Anonymous wrote:Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
Shhh.......these people do not understand the difference between the refund and the tax bill. They think the refund is free money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here is what you fail to understand (or you do understand it, but refuse to admit it.... so you are either ignorant or obstinate, your choice).
Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
And your tax cut still hasn't helped the gdp. It certainly isn't helping the national debt.
We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.
I supposed you were not at all alarmed when Obama doubled our national debt, were you?
Less than a year ago, Mitch McConnell assured Americans that his $1.5 trillion program of tax cuts for billionaires and multinational corporations would not increase debts and deficits. “I not only don’t think it will increase the deficit, I think it will be beyond revenue neutral,” the Senate majority leader chirped. “In other words, I think it will produce more than enough to fill that gap.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here is what you fail to understand (or you do understand it, but refuse to admit it.... so you are either ignorant or obstinate, your choice).
Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
And your tax cut still hasn't helped the gdp. It certainly isn't helping the national debt.
We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.
I supposed you were not at all alarmed when Obama doubled our national debt, were you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here is what you fail to understand (or you do understand it, but refuse to admit it.... so you are either ignorant or obstinate, your choice).
Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
And your tax cut still hasn't helped the gdp. It certainly isn't helping the national debt.
We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem.
I supposed you were not at all alarmed when Obama doubled our national debt, were you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical. Note that these two articles on CNN were published 18 days apart.
![]()
“Hysterical” is you embarrassing yourself with your ignorance.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here is what you fail to understand (or you do understand it, but refuse to admit it.... so you are either ignorant or obstinate, your choice).
Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
And your tax cut still hasn't helped the gdp. It certainly isn't helping the national debt.
Anonymous wrote:
Here is what you fail to understand (or you do understand it, but refuse to admit it.... so you are either ignorant or obstinate, your choice).
Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical. Note that these two articles on CNN were published 18 days apart.
![]()
Most taxpayers received more money back on their monthly pay. So, naturally, their refund could be less. This is true for my family. We had approximately $400 more each month AND this year we get a refund.... we haven't had a refund for years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical. Note that these two articles on CNN were published 18 days apart.
![]()
OMG.. 40 whole dollars.. whoo hooo! I can pay for my costco membership now!
But seriously, the did say it was early.
Still hasn't help the GDP though, or all those farmers who now going banktrupt. MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:This is hysterical. Note that these two articles on CNN were published 18 days apart.
![]()

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 This doesn't mean that people are being more efficient about not overpaying the government during the year. It means they are paying more taxes, and the people who owe for the first time are in for a nasty shock.
No. Most are paying less.
Evidence, please.
Multiple studies published since tax reform. Look them up and don't be a moron, please.
You’re making the claim. Back it up.
First, I'm a different poster.
Second, YOU made the first claim. Back it up or at least engage intelligently.
I have made no claims in this thread for which I have not provided evidence.
What’s currently in dispute is the “No. Most are paying less.”
Again, evidence for that, please. There’s plenty backing up the opposite here.
First claim here is "It means they are paying more taxes, and the people who owe for the first time are in for a nasty shock."
Prove it.
Read the numerous links throughout this thread.
OK, then go read the multiple studies published during tax reform, saying that 60-70% people would pay less, 30% the same, 6-10% more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
+1 This doesn't mean that people are being more efficient about not overpaying the government during the year. It means they are paying more taxes, and the people who owe for the first time are in for a nasty shock.
No. Most are paying less.
Evidence, please.
Multiple studies published since tax reform. Look them up and don't be a moron, please.
You’re making the claim. Back it up.
First, I'm a different poster.
Second, YOU made the first claim. Back it up or at least engage intelligently.
I have made no claims in this thread for which I have not provided evidence.
What’s currently in dispute is the “No. Most are paying less.”
Again, evidence for that, please. There’s plenty backing up the opposite here.
First claim here is "It means they are paying more taxes, and the people who owe for the first time are in for a nasty shock."
Prove it.
Read the numerous links throughout this thread.