Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Parent of the boy who threw it.
No. The stupid mother who put her phone down at kiddie pool.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I once placed my phone in between a folded up pool towel next to the ledge of the pool. I had been taking pics of kids. A pool attendant was tidying up and grabbed the towel and my phone fell out and I watched as it narrowly missed tumbling into the pool. The attendant apologized profusely and I stopped her. I said it was my fault. Why would I think that was a good place?
Accidents happen. A toddler throwing a phone into a pool is an accident. No one to blame, everyone to blame.
No, that is a deliberate action from someone who doesn't understand the consequences. Not understanding the consequences does not mean there aren't any.
Yup, the consequence is the adult needs to buy a new phone. Hopefully, the adult also learns to better care for their belongings instead of expecting toddlers to do it for them.
It’s the height of entitlement to expect toddlers to be more responsible than adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I once placed my phone in between a folded up pool towel next to the ledge of the pool. I had been taking pics of kids. A pool attendant was tidying up and grabbed the towel and my phone fell out and I watched as it narrowly missed tumbling into the pool. The attendant apologized profusely and I stopped her. I said it was my fault. Why would I think that was a good place?
Accidents happen. A toddler throwing a phone into a pool is an accident. No one to blame, everyone to blame.
No, that is a deliberate action from someone who doesn't understand the consequences. Not understanding the consequences does not mean there aren't any.
Yup, the consequence is the adult needs to buy a new phone. Hopefully, the adult also learns to better care for their belongings instead of expecting toddlers to do it for them.
It’s the height of entitlement to expect toddlers to be more responsible than adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I once placed my phone in between a folded up pool towel next to the ledge of the pool. I had been taking pics of kids. A pool attendant was tidying up and grabbed the towel and my phone fell out and I watched as it narrowly missed tumbling into the pool. The attendant apologized profusely and I stopped her. I said it was my fault. Why would I think that was a good place?
Accidents happen. A toddler throwing a phone into a pool is an accident. No one to blame, everyone to blame.
No, that is a deliberate action from someone who doesn't understand the consequences. Not understanding the consequences does not mean there aren't any.
Yup, the consequence is the adult needs to buy a new phone. Hopefully, the adult also learns to better care for their belongings instead of expecting toddlers to do it for them.
It’s the height of entitlement to expect toddlers to be more responsible than adults.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I once placed my phone in between a folded up pool towel next to the ledge of the pool. I had been taking pics of kids. A pool attendant was tidying up and grabbed the towel and my phone fell out and I watched as it narrowly missed tumbling into the pool. The attendant apologized profusely and I stopped her. I said it was my fault. Why would I think that was a good place?
Accidents happen. A toddler throwing a phone into a pool is an accident. No one to blame, everyone to blame.
No, that is a deliberate action from someone who doesn't understand the consequences. Not understanding the consequences does not mean there aren't any.
Anonymous wrote:I once placed my phone in between a folded up pool towel next to the ledge of the pool. I had been taking pics of kids. A pool attendant was tidying up and grabbed the towel and my phone fell out and I watched as it narrowly missed tumbling into the pool. The attendant apologized profusely and I stopped her. I said it was my fault. Why would I think that was a good place?
Accidents happen. A toddler throwing a phone into a pool is an accident. No one to blame, everyone to blame.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the people who say it's all the phone owner's fault - at what point do you take responsibility for your child's actions? Like if your child took a pen and drew on someone's couch - would you offer to have it cleaned? Or was it the couch owner's fault for having pens in the house? What if your child dumped their entire cup of milk into the purse of someone at the table next to you? Was is their fault for leaving the purse near your child? What if the purse was hanging from the back of their chair? Should they have gotten a separate chair for their bag or left it in their car? I agree that the mom was stupid for leaving her phone near the pool's edge, where it could have just as easily been heavily splashed as thrown in, but I also don't understand how the parents of the toddler would not have offered to pay for it. If it turns out it was a limited edition Louis Vuitton iPhone 32X that cost $10,000 I would have to explain that I can't afford to replace that but I would offer something as compensation. I also do think they should graciously decline my offer, but I would nonetheless pay something. I'm just curious for all the people who say a two-year old can't be responsible for their actions, in which case it was an accident, do you not think you should ever have to take responsibility for what your child does even if they didn't do it on purpose?
These situations are vastly different.
Anonymous wrote:To the people who say it's all the phone owner's fault - at what point do you take responsibility for your child's actions? Like if your child took a pen and drew on someone's couch - would you offer to have it cleaned? Or was it the couch owner's fault for having pens in the house? What if your child dumped their entire cup of milk into the purse of someone at the table next to you? Was is their fault for leaving the purse near your child? What if the purse was hanging from the back of their chair? Should they have gotten a separate chair for their bag or left it in their car? I agree that the mom was stupid for leaving her phone near the pool's edge, where it could have just as easily been heavily splashed as thrown in, but I also don't understand how the parents of the toddler would not have offered to pay for it. If it turns out it was a limited edition Louis Vuitton iPhone 32X that cost $10,000 I would have to explain that I can't afford to replace that but I would offer something as compensation. I also do think they should graciously decline my offer, but I would nonetheless pay something. I'm just curious for all the people who say a two-year old can't be responsible for their actions, in which case it was an accident, do you not think you should ever have to take responsibility for what your child does even if they didn't do it on purpose?
Anonymous wrote:A child under 7 should have the caretakers undivided attention and be in arms reach at all time. Constant active supervision is required at all times. Are there not signs posted all around the pool area stating such? That the phone got broken, indicates that Mom failed to follow pool policy. Often on the pool signage it will indicated they may be suspended from or refused entry into the facility for failure to comply with policy.
Anonymous wrote:To the people who say it's all the phone owner's fault - at what point do you take responsibility for your child's actions? Like if your child took a pen and drew on someone's couch - would you offer to have it cleaned? Or was it the couch owner's fault for having pens in the house? What if your child dumped their entire cup of milk into the purse of someone at the table next to you? Was is their fault for leaving the purse near your child? What if the purse was hanging from the back of their chair? Should they have gotten a separate chair for their bag or left it in their car? I agree that the mom was stupid for leaving her phone near the pool's edge, where it could have just as easily been heavily splashed as thrown in, but I also don't understand how the parents of the toddler would not have offered to pay for it. If it turns out it was a limited edition Louis Vuitton iPhone 32X that cost $10,000 I would have to explain that I can't afford to replace that but I would offer something as compensation. I also do think they should graciously decline my offer, but I would nonetheless pay something. I'm just curious for all the people who say a two-year old can't be responsible for their actions, in which case it was an accident, do you not think you should ever have to take responsibility for what your child does even if they didn't do it on purpose?
Anonymous wrote:The boy who threw it. If it had been my son I would have offered to pay for a new phone (assuming they didn't have insurance or anything on it). However, if I were the mom with the phone I would have refused an offer for someone to pay for it.
Anonymous wrote:To the people who say it's all the phone owner's fault - at what point do you take responsibility for your child's actions? Like if your child took a pen and drew on someone's couch - would you offer to have it cleaned? Or was it the couch owner's fault for having pens in the house? What if your child dumped their entire cup of milk into the purse of someone at the table next to you? Was is their fault for leaving the purse near your child? What if the purse was hanging from the back of their chair? Should they have gotten a separate chair for their bag or left it in their car? I agree that the mom was stupid for leaving her phone near the pool's edge, where it could have just as easily been heavily splashed as thrown in, but I also don't understand how the parents of the toddler would not have offered to pay for it. If it turns out it was a limited edition Louis Vuitton iPhone 32X that cost $10,000 I would have to explain that I can't afford to replace that but I would offer something as compensation. I also do think they should graciously decline my offer, but I would nonetheless pay something. I'm just curious for all the people who say a two-year old can't be responsible for their actions, in which case it was an accident, do you not think you should ever have to take responsibility for what your child does even if they didn't do it on purpose?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A child under 7 should have the caretakers undivided attention and be in arms reach at all time. Constant active supervision is required at all times. Are there not signs posted all around the pool area stating such? That the phone got broken, indicates that Mom failed to follow pool policy. Often on the pool signage it will indicated they may be suspended from or refused entry into the facility for failure to comply with policy.
I have to think that some of these replies are from people who don't have little kids, or haven't for a long time. I supervise my kid 24/7 but it is literally impossible to control every movement she makes. My 3 year old could easily knock a phone in the pool in under 3 seconds if it was close enough, before I could even register what was happening.
I still think the parent of the kid should offer to pay (and discipline their kid), but I think it's preposterous to suggest that a parent could definitely have prevented this if they were just watching more closely.
+1 Especially the person who thinks any child under 7 should be within arm's reach. That person can not possibly have children.