Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting thread on how Bloomberg actually buys votes and buys friends.......

Every politician does this. The difference is that it is with HIS money - he owes no Russian monsters favours because he could only fund his campaign with blood money. We know this about Kennedy too, their wealth largely associated with bootlegging. So it’s nothing new. Someone had to buy something.

Technically, Americans are ponying you the dollars that an elite few use to buy their own interests, not ours. the corporations fund the super PACs. American tax payers fund the corporations. So this is a matter of one man using his money or one man using our money, and probably inheriting a crap load of IOUs for the “favour”.

I’m fine with his $60B+ net worth, fine that he is short, fine that he apologized for the stop and frisk to the black community, fine with him being a business mogul with news and media outlets, fine with him serving time cleaning up after dirty Guiliani.

We need Trump and this dirty Trump Train to depart from this station.

Maybe they can go to Russia since they wear T-shirts’ that say I’d rather be a Russian than a Democrat?
Or maybe they can go to Russia since that is where they chose to celebrate the UNITED States of America during our 4th of July Independence Day celebration?

Whatcha think?

By the way - Bloomberg built his wealth and his money is CLEAN. It doesn’t need to be LAUNDERED. His worse tape is a public discussion on stop and frisk. Teumps worst tape is one that the Russians are holding over his head so that he will do their bidding.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting thread on how Bloomberg actually buys votes and buys friends.......

Every politician does this. The difference is that it is with HIS money - he owes no Russian monsters favours because he could only fund his campaign with blood money. We know this about Kennedy too, their wealth largely associated with bootlegging. So it’s nothing new. Someone had to buy something.

Technically, Americans are ponying you the dollars that an elite few use to buy their own interests, not ours. the corporations fund the super PACs. American tax payers fund the corporations. So this is a matter of one man using his money or one man using our money, and probably inheriting a crap load of IOUs for the “favour”.

I’m fine with his $60B+ net worth, fine that he is short, fine that he apologized for the stop and frisk to the black community, fine with him being a business mogul with news and media outlets, fine with him serving time cleaning up after dirty Guiliani.

We need Trump and this dirty Trump Train to depart from this station.

Maybe they can go to Russia since they wear T-shirts’ that say I’d rather be a Russian than a Democrat?
Or maybe they can go to Russia since that is where they chose to celebrate the UNITED States of America during our 4th of July Independence Day celebration?

Whatcha think?

Interesting thread on how Bloomberg actually buys votes and buys friends.......

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will probably vote for Bloomberg. I would've done so without him spending much money. Liberals still have not learned that you can't win the election with support from just the coastal blue areas. You need a moderate.

African-Americans figured that out a week after he announced he was running. Also. he was the only one who could afford to beat Trump. This is no different than Republicans overlooking Trump's significant and some dangerous flaws because their 401k went up. All about the investment.

Guess you heard the Congressional Black Caucus endorsed Bloomberg last night. Going with the highest return.

Actually, we knew it all along. We have always been a minority and are used to not getting 100% but learning to optimize the % allocated to you. Thanks America!

Bloomberg attracts both sides because he
- he was an INDEPENDENT from 2008-2019; Democrat before 2007
- support portfolio growth, financial literacy, international reputation strongly regarded amongst world markets
- support ECONOMIC GROWTH (something Trump is hurting!!) that will threaten that 3% yield mark we like to get cushy with
- support climate change, women’s rights
- support bi-partisanship as a moderate; will get Washington working again
- support anti-bullying, anti-treason, anti-Russia, anti-klan, ant-nazi, anti-racism (and can speak from growth since his birth in 1942)
- demonstrates 10yrs public service as mayor cleaning up NYC 2002-2013. Cleaned up after Giuliani before and can do it again!
- epitome of the American dream: from rags to riches without bankruptcy, housing violations, etc

....

He’s the winning ticket.
We know you need someone who will WIN. You want the best of the worst options. It’s rare you get solely what you want.

But no one asks black voters anything ever. You think that CBC, Pastors, Obama, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharptoo whoever else - represents all voices. No more than Yang represents all Asians.

But, people are coming around to faulty thinking and hopefully it just better reflects areas where we can improve the narrative.

The key with MR B is his VP. Who will he appeal to with a VP? Also, what will his team look like?

I can’t wait to watch the Presidential debate with Bloomberg vs Trump! He will speak with clarity, precision, wit, and shut down bullying. It’s great to see how he stands up to someone making fun of him, bullying, when everyone else plays Teump’s puppet game.

As much as I loce other ideologies and candidates on the left, I know it won’t bring stability and it will be too much of a fight... now. Hillary waited a lonnng tome for ACA and it happened! Slow and steady wins the race and we have to work together and root out the corruption and revolt against evil. Public servants are the heart of my hometown: DMV.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Looks like he has the balls to stand up to the orange loser:

And this will catch people’s attention. Bloomberg is a fighter.

Bloomberg is a racist cis-gender white male who partnered with trump's lawyer Giuliani to implement racist policies across NYC.

#BloombergIsRacist

Trump liked it, though.

Anonymous wrote:I think the real question is what a Bloomberg nomination means for the democratic party's identity. It would be like the election is essentially between two Republicans. The barometer has been moved.

This happens throughout history in politics. People say Honest Abraham Lincoln, who was the first Republican president probably would be a Democrat in 2020 if he had to associate with the right or left. Originally, Democrats wanted slavery and were largely in the south 100yrs post civil war. As time progresses, so does our national identity. Note that huge shifts occur when morality comes into play; balancing love of people and love of money. Protecting freedom and security while encouraging growth and independence. Key shifts happened in administrations under Nixon, now Trump, probably because of their scandals.

Proposed slogan:
“Bloomberg, the candidate for Democrats who have learned even less than Buttigieg supporters!”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I will probably vote for Bloomberg. I would've done so without him spending much money. Liberals still have not learned that you can't win the election with support from just the coastal blue areas. You need a moderate.

African-Americans figured that out a week after he announced he was running. Also. he was the only one who could afford to beat Trump. This is no different than Republicans overlooking Trump's significant and some dangerous flaws because their 401k went up. All about the investment.

Guess you heard the Congressional Black Caucus endorsed Bloomberg last night. Going with the highest return.

How was it that his last opponent couldn’t “afford” to beat Trump? Apparently it takes a lot more than endless cash. But never mind reality.

Anonymous wrote:I will probably vote for Bloomberg. I would've done so without him spending much money. Liberals still have not learned that you can't win the election with support from just the coastal blue areas. You need a moderate.

African-Americans figured that out a week after he announced he was running. Also. he was the only one who could afford to beat Trump. This is no different than Republicans overlooking Trump's significant and some dangerous flaws because their 401k went up. All about the investment.

Guess you heard the Congressional Black Caucus endorsed Bloomberg last night. Going with the highest return.

I think the real question is what a Bloomberg nomination means for the democratic party's identity. It would be like the election is essentially between two Republicans. The barometer has been moved.

Bloomberg is so old he looks like a wax figure of himself that is melting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:if he wins get I think Muriel Bowser will be the VP

that will be an effing disaster.

WHY? because another mayor?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As trite as it sounds, I read the recent Twitter duel with Bloomberg and Trump. Trump started it and Bloomberg finished it. I don't like Trump's attacks on physical attributes (glass house?) but I love Bloomberg fighting back because everyone else is afraid. Now, Trump is angry. Don't give it if you can't take it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-obsesses-over-loser-mike-bloomberg-54-mass-of-dead-energy/amp/

I am not a fan of Bloomberg, never have been. But I admit to enjoying his takedowns of Spanky. You know Spanky hates him because Bloomberg is a real billionaire not a fake one. And that makes me happy.

Lol at Mini Mike.

Trump knows that Bloomberg will beat him. So he’s nervous.

This would be a fun election to watch. Bloomberg is completely unafraid of Trump unlike a lot of candidates (which I never understand). Bloomberg tries to bait Trump all the time, and I think Trump actually tries to ignore it but he couldn’t this time. Lol.

Now THAT is good reality TV!! Can’t wait for Mike Bloomberg to tell Trump: YOU’RE FIRED!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As trite as it sounds, I read the recent Twitter duel with Bloomberg and Trump. Trump started it and Bloomberg finished it. I don't like Trump's attacks on physical attributes (glass house?) but I love Bloomberg fighting back because everyone else is afraid. Now, Trump is angry. Don't give it if you can't take it.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.mediaite.com/trump/trump-obsesses-over-loser-mike-bloomberg-54-mass-of-dead-energy/amp/

I am not a fan of Bloomberg, never have been. But I admit to enjoying his takedowns of Spanky. You know Spanky hates him because Bloomberg is a real billionaire not a fake one. And that makes me happy.

Me too!!

Anonymous wrote:if he wins get I think Muriel Bowser will be the VP

that will be an effing disaster.