Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, here. Thanks to all who commented. DS is sure he wants to attend a small, alternative college. We figured this list is a good place to start in terms of the types of schools he’s considering.
Good luck, OP. This is exactly why the CTCL list can be helpful. There are thousands of colleges in the country and for someone who wants a smaller, alternative school it can be daunting to research them all.
What's his area of interest, broadly? Arty? Interested in science? Sports?
He has zero interest in sports. (As a spectator or participant.) He isn’t sure what he wants to do in college—he’s actually both arty and science-y. He’s even found a way to combine them to some degree. Still, he isn’t sure if he wants to focus on any of that. He’s also very good at and enjoys foreign languages. We tease that he’s a true Renaissance kid. This is completely different from his sister, who is laser-focused. She knew exactly what she wanted to study. For her, we were able to research and zero in on schools that have good physics programs and faculty (as well as good football teams).
It’s all a process. Thanks again for the input! It’s much appreciated.
He should consider looking into Kalamazoo College. We visited a lot of the midwestern SLACs and that one struck me as having a lot of "Renaissance kids"- and good supports for STEM and arts. And a large majority of students do at least 1 semester study abroad -- maybe 85%?
One reason why so many students at small liberal arts colleges study abroad is because they get stifled in their small school and small town environment and need a break. This isn't unique to CTCL schools -- it happens at smaller schools generally.
Kalamazoo is a bit different here--it's located in a city with another large college. But they have a funding mechanism where study abroad --including travel and living expenses--cost the same as a semester on campus and they set up majors to accommodate it -- so many students participate.
At many privates it’s actually cheaper to study abroad than to stay on campus. Kalamazoo’s program may be special, but the cost isn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
Correlation, not causality. You should’ve studied harder.
Seriously. PP needs to post where she went to school so we know not to send our kids there!
Please explain why it's so terrible to suggest that students who study at small and isolated colleges might be more inclined to take a break and study abroad than students at larger schools.
Suggesting that it MIGHT be one reason is one thing. Stating it definitively like she did is quite another.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
Correlation, not causality. You should’ve studied harder.
Seriously. PP needs to post where she went to school so we know not to send our kids there!
Please explain why it's so terrible to suggest that students who study at small and isolated colleges might be more inclined to take a break and study abroad than students at larger schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
Correlation, not causality. You should’ve studied harder.
Seriously. PP needs to post where she went to school so we know not to send our kids there!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
Correlation, not causality. You should’ve studied harder.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
Correlation, not causality. You should’ve studied harder.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, here. Thanks to all who commented. DS is sure he wants to attend a small, alternative college. We figured this list is a good place to start in terms of the types of schools he’s considering.
Good luck, OP. This is exactly why the CTCL list can be helpful. There are thousands of colleges in the country and for someone who wants a smaller, alternative school it can be daunting to research them all.
What's his area of interest, broadly? Arty? Interested in science? Sports?
He has zero interest in sports. (As a spectator or participant.) He isn’t sure what he wants to do in college—he’s actually both arty and science-y. He’s even found a way to combine them to some degree. Still, he isn’t sure if he wants to focus on any of that. He’s also very good at and enjoys foreign languages. We tease that he’s a true Renaissance kid. This is completely different from his sister, who is laser-focused. She knew exactly what she wanted to study. For her, we were able to research and zero in on schools that have good physics programs and faculty (as well as good football teams).
It’s all a process. Thanks again for the input! It’s much appreciated.
He should consider looking into Kalamazoo College. We visited a lot of the midwestern SLACs and that one struck me as having a lot of "Renaissance kids"- and good supports for STEM and arts. And a large majority of students do at least 1 semester study abroad -- maybe 85%?
One reason why so many students at small liberal arts colleges study abroad is because they get stifled in their small school and small town environment and need a break. This isn't unique to CTCL schools -- it happens at smaller schools generally.
Kalamazoo is a bit different here--it's located in a city with another large college. But they have a funding mechanism where study abroad --including travel and living expenses--cost the same as a semester on campus and they set up majors to accommodate it -- so many students participate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, here. Thanks to all who commented. DS is sure he wants to attend a small, alternative college. We figured this list is a good place to start in terms of the types of schools he’s considering.
Good luck, OP. This is exactly why the CTCL list can be helpful. There are thousands of colleges in the country and for someone who wants a smaller, alternative school it can be daunting to research them all.
What's his area of interest, broadly? Arty? Interested in science? Sports?
He has zero interest in sports. (As a spectator or participant.) He isn’t sure what he wants to do in college—he’s actually both arty and science-y. He’s even found a way to combine them to some degree. Still, he isn’t sure if he wants to focus on any of that. He’s also very good at and enjoys foreign languages. We tease that he’s a true Renaissance kid. This is completely different from his sister, who is laser-focused. She knew exactly what she wanted to study. For her, we were able to research and zero in on schools that have good physics programs and faculty (as well as good football teams).
It’s all a process. Thanks again for the input! It’s much appreciated.
He should consider looking into Kalamazoo College. We visited a lot of the midwestern SLACs and that one struck me as having a lot of "Renaissance kids"- and good supports for STEM and arts. And a large majority of students do at least 1 semester study abroad -- maybe 85%?
One reason why so many students at small liberal arts colleges study abroad is because they get stifled in their small school and small town environment and need a break. This isn't unique to CTCL schools -- it happens at smaller schools generally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking forward to you not supporting that study abroad proclamation.
Here's one of many links to websites showing that more students study abroad from smaller schools than bigger ones. https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/most-study-abroad
Many small schools go out of their way to tout studying abroad on their websites because they know that applicants worry (with good reason) about the claustrophobia of having to spend four years in a small environment in the middle of nowhere. It's kind of ironic -- I mean, if the education and social experience provided by these schools is so awesome and special, then why do you need to get away? -- but it makes sense.
I studied abroad, btw, and so did all of my kids (all of whom attended top-ranked schools, big and small). I recognize the inherent value of studying abroad, obviously. I'm just saying that the reason why it's more prevalent in smaller schools is obvious.
I’m glad you can divine each person’s motivation to study in a foreign country. I’m certain in every situation it must be because they feel stifled in their horrible college situation. What else could cause them to flee the country?! It probably has nothing to do with cool STEM opportunities or anything dumb like that.