Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rambling response from Loft. She acknowledged what she said in August but said they don’t have teacher staffing to support hybrid for everyone. Also, Pope’s MS Teams picture is highly unprofessional.
Translation:
"We don't have what we need to make our vision of hybrid learning work, so instead you're going to get a worse model of it that I, myself, said wasn't appropriate for upper elementary."
Loft needs to go. She was behind the decision to stop teaching this spring. She also instructed principals not to make classroom assignments based on hybrid/DL elections even thought many parents raised with her that this would be a huge issue. She makes the wrong call at every turn. Cut her loose already, Duran!
The decision not to teach new material was based on a lot of things, as far as I can tell. The county did not have infrastructure for live virtual instruction (Teams). The staff weren’t trained on how to use it, and many had not even used Canvas all that much. She didn’t want older kids’ grades to suffer by being held accountable to that. I think there was a pony in that first month or so when no one really knew how long this would last.
Please. Could’ve at least not prohibited new instruction, which is what she did. Teachers who were teaching were stopped in their tracks. Could’ve suspended grades and still folded 4th quarter into the next year without just dropping all new instruction. It was absurd.
Anonymous wrote:So could APS handle if all kids were hybrid? That is unfortunately a possibility for fall. What is needed? Additional transportation, teachers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rambling response from Loft. She acknowledged what she said in August but said they don’t have teacher staffing to support hybrid for everyone. Also, Pope’s MS Teams picture is highly unprofessional.
Translation:
"We don't have what we need to make our vision of hybrid learning work, so instead you're going to get a worse model of it that I, myself, said wasn't appropriate for upper elementary."
Loft needs to go. She was behind the decision to stop teaching this spring. She also instructed principals not to make classroom assignments based on hybrid/DL elections even thought many parents raised with her that this would be a huge issue. She makes the wrong call at every turn. Cut her loose already, Duran!
The decision not to teach new material was based on a lot of things, as far as I can tell. The county did not have infrastructure for live virtual instruction (Teams). The staff weren’t trained on how to use it, and many had not even used Canvas all that much. She didn’t want older kids’ grades to suffer by being held accountable to that. I think there was a pony in that first month or so when no one really knew how long this would last.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Going half the day either AM or PM with neither group eating AT school would be good except for the childcare issue it creates which is why it won’t happen.
What difference is this to back in the day when there was half day Kindergarten. You either went in the morning or afternoon. Folks made it work. I was in this group in 1985 and this was an era where women worked so not too many stay at home moms. Lower income families tend to have multiple generations living in one home so childcare is less problematic for them. This can be a business venture for someone just as the pod finding agencies that started up. They can offer afterschool care or before at some fee, and people will pay it, or who ever is watching their kid during DL now will continue.
Because they can only put 11 kids on a bus to maintain distancing and there aren't enough buses to run this with the overlapping transit times.
Does anyone know how they came up with the 11 number? Sports teams are able to fit 20 to a bus but for school it can only be 11??
APS sports?
Anonymous wrote:So, for clarity:
K-2 hybrid means kids come in two days a week and are spread between 2 physical classrooms. The teacher is in 1 rom half the time while the assistant is in the other room. On their home days, those students are taught by the same teacher online. Families who chose virtual will have a virtual only teacher. Some students will change teachers.
3-5: Hybrid means kids will still be in person two days a a week, but the class will be split into two in-person groups so they aren't using 2 physical classrooms for each group. On home days, the in-person students will be taught online along with the rest of the class (hybrid or virtual) by the same teacher who is teaching everyone at the same time. The teacher may or may not be in the building.
Do I understand this correctly? If so, it sounds like a physical space problem as much as a staffing problem. It sounds like more families in the upper grades chose hybrid than expected and there just wouldn't be space for the same model as the k-2 plan. I know my school has zero extra classrooms, so this doesn't surprise me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rambling response from Loft. She acknowledged what she said in August but said they don’t have teacher staffing to support hybrid for everyone. Also, Pope’s MS Teams picture is highly unprofessional.
Translation:
"We don't have what we need to make our vision of hybrid learning work, so instead you're going to get a worse model of it that I, myself, said wasn't appropriate for upper elementary."
Loft needs to go. She was behind the decision to stop teaching this spring. She also instructed principals not to make classroom assignments based on hybrid/DL elections even thought many parents raised with her that this would be a huge issue. She makes the wrong call at every turn. Cut her loose already, Duran!
The decision not to teach new material was based on a lot of things, as far as I can tell. The county did not have infrastructure for live virtual instruction (Teams). The staff weren’t trained on how to use it, and many had not even used Canvas all that much. She didn’t want older kids’ grades to suffer by being held accountable to that. I think there was a pony in that first month or so when no one really knew how long this would last.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rambling response from Loft. She acknowledged what she said in August but said they don’t have teacher staffing to support hybrid for everyone. Also, Pope’s MS Teams picture is highly unprofessional.
Translation:
"We don't have what we need to make our vision of hybrid learning work, so instead you're going to get a worse model of it that I, myself, said wasn't appropriate for upper elementary."
Loft needs to go. She was behind the decision to stop teaching this spring. She also instructed principals not to make classroom assignments based on hybrid/DL elections even thought many parents raised with her that this would be a huge issue. She makes the wrong call at every turn. Cut her loose already, Duran!
Anonymous wrote:So, for clarity:
K-2 hybrid means kids come in two days a week and are spread between 2 physical classrooms. The teacher is in 1 rom half the time while the assistant is in the other room. On their home days, those students are taught by the same teacher online. Families who chose virtual will have a virtual only teacher. Some students will change teachers.
3-5: Hybrid means kids will still be in person two days a a week, but the class will be split into two in-person groups so they aren't using 2 physical classrooms for each group. On home days, the in-person students will be taught online along with the rest of the class (hybrid or virtual) by the same teacher who is teaching everyone at the same time. The teacher may or may not be in the building.
Do I understand this correctly? If so, it sounds like a physical space problem as much as a staffing problem. It sounds like more families in the upper grades chose hybrid than expected and there just wouldn't be space for the same model as the k-2 plan. I know my school has zero extra classrooms, so this doesn't surprise me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Going half the day either AM or PM with neither group eating AT school would be good except for the childcare issue it creates which is why it won’t happen.
What difference is this to back in the day when there was half day Kindergarten. You either went in the morning or afternoon. Folks made it work. I was in this group in 1985 and this was an era where women worked so not too many stay at home moms. Lower income families tend to have multiple generations living in one home so childcare is less problematic for them. This can be a business venture for someone just as the pod finding agencies that started up. They can offer afterschool care or before at some fee, and people will pay it, or who ever is watching their kid during DL now will continue.
Because they can only put 11 kids on a bus to maintain distancing and there aren't enough buses to run this with the overlapping transit times.
Does anyone know how they came up with the 11 number? Sports teams are able to fit 20 to a bus but for school it can only be 11??
APS sports?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rambling response from Loft. She acknowledged what she said in August but said they don’t have teacher staffing to support hybrid for everyone. Also, Pope’s MS Teams picture is highly unprofessional.
Translation:
"We don't have what we need to make our vision of hybrid learning work, so instead you're going to get a worse model of it that I, myself, said wasn't appropriate for upper elementary."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rambling response from Loft. She acknowledged what she said in August but said they don’t have teacher staffing to support hybrid for everyone. Also, Pope’s MS Teams picture is highly unprofessional.
Translation:
"We don't have what we need to make our vision of hybrid learning work, so instead you're going to get a worse model of it that I, myself, said wasn't appropriate for upper elementary."