Anonymous wrote:So what is the class size and range of grades given in honors for all? Dies every student receive an increased gpa?
Anonymous wrote:I think the decision was centered on the disadvantaged students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, just maybe, the people on this listserve should ask how the students (and parents of the students) who will now be mandated to take these classes feel? Do they think it's a good idea? Are they excited? Hopeful? Upset? Outraged?
Maybe, just maybe, it shouldn't be centered around how those who are privileged by the current system feel about the changes without knowing how those who are disadvantaged feel....
This! The curriculum should be set by students’ feelings!
I assume this is sarcasm...and that you think that the curriculum should be set by the privileged families of the kids who have the greatest chance of succeeding in a broken system.
I think the curriculum should be set by adults looking out, first and foremost, for the educational interests of all the individual students.
I don’t think adults who come up with faux, superficial solutions to complex problems putting education first. See the PPs above who articulate clearly the dishonesty of the “AP for All” scheme.
Right...but I think the point of the previous poster was that we should be centering the conversation around what the families of the disadvantaged kids think about this policy, not what we think.
I am not sure why. Wilson has 2000 students and they should all count. I am not sure why educating kids must be a zero sum thing, where some kids gain only if others are screwed. issues that people have raised on this thread are relevant for many normal kids, not just the one Nobel-prize-in -waiting genius.
I do agree that all voices should be heard and certainly those of disadvantage kids too. Did the school organize a school wide zoom conference? an open air meeting somewhere? did they ask the community to give input, discuss, ask questions, raise concern (and I include families of disadvantage kids, who will be affected by this change)? absolutely not. just a surprised email on a Sunday night and that's it. so instead of blaming the privileged white parents on DCUM, it was the principal and the school itself that did not give a damn about what families think, including families of disadvantage children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wondering what folks think about this decision and will it impact what your junior decides to take?
If you think it means that they are going to somehow "dumb down" the class in ways that seem to perturb the wealthy parents of the neighborhood - remember that APs are a set curriculum. It's a good thing they are trying to make it more accessible. Nothing really to see here.
Isn't the majority of Wilson filled with students coming from wealthy white families with resources? Everyone in NW seems to have gifted kids. Why would anything need to be dumbed down. 95% of the student body should be able to fulfill honors/AP requirements easily.
https://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/Woodrow+Wilson+High+School
(2019 - 2020) 39% white
(2018 - 2019) 32% met/exceeded expectations in math
(2018 - 2019) 38% met/exceeded expectations in english language arts
A HUGE number of kids boycotted PARCC in 2019...
Same poster. How in the heck are only 3% of students exceeding expectations in maths?
because there are a lot of students at Wilson who get to HS significantly behind in math and cannot do work at grade level. there are a bunch of kids who are not at grade level in English. the school should work to bring these students at grade level so they can do well. instead, they will be thrown into an AP class requiring extensive reading and writing assignments and be told to swim.
But 39% of Wilson is white, and most white people in DC come from well resourced families who can provide. How can only 3% of the student body be exceeding expectations in math?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, just maybe, the people on this listserve should ask how the students (and parents of the students) who will now be mandated to take these classes feel? Do they think it's a good idea? Are they excited? Hopeful? Upset? Outraged?
Maybe, just maybe, it shouldn't be centered around how those who are privileged by the current system feel about the changes without knowing how those who are disadvantaged feel....
This! The curriculum should be set by students’ feelings!
I assume this is sarcasm...and that you think that the curriculum should be set by the privileged families of the kids who have the greatest chance of succeeding in a broken system.
I think the curriculum should be set by adults looking out, first and foremost, for the educational interests of all the individual students.
I don’t think adults who come up with faux, superficial solutions to complex problems putting education first. See the PPs above who articulate clearly the dishonesty of the “AP for All” scheme.
Right...but I think the point of the previous poster was that we should be centering the conversation around what the families of the disadvantaged kids think about this policy, not what we think.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wondering what folks think about this decision and will it impact what your junior decides to take?
If you think it means that they are going to somehow "dumb down" the class in ways that seem to perturb the wealthy parents of the neighborhood - remember that APs are a set curriculum. It's a good thing they are trying to make it more accessible. Nothing really to see here.
Isn't the majority of Wilson filled with students coming from wealthy white families with resources? Everyone in NW seems to have gifted kids. Why would anything need to be dumbed down. 95% of the student body should be able to fulfill honors/AP requirements easily.
https://profiles.dcps.dc.gov/Woodrow+Wilson+High+School
(2019 - 2020) 39% white
(2018 - 2019) 32% met/exceeded expectations in math
(2018 - 2019) 38% met/exceeded expectations in english language arts
Same poster. How in the heck are only 3% of students exceeding expectations in maths?
because there are a lot of students at Wilson who get to HS significantly behind in math and cannot do work at grade level. there are a bunch of kids who are not at grade level in English. the school should work to bring these students at grade level so they can do well. instead, they will be thrown into an AP class requiring extensive reading and writing assignments and be told to swim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, just maybe, the people on this listserve should ask how the students (and parents of the students) who will now be mandated to take these classes feel? Do they think it's a good idea? Are they excited? Hopeful? Upset? Outraged?
Maybe, just maybe, it shouldn't be centered around how those who are privileged by the current system feel about the changes without knowing how those who are disadvantaged feel....
This! The curriculum should be set by students’ feelings!
I assume this is sarcasm...and that you think that the curriculum should be set by the privileged families of the kids who have the greatest chance of succeeding in a broken system.
I think the curriculum should be set by adults looking out, first and foremost, for the educational interests of all the individual students.
I don’t think adults who come up with faux, superficial solutions to complex problems putting education first. See the PPs above who articulate clearly the dishonesty of the “AP for All” scheme.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, just maybe, the people on this listserve should ask how the students (and parents of the students) who will now be mandated to take these classes feel? Do they think it's a good idea? Are they excited? Hopeful? Upset? Outraged?
Maybe, just maybe, it shouldn't be centered around how those who are privileged by the current system feel about the changes without knowing how those who are disadvantaged feel....
This! The curriculum should be set by students’ feelings!
I assume this is sarcasm...and that you think that the curriculum should be set by the privileged families of the kids who have the greatest chance of succeeding in a broken system.
I think the curriculum should be set by adults looking out, first and foremost, for the educational interests of all the individual students.
I don’t think adults who come up with faux, superficial solutions to complex problems putting education first. See the PPs above who articulate clearly the dishonesty of the “AP for All” scheme.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, just maybe, the people on this listserve should ask how the students (and parents of the students) who will now be mandated to take these classes feel? Do they think it's a good idea? Are they excited? Hopeful? Upset? Outraged?
Maybe, just maybe, it shouldn't be centered around how those who are privileged by the current system feel about the changes without knowing how those who are disadvantaged feel....
This! The curriculum should be set by students’ feelings!
I assume this is sarcasm...and that you think that the curriculum should be set by the privileged families of the kids who have the greatest chance of succeeding in a broken system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe, just maybe, the people on this listserve should ask how the students (and parents of the students) who will now be mandated to take these classes feel? Do they think it's a good idea? Are they excited? Hopeful? Upset? Outraged?
Maybe, just maybe, it shouldn't be centered around how those who are privileged by the current system feel about the changes without knowing how those who are disadvantaged feel....
This! The curriculum should be set by students’ feelings!