Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
On this planet, where we face global warming, due in large part to auto emissions created by long commutes - where it certainly makes sense to add more density in places served by transit, that are walkable and bikeable, and where even auto commutes are going to be short.
And in this case where it can be done without creating gentrification, since these are not poor neighborhoods.
I'd prefer to just get rid of cattle farming. There are lots of places to tackle global warming before covering low density neighborhoods with concrete.
--mostly vegetarian
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s not a news source. It’s a pretty well-documented PR outlet for developers.
Really?
Post links to 5 articles in the last month that were pro developer.
Ha! More like post 5 articles in the past 5 days that are pro-developer.
Let's see them then.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
Georgetown is already a lot denser than those neighborhoods.
Georgetown has lots of deep lots and gardens. Not every neighborhood has to be built dense. What’s wrong with diversity ?
I dont understand either, but according to the mayors unveiling of her ward 3 density plan, single family homes represent white greed and are the source of housing issues in the district.
And what about her favorite developers -- is that "green greed"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
On this planet, where we face global warming, due in large part to auto emissions created by long commutes - where it certainly makes sense to add more density in places served by transit, that are walkable and bikeable, and where even auto commutes are going to be short.
And in this case where it can be done without creating gentrification, since these are not poor neighborhoods.
Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
Georgetown is already a lot denser than those neighborhoods.
Georgetown has lots of deep lots and gardens. Not every neighborhood has to be built dense. What’s wrong with diversity ?
I dont understand either, but according to the mayors unveiling of her ward 3 density plan, single family homes represent white greed and are the source of housing issues in the district.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I vote for less density. Fewer condos, more green space.
And more wider highways?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
Georgetown is already a lot denser than those neighborhoods.
Georgetown has lots of deep lots and gardens. Not every neighborhood has to be built dense. What’s wrong with diversity ?
I dont understand either, but according to the mayors unveiling of her ward 3 density plan, single family homes represent white greed and are the source of housing issues in the district.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
Georgetown is already a lot denser than those neighborhoods.
Georgetown has lots of deep lots and gardens. Not every neighborhood has to be built dense. What’s wrong with diversity ?
Anonymous wrote:I vote for less density. Fewer condos, more green space.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On what planet does it make sense to “densify” the residential side streets of neighborhoods like Forest Hills, AU Park, Chevy Chase DC, Spring Valley that we’re planned as leafy suburban streets with set-backs and pedestrian scale (or Cleveland Park, for that matter, which was both planned as a street car suburb and is a historic district on the National Register)? Is densification also planned for Georgetown?
Georgetown is already a lot denser than those neighborhoods.
Anonymous wrote:Should we all fight for our neighborhoods to be historically zoned? What's the process? I certainly think all the turn ot the century through 1950s single family home neighborhoods in DC have historical merit and charm.