy shaming teachers who report to them to shame parents…

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson and Ignacio are two of the worst candidates, worked with both, HIGHLY incompetent and DUMB.

So in other words...they will get elected.

I can’t speak to the former, but the latter has made many enemies during her tenure, so her election is not a lock.

This is Alexandria and they are part of the ACPS establishment. If they engaged in any parent shaming it will make them even more popular here. They will be elected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson and Ignacio are two of the worst candidates, worked with both, HIGHLY incompetent and DUMB.

So in other words...they will get elected.

I can’t speak to the former, but the latter has made many enemies during her tenure, so her election is not a lock.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Johnson and Ignacio are two of the worst candidates, worked with both, HIGHLY incompetent and DUMB.

So in other words...they will get elected.

Anonymous wrote:Johnson and Ignacio are two of the worst candidates, worked with both, HIGHLY incompetent and DUMB.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am sitting here listening to the mutual administration society between Hutchings and the school board in the School Board meeting about Hutchings new contract. It is sickening. I understand the Board holding their noses and keeping Hutchings but in light of the misery this year and Hutchings’s untruthfulness and disingenuousness at times, I cannot stomach the lavish praise of him.

I thought his contact didn't get renewed until November or December. Anyway, it can't be that big of a surprise. They all think he's wonderful. That could be a good standard question for candidates - "Would you have renewed Hutchings' contract?"

And all of the incumbents should have to defend their vote.

But this is Alexandria. That won't happen.

Anonymous wrote:I am sitting here listening to the mutual administration society between Hutchings and the school board in the School Board meeting about Hutchings new contract. It is sickening. I understand the Board holding their noses and keeping Hutchings but in light of the misery this year and Hutchings’s untruthfulness and disingenuousness at times, I cannot stomach the lavish praise of him.