Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it is her mouth. Her crowns are too big and it makes her mouth look funny and like she is struggling to articulate words. I feel a bit stressed watching her try to mange it.

That stress you feel is the discomfort of watching someone with no conscience.

Anonymous wrote:I think it is her mouth. Her crowns are too big and it makes her mouth look funny and like she is struggling to articulate words. I feel a bit stressed watching her try to mange it.

Anonymous wrote:Someone on this forum posted a great explanation on another Ivanka thread a few weeks ago (sorry, I can’t find it). It was basically that she’s the Republican’s version of a feminist: pretty, thin, quiet, dresses in skirts and dresses, speaks demurely, never takes the lead, etc. She can be a businesswoman as long as she behaves a certain way, always knowing not to upstage the men. I think there’s something to this argument.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

I didn’t start the thread.

And yet here you are, responding many times, never once addressing the original question at hand.

I started the thread because I wanted to dialogue about a particular phenomenon that I am experiencing. But by all means, you are welcome to pop in and out and in again to try to derail the original topic and spew shallow analyses and poorly written criticisms.

You wanted *to dialogue*?! Omg! Ivanka is that you? Are you trying to *architect* a new public image?

You know what - if using the word "dialogue" outs me as a dirty liberal and east coast elite, sign me up.

I *am* an architect, actually.

I don’t think using *dialogue* in the context you used exposes you as a liberal East Coast elite because this liberal East Coast elite is calling you out on it. I would never used dialogue as a verb, only a noun.

As an architect, do you wear black turtlenecks and cool glasses?

Anonymous wrote:OP, your jealousy and vanity are tormenting you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

I am the OP. I don't disagree with these statements, actually. What I am discussing is about something else entirely.

I am getting frustrated that most people trying to tear down this post and its sentiments are truly terrible at reading comprehension and analysis!

Thank you for responding to my post, OP. Not sure why you picked mine when there are so many others affirming your confirmation bias. Here is the thing. I have teenagers and I’m not going to willingly drag myslef into their world of over-analyzing stupidity when there are so many greater concerns in the world. She gives off good energy to me in the limited time I have thought about it and I legitimately don’t get the “darkness” from her.

Having said that, the entire blood diamond issue which has been around for centuries pisses me off.

OP again. Happy to respond to your post, and will respond to this one as well: it makes NO sense and I do not understand what you are trying to say, at all.

Okay, shorter: Don’t you have anything better to do?

This is so easy!

Couldn't the same be said for you?

I didn’t start the thread.

And yet here you are, responding many times, never once addressing the original question at hand.

I started the thread because I wanted to dialogue about a particular phenomenon that I am experiencing. But by all means, you are welcome to pop in and out and in again to try to derail the original topic and spew shallow analyses and poorly written criticisms.

You wanted *to dialogue*?! Omg! Ivanka is that you? Are you trying to *architect* a new public image?

You know what - if using the word "dialogue" outs me as a dirty liberal and east coast elite, sign me up.

I *am* an architect, actually.

Anonymous wrote:
You liberals did the same thing to Linda Tripp, matter of fact.

Anonymous wrote:She’s happy, well-educated, gorgeous, rich, a great mom, well-put together. I bet her closet is even beautiful.

Many people hate people whose feathers don’t get ruffled no matter how hard others try to ruffle them.

Melt down in 5, 4, 3, 2, 1....

Anonymous wrote:
Is Chelsea Clinton in the White House serving as a Senior Advisor to the President and representing the U.S. at multiple international events? Without any kind of security clearance? Please. The valid criticism of Ivanka Trump focuses on substance, not looks. The GOP would have impeached President Clinton before her inauguration if she had attempted 5% of the stuff Trump has gotten away with.

Anonymous wrote:

I disagree. I find her to be completely vapid in interviews and her book. She’s all style and no substance.