Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
This thread has officially been derailed, but I prefer the humor over the stupid Spirit vs FCV banter.
Damn! Why did you do this?!?!! I successfully got them fighting in a new thread---and you have to bring it up?! I give up!
Hey, *I* started that thread!
And now I know why CCL exists, which is a valuable piece of knowledge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
This thread has officially been derailed, but I prefer the humor over the stupid Spirit vs FCV banter.
Damn! Why did you do this?!?!! I successfully got them fighting in a new thread---and you have to bring it up?! I give up!
Hey, *I* started that thread!
And now I know why CCL exists, which is a valuable piece of knowledge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
This thread has officially been derailed, but I prefer the humor over the stupid Spirit vs FCV banter.
Damn! Why did you do this?!?!! I successfully got them fighting in a new thread---and you have to bring it up?! I give up!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
This thread has officially been derailed, but I prefer the humor over the stupid Spirit vs FCV banter.
Who cares what you prefer. Public forum silly child
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
This thread has officially been derailed, but I prefer the humor over the stupid Spirit vs FCV banter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
This thread has officially been derailed, but I prefer the humor over the stupid Spirit vs FCV banter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Y'all are so naive. The reason for CCL using the club v club league format is to allow the soccer swingers network to have numbers every weekend. Its clearly not for the soccer. And the lack of a pro/rel policy is only to keep the hotter moms in circulation. Everybody knows that.
Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Anonymous wrote:I banged the CCL Guy and he told me BRYC was better than VYS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just wondering people's thoughts on blowouts in travel soccer. Is it appropriate for the other team to run up the score.
In Rec, the coaches get a lot of grief from the league for blowouts where the score is more than 6 goals apart. But in travel, since it is travel (and top teams) do different rules apply?
They shouldn't, but we have seen many, many complete blowouts in regular season play with not too much attempt to damper them.
When my husband coached, he would have the kids complete a long set of passes before anyone was allowed to shoot---or only use non-dominant foot. Kids were played out of position---goalie at striker, etc.
I've seen it backfire and become more humiliating---like when every kid on the winning side is saying really loudly 'guys we can't score, etc'. OR--kids going right up to opposing goal and then turning around and dribbling back.
At the littlest ages---there should be some type of mercy rule.
IN TOURNAMENT PLAY---completely different standard since goal differential is important. But---tournaments are, for the most part, better matched up teams.
I actually think that a X number of passes makes no sense. Usually the team that is getting whopped isn't pressing anyway, so the backs play a couple of passes back and forth to each other. If they don't, I think it causes bad habits anyway. I think the losing team adding a player if allowed is best. The winning team could remove a player. I agree to have the better players play GK and/or defense, things like that. You still want the kids to try and make good decisions, you just want it harder for them. Another is to back the press off and try to win the ball in your defensive half and, when you do, play the GK and start from the GK.
i completely agree with removing/adding a player. I don't know why this isn't done. Why not work it out so that everyone is challenged??
Anonymous wrote:Who here has had a crush on the parent of another child and actually made a move? Like, not a overtly sexual move, just a "the players can hang out at my place and you're welcome as well" kind thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Just wondering people's thoughts on blowouts in travel soccer. Is it appropriate for the other team to run up the score.
In Rec, the coaches get a lot of grief from the league for blowouts where the score is more than 6 goals apart. But in travel, since it is travel (and top teams) do different rules apply?
They shouldn't, but we have seen many, many complete blowouts in regular season play with not too much attempt to damper them.
When my husband coached, he would have the kids complete a long set of passes before anyone was allowed to shoot---or only use non-dominant foot. Kids were played out of position---goalie at striker, etc.
I've seen it backfire and become more humiliating---like when every kid on the winning side is saying really loudly 'guys we can't score, etc'. OR--kids going right up to opposing goal and then turning around and dribbling back.
At the littlest ages---there should be some type of mercy rule.
IN TOURNAMENT PLAY---completely different standard since goal differential is important. But---tournaments are, for the most part, better matched up teams.
I actually think that a X number of passes makes no sense. Usually the team that is getting whopped isn't pressing anyway, so the backs play a couple of passes back and forth to each other. If they don't, I think it causes bad habits anyway. I think the losing team adding a player if allowed is best. The winning team could remove a player. I agree to have the better players play GK and/or defense, things like that. You still want the kids to try and make good decisions, you just want it harder for them. Another is to back the press off and try to win the ball in your defensive half and, when you do, play the GK and start from the GK.