Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids graduated from W cluster, my youngest last year. I always thought MCPS was great and I didn't notice any recent changes. What is making families now reevaluate MCPS? Sincere question - I must have missed something, or it must've happened after my kids were out. Thanks.
People are (over-)reacting to the upcoming systemwide boundary analysis.
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/publicinfo/boundary-analysis/
Would you prefer parents under-react? I’d rather have over active community members anytime.
I would prefer that parents react to the consultant's actual report and any subsequent decisions MCPS may make.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids graduated from W cluster, my youngest last year. I always thought MCPS was great and I didn't notice any recent changes. What is making families now reevaluate MCPS? Sincere question - I must have missed something, or it must've happened after my kids were out. Thanks.
MCPS wants to even out the FARMS rate across all schools. Why should just a few have the burden to house the majority of high farms population. Parents are afraid it will reduce local school performance and negatively effect education of their children. Sounds like a reasonable concern to me. Some parents are also worried about decline in property value.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids graduated from W cluster, my youngest last year. I always thought MCPS was great and I didn't notice any recent changes. What is making families now reevaluate MCPS? Sincere question - I must have missed something, or it must've happened after my kids were out. Thanks.
People are (over-)reacting to the upcoming systemwide boundary analysis.
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/publicinfo/boundary-analysis/
Would you prefer parents under-react? I’d rather have over active community members anytime.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids graduated from W cluster, my youngest last year. I always thought MCPS was great and I didn't notice any recent changes. What is making families now reevaluate MCPS? Sincere question - I must have missed something, or it must've happened after my kids were out. Thanks.
People are (over-)reacting to the upcoming systemwide boundary analysis.
https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/departments/publicinfo/boundary-analysis/
Anonymous wrote:My kids graduated from W cluster, my youngest last year. I always thought MCPS was great and I didn't notice any recent changes. What is making families now reevaluate MCPS? Sincere question - I must have missed something, or it must've happened after my kids were out. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:My kids graduated from W cluster, my youngest last year. I always thought MCPS was great and I didn't notice any recent changes. What is making families now reevaluate MCPS? Sincere question - I must have missed something, or it must've happened after my kids were out. Thanks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so excited they’re getting rid of PARCC so there will be nothing left for GreatSchools to use to rank our 8-year-olds like race horses.
Yea and parents will actually have to step into the school to check it out and ask neighbors like the old days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You people just love white people
I don’t think it’s that at all. Look at some of the top performing schools and they aren’t all white. They have a high percentage of Asian and Indian kids.
Saying you just love rich and high scoring is more accurate.
No school in MCPS has high percentage of Indian kids. Indian concentration is in VA.
Um, you're wrong. Have you been to Clarksburg lately?
Not the PP, but claim was about high performing schools having high concentration of Indians. Clarkesburg is not really high performing.
Anonymous wrote:VA for us, and though it will help reduce our commute, it is the disaster that MCPS has become that is giving us the kick in the pants to leave
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so excited they’re getting rid of PARCC so there will be nothing left for GreatSchools to use to rank our 8-year-olds like race horses.
Yea and parents will actually have to step into the school to check it out and ask neighbors like the old days.
Nah, look at old fashioned indicators of FARMS, done.
I used to have a FARMS student who broke the trend, but now there won't be a way to tell anymore. Welcome to greater polarization of society.
Are you actually insinuating that:
1) You are/were an MCPS educator; and
2) In the totality of your career, you've only ever encountered one single child eligible for free and reduced meals who showed academic promise?
The problem is not the children. It is you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so excited they’re getting rid of PARCC so there will be nothing left for GreatSchools to use to rank our 8-year-olds like race horses.
Yea and parents will actually have to step into the school to check it out and ask neighbors like the old days.
Nah, look at old fashioned indicators of FARMS, done.
I used to have a FARMS student who broke the trend, but now there won't be a way to tell anymore. Welcome to greater polarization of society.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m so excited they’re getting rid of PARCC so there will be nothing left for GreatSchools to use to rank our 8-year-olds like race horses.
Yea and parents will actually have to step into the school to check it out and ask neighbors like the old days.
Anonymous wrote:I’m so excited they’re getting rid of PARCC so there will be nothing left for GreatSchools to use to rank our 8-year-olds like race horses.