Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For goodness sake there are hundreds of thousands of books out there to choose from. If you really want this particular book go to one of the online used book sellers. Or just wait a while til it’s out of copyright and then publish it yourself.
Impossible to find them.
I’m sorry your internet is broken. Here you go - enjoy!
https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?sts=t&cm_sp=SearchF-_-home-_-Results&an=Seuss&tn=Mulberry+street&kn=&isbn=
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did everyone gloss over my transcript from the View today?
Joy and Whoopi...the most liberal members of the bunch...both thought getting rid of the books was wrong. Both felt it’s better to use art (including these books) for discussion to foster understanding. Flag when the books were written, acknowledge it was a different time, highlight the racism, discuss why it’s racist, and affirm that we know better now.
Again: these are liberal voices saying this is going too far. These are not conservatives. These are not racists.
They are admittedly older, and I suspect there might be a generational divide on this topic. But these are comics who value free speech and abhor censorship. They also believe it’s better to talk about issues instead of bury them. There’s value in learning from past mistakes.
Who is doing the censoring?
If they want to read these to their children no one is stopping them.
Are you suggesting parents MUST read these books, that you want to force people to read them?
Anonymous wrote:Here you go, OP. Better start yelling at Steven King and Madonna and Carl Sagan and Nora Roberts and Norman Rockwell and Madonna and all the other authors of books that have gone out of print. For varying reasons, every single one of these books are out of print, but lo and behold, still available for purchase.
https://www.bookfinder.com/books/bookfinder_report/BookFinder_Report_2013.mhtml
What a ridiculous thing to be upset about.
mAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For goodness sake there are hundreds of thousands of books out there to choose from. If you really want this particular book go to one of the online used book sellers. Or just wait a while til it’s out of copyright and then publish it yourself.
Impossible to find them.
Contact the publisher and purchase the rights.
How much are the rights? Is it $9.99 like the books or a little higher?
Anonymous wrote:Did everyone gloss over my transcript from the View today?
Joy and Whoopi...the most liberal members of the bunch...both thought getting rid of the books was wrong. Both felt it’s better to use art (including these books) for discussion to foster understanding. Flag when the books were written, acknowledge it was a different time, highlight the racism, discuss why it’s racist, and affirm that we know better now.
Again: these are liberal voices saying this is going too far. These are not conservatives. These are not racists.
They are admittedly older, and I suspect there might be a generational divide on this topic. But these are comics who value free speech and abhor censorship. They also believe it’s better to talk about issues instead of bury them. There’s value in learning from past mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For goodness sake there are hundreds of thousands of books out there to choose from. If you really want this particular book go to one of the online used book sellers. Or just wait a while til it’s out of copyright and then publish it yourself.
Impossible to find them.
Contact the publisher and purchase the rights.
How much are the rights? Is it $9.99 like the books or a little higher?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For goodness sake there are hundreds of thousands of books out there to choose from. If you really want this particular book go to one of the online used book sellers. Or just wait a while til it’s out of copyright and then publish it yourself.
Impossible to find them.
Anonymous wrote:Did everyone gloss over my transcript from the View today?
Joy and Whoopi...the most liberal members of the bunch...both thought getting rid of the books was wrong. Both felt it’s better to use art (including these books) for discussion to foster understanding. Flag when the books were written, acknowledge it was a different time, highlight the racism, discuss why it’s racist, and affirm that we know better now.
Again: these are liberal voices saying this is going too far. These are not conservatives. These are not racists.
They are admittedly older, and I suspect there might be a generational divide on this topic. But these are comics who value free speech and abhor censorship. They also believe it’s better to talk about issues instead of bury them. There’s value in learning from past mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Did everyone gloss over my transcript from the View today?
Joy and Whoopi...the most liberal members of the bunch...both thought getting rid of the books was wrong. Both felt it’s better to use art (including these books) for discussion to foster understanding. Flag when the books were written, acknowledge it was a different time, highlight the racism, discuss why it’s racist, and affirm that we know better now.
Again: these are liberal voices saying this is going too far. These are not conservatives. These are not racists.
They are admittedly older, and I suspect there might be a generational divide on this topic. But these are comics who value free speech and abhor censorship. They also believe it’s better to talk about issues instead of bury them. There’s value in learning from past mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:I would LOVE to know how much overlap there is between people like the OP, who is so deeply concerned about this censorship, and those who don't want books like "Heather Has Two Mommies" available for kids to read at the library.
I'm confident it's close to 100%.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You're a "liberal Democrat" like I'm the Queen of Sheba. Primarily, you need to learn what exactly censorship is.
That’s just rude?
I am a registered Democrat. Maybe you’re right that I’m not on the very farthest of the left at this point, because if this is what they want, I disagree.
But to do away with all potentially hurtful stereotypes portrayed throughout our history of literature and media is a slippery slope. How is this line about Chopsticks more hurtful than all of the “dumb blonde bimbo” tropes. Is Legally Blonde next to be shelved? (I’m trying to be lighthearted, about something that really does scare me for the future).