Anonymous wrote:Early college means early trade in a sense. It means earning credits towards completion of a two year community college program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like overcrowding is a sort of code word.
I'm not so sure. Most of the overcrowding is being driven by non affordable housing but rather by the 1 percenters' progeny. Most recognize this fact. Problem is we have no way to control by-right development, so the only way some can think to slow growth down until infrastructure catches up is by slowing down on the AH density, because that we CAN control. Also, some think the money that's being directed to things like AH, public art, tax abatement for seniors, etc., needs to be diverted, temporarily, to schools. If the superintendent weren't talking about distance learning/shift scheduling as a solution to this capacity crisis, I doubt parents would be so upset. But this seems to be the current plan, and it's a bitter pill to swallow if you've just spent your life savings so that you could live in this supposedly "good" school system.
Are they really still talking about distance learning/shift scheduling? I recall that coming up in one document a long time ago and online classes getting low marks in a survey. I've been following the issue and haven't heard it actually being promoted in a long time. It seems like some 4th high school advocates have latched on to it as a scare tactic. I agree we need a 4th HS and was glad to see it explicitly advocated in the motion on HS seats. I don't have the impression that shifts and lots of online classes are seriously under consideration.
Yes, they are still talking about this, just using more sophisticated language. Early college? Remember I warned you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like overcrowding is a sort of code word.
I'm not so sure. Most of the overcrowding is being driven by non affordable housing but rather by the 1 percenters' progeny. Most recognize this fact. Problem is we have no way to control by-right development, so the only way some can think to slow growth down until infrastructure catches up is by slowing down on the AH density, because that we CAN control. Also, some think the money that's being directed to things like AH, public art, tax abatement for seniors, etc., needs to be diverted, temporarily, to schools. If the superintendent weren't talking about distance learning/shift scheduling as a solution to this capacity crisis, I doubt parents would be so upset. But this seems to be the current plan, and it's a bitter pill to swallow if you've just spent your life savings so that you could live in this supposedly "good" school system.
Are they really still talking about distance learning/shift scheduling? I recall that coming up in one document a long time ago and online classes getting low marks in a survey. I've been following the issue and haven't heard it actually being promoted in a long time. It seems like some 4th high school advocates have latched on to it as a scare tactic. I agree we need a 4th HS and was glad to see it explicitly advocated in the motion on HS seats. I don't have the impression that shifts and lots of online classes are seriously under consideration.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like overcrowding is a sort of code word.
I'm not so sure. Most of the overcrowding is being driven by non affordable housing but rather by the 1 percenters' progeny. Most recognize this fact. Problem is we have no way to control by-right development, so the only way some can think to slow growth down until infrastructure catches up is by slowing down on the AH density, because that we CAN control. Also, some think the money that's being directed to things like AH, public art, tax abatement for seniors, etc., needs to be diverted, temporarily, to schools. If the superintendent weren't talking about distance learning/shift scheduling as a solution to this capacity crisis, I doubt parents would be so upset. But this seems to be the current plan, and it's a bitter pill to swallow if you've just spent your life savings so that you could live in this supposedly "good" school system.
Are they really still talking about distance learning/shift scheduling? I recall that coming up in one document a long time ago and online classes getting low marks in a survey. I've been following the issue and haven't heard it actually being promoted in a long time. It seems like some 4th high school advocates have latched on to it as a scare tactic. I agree we need a 4th HS and was glad to see it explicitly advocated in the motion on HS seats. I don't have the impression that shifts and lots of online classes are seriously under consideration.
Anonymous wrote:Online learning is frankly the most efficient of all of the options. And its still very much on the table.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like overcrowding is a sort of code word.
I'm not so sure. Most of the overcrowding is being driven by non affordable housing but rather by the 1 percenters' progeny. Most recognize this fact. Problem is we have no way to control by-right development, so the only way some can think to slow growth down until infrastructure catches up is by slowing down on the AH density, because that we CAN control. Also, some think the money that's being directed to things like AH, public art, tax abatement for seniors, etc., needs to be diverted, temporarily, to schools. If the superintendent weren't talking about distance learning/shift scheduling as a solution to this capacity crisis, I doubt parents would be so upset. But this seems to be the current plan, and it's a bitter pill to swallow if you've just spent your life savings so that you could live in this supposedly "good" school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like overcrowding is a sort of code word.
I'm not so sure. Most of the overcrowding is being driven by non affordable housing but rather by the 1 percenters' progeny. Most recognize this fact. Problem is we have no way to control by-right development, so the only way some can think to slow growth down until infrastructure catches up is by slowing down on the AH density, because that we CAN control. Also, some think the money that's being directed to things like AH, public art, tax abatement for seniors, etc., needs to be diverted, temporarily, to schools. If the superintendent weren't talking about distance learning/shift scheduling as a solution to this capacity crisis, I doubt parents would be so upset. But this seems to be the current plan, and it's a bitter pill to swallow if you've just spent your life savings so that you could live in this supposedly "good" school system.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AH really has nothing to do with the problem. There are too many kids and not enough schools and no one wants their kids to go to school with the poors. There is nothing harmful about going to school with the poors. And if people would just accept that fact, this overcrowding problem could be solved in 5 minutes.
No, because south Arlington is crowded too. It's no like there is tons of room on the south side.
Anonymous wrote:AH really has nothing to do with the problem. There are too many kids and not enough schools and no one wants their kids to go to school with the poors. There is nothing harmful about going to school with the poors. And if people would just accept that fact, this overcrowding problem could be solved in 5 minutes.
Anonymous wrote:I feel like overcrowding is a sort of code word.