Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is definitely a tangent, but were any of these matriarchal societies agriculturally based? I read something about how the status of women in society was often harmed in places after the agricultural revolution took place. It had to do with owning and defending property and passing it along to heirs as well as treating women much like the the livestock they were now breeding.
These societies were in Asia and Africa. As far as I know there are no matriarchal societies in South America. Yes, some of these societies are agricultural. It doesn’t mean that the men have no power, just that land, property and family names are handed down through the woman’s side of the family. In some of these societies it is the mother’s brother who helps raise the children.
My personal view is that religion is the biggest determinant of whether a society is patriarchal.
Thanks. I tend to believe that the culture shapes the religion more than the religion shapes the culture. It's a feedback loop, of course, but religion is so malleable. I think a patriarchal society is not created by religion; rather, a patriarchal society will either adopt a patriarchal religion or shape its version of the religion into something oppressive to women.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
This is definitely a tangent, but were any of these matriarchal societies agriculturally based? I read something about how the status of women in society was often harmed in places after the agricultural revolution took place. It had to do with owning and defending property and passing it along to heirs as well as treating women much like the the livestock they were now breeding.
These societies were in Asia and Africa. As far as I know there are no matriarchal societies in South America. Yes, some of these societies are agricultural. It doesn’t mean that the men have no power, just that land, property and family names are handed down through the woman’s side of the family. In some of these societies it is the mother’s brother who helps raise the children.
My personal view is that religion is the biggest determinant of whether a society is patriarchal.
Anonymous wrote:I can't believe it. I'm already tired and bored of the issue.
Bring on the next entertaining cause/terrorist attack/natural disaster!!
Anonymous wrote:While all of this is disturbing, I am saddened at how many very young girls were harassed and groped at 13 and younger. That’s not harassment, it’s pedophilia. There is no age where harassment of another is “acceptable” but the assaulting of children, of either gender, is a crime.
Anonymous wrote:The news needs a victim-centered non-story to obsess over. Last year, it was people who beileve they are not the sex they were born. Now it’s this.
Ignore. This, too, shall pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that the majority of sexual harassment claims are legit. Unfortunately, you do have the occasional nutcase or opportunist that complains to HR over something that no reasonable person would consider harassment. When this happens, word spreads among men, which tends to make them skeptical of harassment claims.
A study I read from a few years ago estimated that 97% of sexual assault claims are true and 3% are fabricated.
Anonymous wrote:
This is definitely a tangent, but were any of these matriarchal societies agriculturally based? I read something about how the status of women in society was often harmed in places after the agricultural revolution took place. It had to do with owning and defending property and passing it along to heirs as well as treating women much like the the livestock they were now breeding.
Anonymous wrote:
It’s much more complicated than that. In matriarchal societies women don’t need to use their “sexual powers to get perks”.
. . .
Other studies have looked at the confidence of girls and women in matriarchal societies and found that they have equal confidence in their decision making as males. By contrast, the more patriarchal the society, the less confidence females had in their decisions compared to males.
I can see how in a society where women have less power, they would use their sexuality to influence the males that do. It would also make sense that lower status males would try to elevate their status by putting females down below them.