Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am shocked at the 530 and 600 times! I think 700 is reasonable but you have to actually train to run a mile to get those times. Sure its doable, but why? Its not reflective of soccer ability.
Most high level U13 boys teams can get their entire roster under or very close to six minutes by mid-season. No, it is not required to have constant motion and be able to run a six minute mile. But, generally, a team that has this level of endurance and speed is going to have an advantage come the 50th minute. Anyone can play hard for 15-20 minutes. Who is playing at full capacity for 70 to 90 - that's where the difference lies in soccer. It is not an endurance running skill that is required, but rather an endurance mentality and overall fitness. A basic requirement for soccer is to be in shape. To the parent who says their daughter is stressed by having to run two miles in 16 minutes - your daughter is not cut out for ECNL or really travel soccer at all, if this is true.
Next time you're at a game, please video the kids running at a constant 7:30 pace and post the link
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a competitive distance runner that also played soccer at a high level... the cut should be 7:30 or slower for both genders.
Honestly the test should be a fast 200m time and a reasonable 10K time, if we're really trying to weed out players correctly.
10K???
6.2mi, which would be close to what most would run during a full 90min's (7mi is the average). If we're testing endurance, running a 10K with a slightly above average cut off seems fair. Hence testing sprint speed (100m or 200m) and endurance. 1mi is a garbage metric for something like soccer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am shocked at the 530 and 600 times! I think 700 is reasonable but you have to actually train to run a mile to get those times. Sure its doable, but why? Its not reflective of soccer ability.
Most high level U13 boys teams can get their entire roster under or very close to six minutes by mid-season. No, it is not required to have constant motion and be able to run a six minute mile. But, generally, a team that has this level of endurance and speed is going to have an advantage come the 50th minute. Anyone can play hard for 15-20 minutes. Who is playing at full capacity for 70 to 90 - that's where the difference lies in soccer. It is not an endurance running skill that is required, but rather an endurance mentality and overall fitness. A basic requirement for soccer is to be in shape. To the parent who says their daughter is stressed by having to run two miles in 16 minutes - your daughter is not cut out for ECNL or really travel soccer at all, if this is true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a competitive distance runner that also played soccer at a high level... the cut should be 7:30 or slower for both genders.
Honestly the test should be a fast 200m time and a reasonable 10K time, if we're really trying to weed out players correctly.
10K???
Anonymous wrote:I am shocked at the 530 and 600 times! I think 700 is reasonable but you have to actually train to run a mile to get those times. Sure its doable, but why? Its not reflective of soccer ability.
Anonymous wrote:These one mile and two mile runs are completely stupid. There are no premier teams that incorporate either into their tryouts. Only High School teams do this. I went through this with all three of my kids. My youngest is dealing with it today. She has to run 2 miles in under 16 minutes. This is a girl who plays holding mid for an ECNL team and rarely if ever comes out of a game. She is a high endurance kid. The two mile run put unnecessary mental and physical stress on a young athlete and should not be allowed. This isn’t track it’s soccer.soccer is a sprint recovery game, not a distance runner game. I know some people will say you run 3-5 miles a game, but not all at once.
Anonymous wrote:As a competitive distance runner that also played soccer at a high level... the cut should be 7:30 or slower for both genders.
Honestly the test should be a fast 200m time and a reasonable 10K time, if we're really trying to weed out players correctly.
Anonymous wrote:These one mile and two mile runs are completely stupid. There are no premier teams that incorporate either into their tryouts. Only High School teams do this. I went through this with all three of my kids. My youngest is dealing with it today. She has to run 2 miles in under 16 minutes. This is a girl who plays holding mid for an ECNL team and rarely if ever comes out of a game. She is a high endurance kid. The two mile run put unnecessary mental and physical stress on a young athlete and should not be allowed. This isn’t track it’s soccer.soccer is a sprint recovery game, not a distance runner game. I know some people will say you run 3-5 miles a game, but not all at once.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense at all. thats like saying if cant juggle 50 times your cut. gamers can game straight up.. and what about goalies no need for either.
Premier teams INVITE players to try out. High schools is an open call.
Timed runs eliminate players.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Makes no sense at all. thats like saying if cant juggle 50 times your cut. gamers can game straight up.. and what about goalies no need for either.
Gamers can run a 5:30 mile.
what about goalie
Most are also good field players (assuming you aren’t referring to the fat kid who gets stuck there around U10