Anonymous wrote:Actually, it does.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
I know it's an old thread, and probably everyone else jumped on this, but this is an absurd post. Any complicated case is going to end up in the hospital. It very well could be true that the raw numbers look better for home births, but that doesn't mean it's safer.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obviously this woman is horrid. But who the hell doesn't do any kind of background check on someone?!?
The same people who prefer to give birth on their living room floor rather than the hospital with actual doctors and a NICU?
The reality is that medical emergencies can happen even if you have a licensed midwife. Babies should be delivered by a proper medical team with access to emergency medical services for both mom and baby.
Actually, it does.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
I know it's an old thread, and probably everyone else jumped on this, but this is an absurd post. Any complicated case is going to end up in the hospital. It very well could be true that the raw numbers look better for home births, but that doesn't mean it's safer.
Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone who pays $4k for an unlicensed midwife has more money than brains.
Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Let's post some articles on how many women and babies have died because they went to a hospital instead of staying home. I guarantee the number far exceeds the number mentioned in this article. Home births are always safer. Fact. Of course there are a few outliers for whom a hospital birth is necessary, but they're truly outliers. Most home births are safe and most are much safer than being in a germy money making hospital with dozens of hands in the pot, none knowing what the other is doing. Women, especially black women, die in hospitals every day. The United States has the WORST infant mortality rate of ANY developed nation, and we also have the highest rate of hospital births.
Also, it says she wasn't licensed IN THAT STATE, not that she had no training and wasn't licensed at all anywhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a huge diff between a qualified and non-qualified home birth provider. This woman had 50 births and seems to be pro no intervention including prenatal care AND took a breech birth at home. That's what's irresponsible, not the idea of home birth, period.
Yup. This. Home with a qualified midwife, someone who has completed a program at SUNY or similiar is just as safe as with an OB ina hospital. The US would be wise to push for training more qualified midwives and making use of them the way the rest of the world does.
actually a big study just found that the type of attendant does not matter - home birth is riskier no matter what. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-homebirths-newborn-mortality-idUSKBN20N0R0
NP here. The important piece of the findings was in the last two paragraphs. Learn to examine things beyond the headlines.
the last two paragraphs where they find homebirth is dangerous no matter what kind of midwife?
The important piece of the article is :
"The discrepancy between survival rates for home and hospital births in the U.S. is not seen in developed nations like England, the Netherlands, Germany and Australia.
These countries tend to screen expectant mothers for risk factors like age or obesity that might endanger their newborns if they opt for a home birth, the authors note in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology."
But it's not a sensational headline. We don't do birth the right way in this country, but instead of fixing that we'd rather have Ob vs midwife wars. Home birth vs Hospital birth wars.
We’re not in Europe. So I don’t see what your point is. Here, home birth is demostrably more dangerous because midwives don’t screen patients, in part. (Netherlands also found a disparity based on income btw).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There's a huge diff between a qualified and non-qualified home birth provider. This woman had 50 births and seems to be pro no intervention including prenatal care AND took a breech birth at home. That's what's irresponsible, not the idea of home birth, period.
Yup. This. Home with a qualified midwife, someone who has completed a program at SUNY or similiar is just as safe as with an OB ina hospital. The US would be wise to push for training more qualified midwives and making use of them the way the rest of the world does.
actually a big study just found that the type of attendant does not matter - home birth is riskier no matter what. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-homebirths-newborn-mortality-idUSKBN20N0R0
NP here. The important piece of the findings was in the last two paragraphs. Learn to examine things beyond the headlines.
the last two paragraphs where they find homebirth is dangerous no matter what kind of midwife?
The important piece of the article is :
"The discrepancy between survival rates for home and hospital births in the U.S. is not seen in developed nations like England, the Netherlands, Germany and Australia.
These countries tend to screen expectant mothers for risk factors like age or obesity that might endanger their newborns if they opt for a home birth, the authors note in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology."
But it's not a sensational headline. We don't do birth the right way in this country, but instead of fixing that we'd rather have Ob vs midwife wars. Home birth vs Hospital birth wars.