Anonymous wrote:
I guess we should just forget that Texas put out the exact same type of tweet a few days ago? Or maybe just ignore that they're basic simple steps, the kind of which everybody in Texas should be doing. In Texas they asked for heat below 68. Everywhere has different habitats. California for instance is very dry. Hence the wildfires. Hence the need for energy conservation.
Great, it's a funny joke. He pwned the libs again. Now how about trying to solve the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Yep ERCOT's chair and vice chair living in California and Michigan respectively.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given the state of oil in the future, Texas really doesn't have a lot to offer, other than Austin. If they think this through and really want to go, so be it.
You sure? Have you looked at the Texan industrial base? Texas exports more technology than California! Huge agriculture sector too. Ports, and a border with Mexico.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Given the state of oil in the future, Texas really doesn't have a lot to offer, other than Austin. If they think this through and really want to go, so be it.
You sure? Have you looked at the Texan industrial base? Texas exports more technology than California! Huge agriculture sector too. Ports, and a border with Mexico.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember when Ted Cruz and the Texan delegation denied aid to NY for superstorm Sandy? Remember when Cruz and the Republicans refused any aid for the states in the covid relief bill? Remember when they said DC could only get 3/5? Remember when they didnt give any aid to Puerto Rico? Remember when Trump refused to give aid to parts of the country that didn't support him? I remember
F--- Ted Cruz. I have friends in Texas who are working hard to make Texas blue, they deserve help.
Anonymous wrote:Given the state of oil in the future, Texas really doesn't have a lot to offer, other than Austin. If they think this through and really want to go, so be it.