Anonymous
04/27/2019 10:09
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
Thank you for this info.
Why doesn’t HU put a policy in place to control the situation? Close the campus? Ban dogs?
Because it’s not so much about the dogs. It’s more about the pigment of the changing neighborhood.
Yup.
It's obvious.
Anonymous
04/27/2019 10:05
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
Thank you for this info.
Why doesn’t HU put a policy in place to control the situation? Close the campus? Ban dogs?
Because it’s not so much about the dogs. It’s more about the pigment of the changing neighborhood.
Anonymous
04/27/2019 09:35
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
How much you wanna bet that if black folks were routinely wandering around George Washington University taking their dogs for doo-doo walks either the campus police or MPDC would be locking em up en masse without hesitation? GW’s campus policy be damned they’d see it as disrespectful and probably shoot a few folks because a black person with so much as a toy poodle would be perceived as a threat.
As a white person who absolutely hates entitled dog owners (which, let's face it, is 99% of them), I honestly think the biggest issue is that it's hard to do something about people walking their dogs in places rather than this having anything to do with white people being untouchable.
It's also clear to me that people who take their dogs into public areas are a special breed of entitled and I really, really hope people of color don't lump them into "white people" category because many if not most white people are annoyed by them too.
DP So, according to you I'm not allowed to walk my dog in downtown Silver Spring because it is a public area? Are you for real? Where do you think we are going to go? Not everyone has a huge backyard. What part of public property don't you understand?
Ignore the crazies.
Anonymous
04/27/2019 07:22
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
Thank you for this info.
Why doesn’t HU put a policy in place to control the situation? Close the campus? Ban dogs?
Anonymous
04/27/2019 00:45
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:The word racist is thrown around so much it essentially has no meaning now.
No it has meaning, its just people on here want to change the meaning to suit their own purposes.
Anonymous
04/27/2019 00:02
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
The word racist is thrown around so much it essentially has no meaning now.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 21:10
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Can we take a second to talk about the ridiculousness of the "reverse discrimination" posters who take such great delight in calling black people racist on DCUM? While I, personally, do not think some of the rhetoric about white people is useful, I think it's kind of funny how the reverse discrimination folks fling around "racist" to label black behavior as if it's some kind of devastating critique. All they do when they call black people "racist" is reflect that they believe that the label of racism is some kind of intolerably unfair put-down that's always bogus. It just mirrors back their own insecurity at being called racist.
Whose taking delight in it? NO one.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 21:01
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
How much you wanna bet that if black folks were routinely wandering around George Washington University taking their dogs for doo-doo walks either the campus police or MPDC would be locking em up en masse without hesitation? GW’s campus policy be damned they’d see it as disrespectful and probably shoot a few folks because a black person with so much as a toy poodle would be perceived as a threat.
As a white person who absolutely hates entitled dog owners (which, let's face it, is 99% of them), I honestly think the biggest issue is that it's hard to do something about people walking their dogs in places rather than this having anything to do with white people being untouchable.
It's also clear to me that people who take their dogs into public areas are a special breed of entitled and I really, really hope people of color don't lump them into "white people" category because many if not most white people are annoyed by them too.
DP So, according to you I'm not allowed to walk my dog in downtown Silver Spring because it is a public area? Are you for real? Where do you think we are going to go? Not everyone has a huge backyard. What part of public property don't you understand?
Anonymous
04/26/2019 20:32
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
Case closed.
Drop the racist bs.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 19:43
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Can we take a second to talk about the ridiculousness of the "reverse discrimination" posters who take such great delight in calling black people racist on DCUM? While I, personally, do not think some of the rhetoric about white people is useful, I think it's kind of funny how the reverse discrimination folks fling around "racist" to label black behavior as if it's some kind of devastating critique. All they do when they call black people "racist" is reflect that they believe that the label of racism is some kind of intolerably unfair put-down that's always bogus. It just mirrors back their own insecurity at being called racist.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 19:35
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
How much you wanna bet that if black folks were routinely wandering around George Washington University taking their dogs for doo-doo walks either the campus police or MPDC would be locking em up en masse without hesitation? GW’s campus policy be damned they’d see it as disrespectful and probably shoot a few folks because a black person with so much as a toy poodle would be perceived as a threat.
As a white person who absolutely hates entitled dog owners (which, let's face it, is 99% of them), I honestly think the biggest issue is that it's hard to do something about people walking their dogs in places rather than this having anything to do with white people being untouchable.
It's also clear to me that people who take their dogs into public areas are a special breed of entitled and I really, really hope people of color don't lump them into "white people" category because many if not most white people are annoyed by them too.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 19:31
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
How much you wanna bet that if black folks were routinely wandering around George Washington University taking their dogs for doo-doo walks either the campus police or MPDC would be locking em up en masse without hesitation? GW’s campus policy be damned they’d see it as disrespectful and probably shoot a few folks because a black person with so much as a toy poodle would be perceived as a threat.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 18:40
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?
Alonda Thomas, a Howard University spokesperson, says there is no policy prohibiting dogs. Howard’s campus is open, meaning anyone is allowed to walk through it.
-from the article
Anonymous
04/26/2019 18:38
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think if Howard wishes then it should ban dogs from its campus. One sees self entitled people who flout leash laws and don’t clean up after their dogs, whether I’m public parks or someone else’s private property.
That said, it seems that some of the students based on their comments have more of a problem with the color of ‘outsiders’ than with dogs on their campus
This exactly. Don’t want dog walkers on your campus, fine, post signs and enforce it. that makes total sense to me. But the students are basically saying white neighbors are “interlopers”. As if college campuses all over the country don’t have locals that use the campus spaces. Give me a break.
If white students talked this way about black neighbors they’d be called racists.
This
And if nearby black residents were walking around a predominantly white campus showing such wanton disrespect they would be locked up on sight. That's systemic racism which is significantly more pernicious than petty name-calling.
Sure....look up DC crime stats, my friend, and see what's actually going on in the real world vs. in your very fertile imagination.
What the hell does that have to do with black STUDENTS at predominantly white schools all across the country repeatedly getting stopped by campus police and asked to show ID? Do you honestly think black non-students walking around those campuses would tolerated? Do you honestly think they'd be simply disliked and called "interlopers"? You don't think there'd be countless incidents of black non-student dog-walkers ending up in handcuffs and in some instances in the hospital? You sitting here bent out of shape cause Howard students are irritated with the neighboring residents? Shyt I'd rather have students irritated with me than campus police putting a bullet in my ass just for being black.
The plain fact is that neither is right and neither should be tolerated. You are damn right black students have been mistreated. But that does not make what the Howard students are saying okay, either. It's all wrong. Varying degrees, sure, but still wrong.
What are the Howard students doing? It's private property. They don't want dog poop on it.
Not one person on this thread is arguing about that. Of course people need to keep their dogs out. It's about the "interloper" nonsense. This is about more than dogs.
Anonymous
04/26/2019 18:23
Subject: Open Campus: The debate over the use of Howard's campus by neighbors
Does anyone on this thread know what Howard University's current policy is about members of the public on campus? Does anyone know what HU's policy is about dogs on campus?