Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are an idiot. The country already has debt as big as the gdp. How does giving tax cuts reduce debt/deficit? It will make US like Greece in the long run.
Why hasn't any tax cuts produced the growth that replaces the lost revenue due to tax cuts? It only increases deficit. Can you name any time when this happened? Reagan? Or two bushes? With bushes left the economy in a recession. Bush squandered the Clinton surplus in 8 years.
There was no Clinton surplus. All the numbers:
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
Can you show some credible source or an acclaimed economist who says so? Also where is the promised economic growth that that is supposed to reduce deficit? Both Bush and Reagan promised economic growth will compensate the loss of revenue due to tax cuts. People like you can never make a case with numbers and facts. But you keep parroting the same tax cuts for the rich. The debt is already more than the GDP. This country is heading for a collapse of the Dollar if we don’t reduce the deficit during god times. Smart nations reduce the deficit during good economic times so when times go bad we spend to stimulate the economy. China, Germany, India etc have much lower debt to GDP ratio. Guess why they are the ones controlling the global trade?
Ahhh, I see you don't like math and numbers. Too bad. Deal with it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
What? You know nothing about me but assume all kinds of things. You are not that smart because smart people don’t make assumptions and talk about violence. Only the mentally impotent in a state of delusions threaten violence.
I pay a very high tax rate as an UMC professional and I want the rich to pay for their fair share too. I don’t like to subsidize the wealthy.
You don't pay shit. You're a taker.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Can you show some credible source or an acclaimed economist who says so? Also where is the promised economic growth that that is supposed to reduce deficit? Both Bush and Reagan promised economic growth will compensate the loss of revenue due to tax cuts. People like you can never make a case with numbers and facts. But you keep parroting the same tax cuts for the rich. The debt is already more than the GDP. This country is heading for a collapse of the Dollar if we don’t reduce the deficit during god times. Smart nations reduce the deficit during good economic times so when times go bad we spend to stimulate the economy. China, Germany, India etc have much lower debt to GDP ratio. Guess why they are the ones controlling the global trade?
What's this WE shit? You don't do a damn thing except demand others pay for what you want.
Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
What? You know nothing about me but assume all kinds of things. You are not that smart because smart people don’t make assumptions and talk about violence. Only the mentally impotent in a state of delusions threaten violence.
I pay a very high tax rate as an UMC professional and I want the rich to pay for their fair share too. I don’t like to subsidize the wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:
We pay plenty, yet most of it goes into the black holes of the DOD war machine, contractors scamming the USG, and ludicrously overpriced medical care. Everyone is scamming their fellow citizens. Personally, I don't think it bodes well for the health of this country. And yet, we now have a tax bill take quite literally takes from middle class constituencies to pay for massive tax breaks for the wealthiest. I hope you decide to get violent about that tax increase. If not, why not?
Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
Anonymous wrote:
Can you show some credible source or an acclaimed economist who says so? Also where is the promised economic growth that that is supposed to reduce deficit? Both Bush and Reagan promised economic growth will compensate the loss of revenue due to tax cuts. People like you can never make a case with numbers and facts. But you keep parroting the same tax cuts for the rich. The debt is already more than the GDP. This country is heading for a collapse of the Dollar if we don’t reduce the deficit during god times. Smart nations reduce the deficit during good economic times so when times go bad we spend to stimulate the economy. China, Germany, India etc have much lower debt to GDP ratio. Guess why they are the ones controlling the global trade?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are an idiot. The country already has debt as big as the gdp. How does giving tax cuts reduce debt/deficit? It will make US like Greece in the long run.
Why hasn't any tax cuts produced the growth that replaces the lost revenue due to tax cuts? It only increases deficit. Can you name any time when this happened? Reagan? Or two bushes? With bushes left the economy in a recession. Bush squandered the Clinton surplus in 8 years.
There was no Clinton surplus. All the numbers:
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
Can you show some credible source or an acclaimed economist who says so? Also where is the promised economic growth that that is supposed to reduce deficit? Both Bush and Reagan promised economic growth will compensate the loss of revenue due to tax cuts. People like you can never make a case with numbers and facts. But you keep parroting the same tax cuts for the rich. The debt is already more than the GDP. This country is heading for a collapse of the Dollar if we don’t reduce the deficit during god times. Smart nations reduce the deficit during good economic times so when times go bad we spend to stimulate the economy. China, Germany, India etc have much lower debt to GDP ratio. Guess why they are the ones controlling the global trade?
Anonymous wrote:I don't want to take America back to the 50's. I want you to start paying for what you want instead of wishing for stuff and demanding others pay for it.
And oh, BTW, I'm willing to get quite violent over this. You're not going to walk all over other people because you feel "entitled" to their earnings and property.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You are an idiot. The country already has debt as big as the gdp. How does giving tax cuts reduce debt/deficit? It will make US like Greece in the long run.
Why hasn't any tax cuts produced the growth that replaces the lost revenue due to tax cuts? It only increases deficit. Can you name any time when this happened? Reagan? Or two bushes? With bushes left the economy in a recession. Bush squandered the Clinton surplus in 8 years.
There was no Clinton surplus. All the numbers:
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus
http://www.craigsteiner.us/articles/16
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, Hillary in her $20,000 Armani jackets talking about the plight of the poor. Now THAT'S rich.![]()
As opposed to the billionaire who bilked everyone he could.
He spent about 40% of what she did and he killed her. I wish I could have been in the room the night she lost and lost it!
"It was my turn... I deserved it... I was the one...how dare Donald take it from me!!!" hahaha![]()
![]()
What? She won by 3 million votes. But we live in a country , the only country in the world , where elections are conducted to pick the loser to be president due to slavery era EC. The GOP has only won the popular vote 1/7 recent elections and even that one time by one state in 2004. How long can this tenuous EC win continue? How long will people affected by CLimate change keep quiet? How long will people tolerate taking money from the middle and upper middle and giving it to the rich? How long will the diverse nation tolerate the racism and white supremacists?
People like you are on the losing side of history. You can’t change the direction the country is heading. You can’t take America back to the 1950s. You can’t wish away the rise of china. You can’t always get more than your fair share of global wealth. You can’t be a protectionist and grow because we will be isolated. If we shy away from competition it doesn’t mean others will pack and go.