Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^^^ are the Republicans opposed to those things? Because they have offered lots of yapping and drafted zero legislation. Why is this the Democrat’s responsibility?

And it should be bipartisan. And it was before Trump. But in 2019, Rs would hate the bill Dems would write with a pathway to citizenship for people who have been here for years and assimilated with no criminal record, and DACA, and mandatory e-verify, and 21st century border protection, and no frigging wall and reigning in the deplorable behavior of CBP, and stopping family separations. . Do you really think this bill would ever make it to the Senate floor?

Um..... Trump offered a DACA fix early in his presidency. Dems didn't want it because they don't want a permanent fix - a wall.
And, personally, I am opposed to the parents of the DACA kids getting a path to citizenship. Perhaps they can stay, but no path to citizenship. They broke our laws. Why reward them?

And, like it or not, CBP is doing their job.
And, family separations are necessary to determine whether they are family units. A third of them are not.

Anonymous wrote:Jesus is going to come back as a Guatemalan asylum seeker and all you “help Americans first but not too much because that’s socialist” types are going to be in trouble.

Anonymous wrote:^^^ are the Republicans opposed to those things? Because they have offered lots of yapping and drafted zero legislation. Why is this the Democrat’s responsibility?

And it should be bipartisan. And it was before Trump. But in 2019, Rs would hate the bill Dems would write with a pathway to citizenship for people who have been here for years and assimilated with no criminal record, and DACA, and mandatory e-verify, and 21st century border protection, and no frigging wall and reigning in the deplorable behavior of CBP, and stopping family separations. . Do you really think this bill would ever make it to the Senate floor?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Just stop.
The Democrats could change the situation in an instant - by changing the laws that encourage these people to come. But, they won't. Because, Trump.
They will not allow the Republicans to introduce legislation to change the laws. Because, Trump.
And, if the Democrats had their way - these people would all be released into the country. That is their ultimate goal. They are secretly happy that the holding facilities are overcrowded and understaffed because they can complain and scream about the conditions. And, those that scream the loudest voted AGAINST additional funding to improve the situation. Explain that.

And, just stop with the "cages." These "cages" were the ones installed by the Obama administration.

the democrats can change the law unilaterally? how interesting. someone must have missed "school house rocks."

Oh, please. Nancy won't introduce any legislation to improve the situation. You know it. I know it.
She won't pass anything that might give Trump a win. Without the Dems voting on these in the House, it won't happen.

What legislation do you propose she introduces?

The Bill the Trump Admin wrote? Oh wait...
The Bill the Senate passed? Oh, hmmmm....

Or do you think the Democrats are going to write a bill and pass it in the House and Mitch will hop to and make sure it passes the Senate and Trump doesn’t veto it.

You live in lala land lady.

Referring you to my post at 17:37. You're welcome.
And, if the House actually passed something that would help and not just virtue signal, I am sure it would clear the Senate as well. But they won't. Because, Trump.

So you think it’s the job of the Democratic controlled House to write and pass a Bill That reflects republican immigration priorities? As opposed to, say, the Republican controlled Senate writing and passing said will or the Republican POTUS working with congressional Rs?

Are the Republicans really so incompetent they can’t write their own damn bill and introduce it in the Senate?

Lady, whatever you are smoking must be awfully strong.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Just stop.
The Democrats could change the situation in an instant - by changing the laws that encourage these people to come. But, they won't. Because, Trump.
They will not allow the Republicans to introduce legislation to change the laws. Because, Trump.
And, if the Democrats had their way - these people would all be released into the country. That is their ultimate goal. They are secretly happy that the holding facilities are overcrowded and understaffed because they can complain and scream about the conditions. And, those that scream the loudest voted AGAINST additional funding to improve the situation. Explain that.

And, just stop with the "cages." These "cages" were the ones installed by the Obama administration.

the democrats can change the law unilaterally? how interesting. someone must have missed "school house rocks."

Oh, please. Nancy won't introduce any legislation to improve the situation. You know it. I know it.
She won't pass anything that might give Trump a win. Without the Dems voting on these in the House, it won't happen.

What legislation do you propose she introduces?

The Bill the Trump Admin wrote? Oh wait...
The Bill the Senate passed? Oh, hmmmm....

Or do you think the Democrats are going to write a bill and pass it in the House and Mitch will hop to and make sure it passes the Senate and Trump doesn’t veto it.

You live in lala land lady.

Referring you to my post at 17:37. You're welcome.
And, if the House actually passed something that would help and not just virtue signal, I am sure it would clear the Senate as well. But they won't. Because, Trump.

Anonymous wrote:So, how about them huge ICE raids? It’s being reported that ICE arrested no more people today then they normally do.

What a Nothingnurger.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Exactly.

The left pretends to be Christian and it’s fake as f-k.

Because they believe living breathing children deserve at least as much protection as 8 celled embryos?

Wait -- are you in favor of murdering living breathing children too?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Exactly.

The left pretends to be Christian and it’s fake as f-k.

Because they believe living breathing children deserve at least as much protection as 8 celled embryos?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Just stop.
The Democrats could change the situation in an instant - by changing the laws that encourage these people to come. But, they won't. Because, Trump.
They will not allow the Republicans to introduce legislation to change the laws. Because, Trump.
And, if the Democrats had their way - these people would all be released into the country. That is their ultimate goal. They are secretly happy that the holding facilities are overcrowded and understaffed because they can complain and scream about the conditions. And, those that scream the loudest voted AGAINST additional funding to improve the situation. Explain that.

And, just stop with the "cages." These "cages" were the ones installed by the Obama administration.

the democrats can change the law unilaterally? how interesting. someone must have missed "school house rocks."

Oh, please. Nancy won't introduce any legislation to improve the situation. You know it. I know it.
She won't pass anything that might give Trump a win. Without the Dems voting on these in the House, it won't happen.

What legislation do you propose she introduces?

The Bill the Trump Admin wrote? Oh wait...
The Bill the Senate passed? Oh, hmmmm....

Or do you think the Democrats are going to write a bill and pass it in the House and Mitch will hop to and make sure it passes the Senate and Trump doesn’t veto it.

You live in lala land lady.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Just stop.
The Democrats could change the situation in an instant - by changing the laws that encourage these people to come. But, they won't. Because, Trump.
They will not allow the Republicans to introduce legislation to change the laws. Because, Trump.
And, if the Democrats had their way - these people would all be released into the country. That is their ultimate goal. They are secretly happy that the holding facilities are overcrowded and understaffed because they can complain and scream about the conditions. And, those that scream the loudest voted AGAINST additional funding to improve the situation. Explain that.

And, just stop with the "cages." These "cages" were the ones installed by the Obama administration.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I sure miss the days when conservatives pretended to be compassionate.

We REALLY miss the days when liberals believed in supporting our immigration laws.
And, that wasn't too long ago.
I could post clip after clip of video of Obama, Schumer, and even HRC discussing how our borders must be enforced and our border policies must be adhered to.

Guess this is an attempt by the Democrats to import more future voters since they can't seem to get them the legal way.

And, BTW - we are compassionate. And, we also believe in the rule of law.
As long as these people enter illegally and stay when they have been ordered to leave, we are less able to support more immigrants who choose to come the legal way and abide by our laws.

You are full of sh*t. Was Mike Pence compassionate as he crossed his arms and refused to acknowledge the men in cages at the border? Waere Lindsey Graham or Mike Lee? Is separating kids from their parents— and then losing the parents— compassionate? How about jamming kids in cages meant to hold 1/3 of occupants. With no showers or cots. 24 hour light and sleep if you can on the concrete floor. Conditions we don’t impose of murderers in the Us criminal justice system. Is making young teens taking care of sick babies who don’t get clean diapers compassionate? Telling women to drink out of the toilet? Do compassionate people stand up in Court and argue that safe and sanitary conditions for children do not include soap and a toothbrush? Do compassionate federal government officials run secret FB groups making fun of dead migrant toddlers.

You don’t seem to get it. Liberals are not upset that immigration laws are being enforced. They are upset that they are being enforced in the cruelest, most inhumane and most dangerous manner imaginable. That this Administration literally looked at their immigration procedures and said— deporting and enforcing the law isn’t enough. What can we do to make human beings suffer to the greatest extent possible? That this administration is going out of its way to house children in unsafe, unclean and dangerous conditions to punish their parents.

You can enforce the law without unnecessary and gratuitous cruelty. But then what would Stephen Miller have to jerk off to?

I never thought I would see the rise of the Christian Left. But, here we are.

Just stop.
The Democrats could change the situation in an instant - by changing the laws that encourage these people to come. But, they won't. Because, Trump.
They will not allow the Republicans to introduce legislation to change the laws. Because, Trump.
And, if the Democrats had their way - these people would all be released into the country. That is their ultimate goal. They are secretly happy that the holding facilities are overcrowded and understaffed because they can complain and scream about the conditions. And, those that scream the loudest voted AGAINST additional funding to improve the situation. Explain that.

And, just stop with the "cages." These "cages" were the ones installed by the Obama administration.

the democrats can change the law unilaterally? how interesting. someone must have missed "school house rocks."

Oh, please. Nancy won't introduce any legislation to improve the situation. You know it. I know it.
She won't pass anything that might give Trump a win. Without the Dems voting on these in the House, it won't happen.