Anonymous wrote:Ok, so what do I need to invest in to get rich? PP with $50 million, how did you start investing? I am from Eastern Europe and really dumb about these things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:40 & 42. Net worth about 1.35. And I thought that was good. Ya'll are killin' it out here.
LOL I'm thinking the same
39/40 1.5M (no help/inheritance/or family money)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, so what do I need to invest in to get rich? PP with $50 million, how did you start investing? I am from Eastern Europe and really dumb about these things.
Polish?
Anonymous wrote:Ok, so what do I need to invest in to get rich? PP with $50 million, how did you start investing? I am from Eastern Europe and really dumb about these things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:36, negative maybe 700K because of a mortgage. If you take that out it's positive 500K, but that's no how I think of things.
The mortgage is not a liability unless the house is worth no money. To include mortgage you would add the value of your home to your NW and then subtract the mortgage balance
Safer (as in more conservative) to not add the house. You'll always need a place to stay in..
Safer, but incorrect. Net worth has one definition: assets minus liabilities. Counting the liability but not the asset is not net worth.[/quote
My "safer" suggestion was to leave out both..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:36, negative maybe 700K because of a mortgage. If you take that out it's positive 500K, but that's no how I think of things.
The mortgage is not a liability unless the house is worth no money. To include mortgage you would add the value of your home to your NW and then subtract the mortgage balance
Safer (as in more conservative) to not add the house. You'll always need a place to stay in..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:40 & 42. Net worth about 1.35. And I thought that was good. Ya'll are killin' it out here.
LOL I'm thinking the same
39/40 1.5M (no help/inheritance/or family money)
Anonymous wrote:40 & 42. Net worth about 1.35. And I thought that was good. Ya'll are killin' it out here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here. I wouldn't count pensions. I'm not counting Social Security.
My breakdown is: retirement accounts 3.4 million, brokerage/checking/savings accounts $1.6 million, home equity $750k.
I quit working 5 years ago. Had worked in BigLaw.
Are others with healthy net worth continuing to work? If so, why?
Health insurance and trying to instill a work ethic in my kids who will likely inherit a lot of money one day, thanks to wealthy ILs.
Meh. With a high net worth you don’t need employer health insurance. You can just buy your own.
I'm a high net worth person and quit working. I've posted on here before, however, that health insurance is very expensive. I'm not complaining but just stating the facts. It increases again next month to about $5100 a MONTH for a family of four. Yes, we can "just buy our own" but that is quite a bit of "change."
Where do you live? I just did a search on the DC Health Exchange and the MOST expensive top of the line plan that they offer for a family of four doesn't even cost half that.
Northern va. In all of va there is a single plan that’s a ppo that’s available for an individual. For that you can have gold or silver - we do the “cheaper” silver one. We could do an hmo but want a ppo.
Even with your net worth, paying $60,000 a year for health insurance would drive me to getting an additional cash stream, preferrably from a job with health insurance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:36, negative maybe 700K because of a mortgage. If you take that out it's positive 500K, but that's no how I think of things.
The mortgage is not a liability unless the house is worth no money. To include mortgage you would add the value of your home to your NW and then subtract the mortgage balance