Anonymous wrote:While I can see the POV of the responses here that someone in their fifties should not waste their time on obtaining a law degree - Kim Kardashian is in her early-40’s & is pursuing a future career in law.
She has already passed the baby bar + is currently doing criminal advocacy work.
No one is criticizing her because of her being middle-aged and no one is saying that she is too old to be vying to be a bona fide attorney.
Could be because she still looks very young.
So if the OP looks a decade or so younger > then she too can be more successful in her future in law vs. her peers?!
Anonymous wrote:While I can see the POV of the responses here that someone in their fifties should not waste their time on obtaining a law degree - Kim Kardashian is in her early-40’s & is pursuing a future career in law.
She has already passed the baby bar + is currently doing criminal advocacy work.
No one is criticizing her because of her being middle-aged and no one is saying that she is too old to be vying to be a bona fide attorney.
Could be because she still looks very young.
So if the OP looks a decade or so younger > then she too can be more successful in her future in law vs. her peers?!
Anonymous wrote:While I can see the POV of the responses here that someone in their fifties should not waste their time on obtaining a law degree - Kim Kardashian is in her early-40’s & is pursuing a future career in law.
She has already passed the baby bar + is currently doing criminal advocacy work.
No one is criticizing her because of her being middle-aged and no one is saying that she is too old to be vying to be a bona fide attorney.
Could be because she still looks very young.
So if the OP looks a decade or so younger > then she too can be more successful in her future in law vs. her peers?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, this is the OP. I started this thread in 2018! It's closing on four years ago! I read through it because there was an encouraging post on it I liked and remembered.
For anyone curious, I had a family crisis, which derailed me for a while, but things are better now, and I'm going to school to become a paralegal. The classes are easy, and it seems interesting enough. I hope being a paralegal is more challenging. It's far too late for me to go to law school now, sadly, and I don't have the $300K it would cost to attend Georgetown or a similar school I would likely have attended in my 20s.
Re-reading this thread, it's surprising to see all the lawyers blithely accepting age discrimination as the way it is, while at the same time it's illegal discrimination, yes?
Doesn't your law license require you to uphold the law? You're all saying it's OK to break the law, and isn't that technically a violation of your license?
I don't know, just asking, as it seemed surprising from this perspective.
For real? Acknowledging age discrimination isn't the same as committing it. No one advised anyone to break the law. Saying that age discrimination is real and that it is unlikely to change fast enough for you isn't saying it's okay to break the law. Upholding the law doesn't mean that I, personally, have to bring age-discrimination suits against companies that discriminate (indeed, I would not have standing). I hope your critical reading and thinking skills improve as part of your coursework.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow, this is the OP. I started this thread in 2018! It's closing on four years ago! I read through it because there was an encouraging post on it I liked and remembered.
For anyone curious, I had a family crisis, which derailed me for a while, but things are better now, and I'm going to school to become a paralegal. The classes are easy, and it seems interesting enough. I hope being a paralegal is more challenging. It's far too late for me to go to law school now, sadly, and I don't have the $300K it would cost to attend Georgetown or a similar school I would likely have attended in my 20s.
Re-reading this thread, it's surprising to see all the lawyers blithely accepting age discrimination as the way it is, while at the same time it's illegal discrimination, yes?
Doesn't your law license require you to uphold the law? You're all saying it's OK to break the law, and isn't that technically a violation of your license?
I don't know, just asking, as it seemed surprising from this perspective.
OP, nobody sets out to discriminate. At least very few people do. It happens more in the "We need people who fit into our culture" type of environment.
Anonymous wrote:I've always wanted to go to law school. Got derailed after college into another career, then had kids and SAH for a lot of years. Kids in high school now, soon college. I can afford in-state tuition at local, not very prestigious law school, but would it be worth it to start now? I'd be almost 60 when finished -- what then? I took the practice LSAT and did very well on it, FWIW. I've always been interested in law and politics. I am healthy and hope to work into my 70s. Is this just a crazy idea? Will it be a waste of time/money? BTW, no one wants to hire me in my old field. I'm too old, skills too rusty. Age discrimination is alive and very well.[b]
Anonymous wrote:Wow, this is the OP. I started this thread in 2018! It's closing on four years ago! I read through it because there was an encouraging post on it I liked and remembered.
For anyone curious, I had a family crisis, which derailed me for a while, but things are better now, and I'm going to school to become a paralegal. The classes are easy, and it seems interesting enough. I hope being a paralegal is more challenging. It's far too late for me to go to law school now, sadly, and I don't have the $300K it would cost to attend Georgetown or a similar school I would likely have attended in my 20s.
Re-reading this thread, it's surprising to see all the lawyers blithely accepting age discrimination as the way it is, while at the same time it's illegal discrimination, yes?
Doesn't your law license require you to uphold the law? You're all saying it's OK to break the law, and isn't that technically a violation of your license?
I don't know, just asking, as it seemed surprising from this perspective.
Anonymous wrote:Wow, this is the OP. I started this thread in 2018! It's closing on four years ago! I read through it because there was an encouraging post on it I liked and remembered.
For anyone curious, I had a family crisis, which derailed me for a while, but things are better now, and I'm going to school to become a paralegal. The classes are easy, and it seems interesting enough. I hope being a paralegal is more challenging. It's far too late for me to go to law school now, sadly, and I don't have the $300K it would cost to attend Georgetown or a similar school I would likely have attended in my 20s.
Re-reading this thread, it's surprising to see all the lawyers blithely accepting age discrimination as the way it is, while at the same time it's illegal discrimination, yes?
Doesn't your law license require you to uphold the law? You're all saying it's OK to break the law, and isn't that technically a violation of your license?
I don't know, just asking, as it seemed surprising from this perspective.