Anonymous wrote:My school wants to charge 50%. I don't think it enforceable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our daycare just announced they won’t be charging tuition for the remainder of the shutdown (we hd only paid through March). I think they are also saying that teachers can babysit for families. And I’m sure they will request donations to help the nonprofit stay afloat. We will donate as much as we can.
They aren’t coming back.
Anonymous wrote:Our daycare just announced they won’t be charging tuition for the remainder of the shutdown (we hd only paid through March). I think they are also saying that teachers can babysit for families. And I’m sure they will request donations to help the nonprofit stay afloat. We will donate as much as we can.
Anonymous wrote:it's ridiculous to expect parents to pay for services they are not receiving, while their children still need care.
And please keep in mind, some of the teachers are working with families on the side as well during the closing.
A donation would be more appropriate, but being closed for months on end and expecting payment is nonsensical.
Anonymous wrote:it's ridiculous to expect parents to pay for services they are not receiving, while their children still need care.
And please keep in mind, some of the teachers are working with families on the side as well during the closing.
A donation would be more appropriate, but being closed for months on end and expecting payment is nonsensical.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This topic has shifted quite a bit to discussing the actual profit margin’s of the day cares themselves. You HAVE to look at this objectively. Meaning are you paying for a service, and are you receiving that service? And what does the contract say. It does not matter if it is a daycare, personal trainer, lawyers office, or anything else.
+1. I personally think parents who can (eg not if you've gotten laid off or had to hire a nanny) should continue to pay as a donation if they are told and trust that it will mean teachers will continue to get paid. But to be actually charged for service you aren't receiving and threatened with losing your spot? That's absurd.
I’ll disagree and say this is not an objective matter. You have to look at it ethically. My ethics say these are people who deeply care about my child and I will continue to pay to support them even if I’m not actively using their service. Your ethics may dictate different behavior.
What I'm hearing you say is that you think parents should be forced to pay, while I am saying parents should pay if they can. So if a parent needs to hire a nanny because they are healthcare workers, you think they should continue to also pay for their closed daycare? Sorry, but that's absurd and self-centered.
I’m the ethics PP and was responding to the first poster quoted here. I said nothing about anything you suggested in bold. I said my ethical standpoint is that I am continuing to pay for services that I’m not receiving.