Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, I'm the one that is admiring you for not dragging the kids earlier.
I'm curious why you're on here asking for a FWB and not testing the waters on sites like bumble? Being transparent goes far on these sites once you start communicating.
OP here: I asked if what I want is possible. I am not asking for a FWB here or going on sites. I am not divorced yet. When I am, I will look into those options.
It is very possible you will find numerous men who will SAY they won't see other women when you are unavailable.
But these very same men who would agree to this in the first place, will also be the same kind of men who would lie about it to get you in the sack.
You don't want to make a commitment, you say there is no chance of a commitment in the future.
No rational man has any reason whatsoever to agree to see you when it's convenient for you, and deny himself at least the option of seeing other women when you're unavailable.
If you don't want to have a relationship with the guy, then you don't get to ask for him to be exclusive, but if you do, and you're naive enough to believe guys who tell you they agree to it, you deserve exactly what you end up with--the bottom of the barrel--players.
Anonymous wrote:So the takeaway is men are liars. Well, duh.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP is expressing a strong emotional need for male validation in a relationship, which she isn't getting in her marriage, but her bad marriage has made her so resentful of men that she is simultaneously resisting the idea of a fulfilling emotional relationship with a new partner ever being possible.
The inherent conflict which appears between what she actually seems to want or need, and what she says she intends to seek, will not lead to a satisfactory relationship outcome for OP, regardless if it's just a temporary FWB, or something deeper.
Slow your roll, PP. She wants occasional sex and companionship, and has stated so multiple times. Sometimes I think the biggest myth perpetuated is that women are the needy ones.
Exactly the point. To validate her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it’s just the opposite.
People can’t handle a woman NOT needing a man, so attempt to shame her by telling her her needs are wrong and that she clearly is too dumb to understand her own wants. It’s when a woman ISNT emotional and needy and playing into the roles that make you comfortable that you start talking about how she’s actually unattractive and undesirable but is too dumb to know it.
It’s humorous.
+1. My takeaway from this thread is that there are 1 (maybe 2?) posters absolutely incensed that OP wants a man for occasional companionship and sex, and nothing else. She also wants it to be exclusive. So? I can think of all kinds of scenarios where this would work for the guy. The vitriol (and length of this thread) is telling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually think it’s just the opposite.
People can’t handle a woman NOT needing a man, so attempt to shame her by telling her her needs are wrong and that she clearly is too dumb to understand her own wants. It’s when a woman ISNT emotional and needy and playing into the roles that make you comfortable that you start talking about how she’s actually unattractive and undesirable but is too dumb to know it.
It’s humorous.
+1. My takeaway from this thread is that there are 1 (maybe 2?) posters absolutely incensed that OP wants a man for occasional companionship and sex, and nothing else. She also wants it to be exclusive. So? I can think of all kinds of scenarios where this would work for the guy. The vitriol (and length of this thread) is telling.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP is expressing a strong emotional need for male validation in a relationship, which she isn't getting in her marriage, but her bad marriage has made her so resentful of men that she is simultaneously resisting the idea of a fulfilling emotional relationship with a new partner ever being possible.
The inherent conflict which appears between what she actually seems to want or need, and what she says she intends to seek, will not lead to a satisfactory relationship outcome for OP, regardless if it's just a temporary FWB, or something deeper.
Slow your roll, PP. She wants occasional sex and companionship, and has stated so multiple times. Sometimes I think the biggest myth perpetuated is that women are the needy ones.
Exactly the point. To validate her.
Anonymous wrote:OP is expressing a strong emotional need for male validation in a relationship, which she isn't getting in her marriage, but her bad marriage has made her so resentful of men that she is simultaneously resisting the idea of a fulfilling emotional relationship with a new partner ever being possible.
The inherent conflict which appears between what she actually seems to want or need, and what she says she intends to seek, will not lead to a satisfactory relationship outcome for OP, regardless if it's just a temporary FWB, or something deeper.
Slow your roll, PP. She wants occasional sex and companionship, and has stated so multiple times. Sometimes I think the biggest myth perpetuated is that women are the needy ones.
OP is expressing a strong emotional need for male validation in a relationship, which she isn't getting in her marriage, but her bad marriage has made her so resentful of men that she is simultaneously resisting the idea of a fulfilling emotional relationship with a new partner ever being possible.
The inherent conflict which appears between what she actually seems to want or need, and what she says she intends to seek, will not lead to a satisfactory relationship outcome for OP, regardless if it's just a temporary FWB, or something deeper.
Anonymous wrote:I actually think it’s just the opposite.
People can’t handle a woman NOT needing a man, so attempt to shame her by telling her her needs are wrong and that she clearly is too dumb to understand her own wants. It’s when a woman ISNT emotional and needy and playing into the roles that make you comfortable that you start talking about how she’s actually unattractive and undesirable but is too dumb to know it.
It’s humorous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes but you sound like a man whore.
Look if you can go chase strange 4 nights a week that’s wonderful! You wouldn’t appeal to me.
No, it doesn't mean he will be "chasing strange 4 nights a week." It does mean he wants more sex than he is getting from his FWB, and if the opportunity arises from time to time, he will not consider himself foreclosed from purusing outside interests.
"Exclusive," which is what OP wants, means her FWB does not have sex with anyone else but her, EVER, during the entire course of their relationship.
It's amazing that some people don't actually understand what "exclusive" means.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP you need therapy. And so does the weirdo 43 yr old “rich” chick.
You need to spend time without a man and learn to resolve the emotional issues you are dealing with. No amount of sexing will make that go away.
You need to learn self love. Your children will never learn that if they don’t see you model it. Everything you’ve shared screams of low/no self worth. You do deserve so much better OP.
I agree with this.
OP is expressing a strong emotional need for male validation in a relationship, which she isn't getting in her marriage, but her bad marriage has made her so resentful of men that she is simultaneously resisting the idea of a fulfilling emotional relationship with a new partner ever being possible.
The inherent conflict which appears between what she actually seems to want or need, and what she says she intends to seek, will not lead to a satisfactory relationship outcome for OP, regardless if it's just a temporary FWB, or something deeper.