Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Read the previous post. A Quaker school exists to educate Quaker children. That's not Sidwell.
Sidwell under the leadership of the current head exists to educate wealthy or well-connected liberals with a few token normal people thrown in. Quakerism is about simplicity, humility, seeing God in everyone.
Sidwell has wandered far from its original mission.
Because there are so many Quakers still around.
Exactly. Most folks don’t even realize there was a Quaker religion.
Then Sidwell should drop the pretension. But then they would lose their tax status. Hmmm...
First, they are not going to "drop" being a Quaker school. And even if they did, they could still be a non-profit, or is GDS not tax-exempt?
Why keep pretending though?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Read the previous post. A Quaker school exists to educate Quaker children. That's not Sidwell.
Sidwell under the leadership of the current head exists to educate wealthy or well-connected liberals with a few token normal people thrown in. Quakerism is about simplicity, humility, seeing God in everyone.
Sidwell has wandered far from its original mission.
Because there are so many Quakers still around.
Exactly. Most folks don’t even realize there was a Quaker religion.
Then Sidwell should drop the pretension. But then they would lose their tax status. Hmmm...
First, they are not going to "drop" being a Quaker school. And even if they did, they could still be a non-profit, or is GDS not tax-exempt?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Read the previous post. A Quaker school exists to educate Quaker children. That's not Sidwell.
Sidwell under the leadership of the current head exists to educate wealthy or well-connected liberals with a few token normal people thrown in. Quakerism is about simplicity, humility, seeing God in everyone.
Sidwell has wandered far from its original mission.
Because there are so many Quakers still around.
Exactly. Most folks don’t even realize there was a Quaker religion.
Then Sidwell should drop the pretension. But then they would lose their tax status. Hmmm...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Read the previous post. A Quaker school exists to educate Quaker children. That's not Sidwell.
Sidwell under the leadership of the current head exists to educate wealthy or well-connected liberals with a few token normal people thrown in. Quakerism is about simplicity, humility, seeing God in everyone.
Sidwell has wandered far from its original mission.
Because there are so many Quakers still around.
Exactly. Most folks don’t even realize there was a Quaker religion.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Read the previous post. A Quaker school exists to educate Quaker children. That's not Sidwell.
Sidwell under the leadership of the current head exists to educate wealthy or well-connected liberals with a few token normal people thrown in. Quakerism is about simplicity, humility, seeing God in everyone.
Sidwell has wandered far from its original mission.
Because there are so many Quakers still around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Read the previous post. A Quaker school exists to educate Quaker children. That's not Sidwell.
Sidwell under the leadership of the current head exists to educate wealthy or well-connected liberals with a few token normal people thrown in. Quakerism is about simplicity, humility, seeing God in everyone.
Sidwell has wandered far from its original mission.

Anonymous wrote:How is Sidwell not a Quaker school? Really?
Anonymous wrote:Is the Sidwell pedophile still there?
Anonymous wrote:Quaker schools exist to educate Quaker children in the Quaker faith.
Anonymous wrote:Sidwell follows the rules PP. that’s why they haven’t had the greatest talent come. Those who do decide that are D1 athletes come for the education, make no mistake.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Completely naïve.
I'm not PP, but why do rules exist if they're going to be mocked and not enforced?