Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the righteous people here judging this woman and her partner for giving two children a loving and stable home can DIAF.
+1 - how dare you people judge this woman. she is giving children happy homes - which is more than i can say for many younger, healthy parents
Look into the history of why there are age restrictions on adoption.
Also, the "how dare you" is over the top. There were plenty of happy homes that desperately wanted these children and the parents were much younger and healthier.
How do you know the specifics of Kotb's adoptions? There could be undisclosed facts that would have made the girls less "adoptable" but Kotb's resources make those issues easier to mitigate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the righteous people here judging this woman and her partner for giving two children a loving and stable home can DIAF.
+1 - how dare you people judge this woman. she is giving children happy homes - which is more than i can say for many younger, healthy parents
Look into the history of why there are age restrictions on adoption.
Also, the "how dare you" is over the top. There were plenty of happy homes that desperately wanted these children and the parents were much younger and healthier.
Anonymous wrote:Where's the scorn for Andy Cohen who's 50 and just became a father? He didn't even adopt, but used a surrogate and isn't in a relationship. At least Kotb's taken children who need a home. It isn't that I care either way, but if we're going to beat up Kotb about adopting, then Cohen seems like fair game.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the righteous people here judging this woman and her partner for giving two children a loving and stable home can DIAF.
+1 - how dare you people judge this woman. she is giving children happy homes - which is more than i can say for many younger, healthy parents
Look into the history of why there are age restrictions on adoption.
Also, the "how dare you" is over the top. There were plenty of happy homes that desperately wanted these children and the parents were much younger and healthier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:All the righteous people here judging this woman and her partner for giving two children a loving and stable home can DIAF.
+1 - how dare you people judge this woman. she is giving children happy homes - which is more than i can say for many younger, healthy parents
Anonymous wrote:All the righteous people here judging this woman and her partner for giving two children a loving and stable home can DIAF.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I actually had to turn it off when she announced this. I don’t have a problem with the age, but I do think she was able to get a newborn so quickly due to money. Also, she’s must work 60-70 hrs a week and when could she see the baby other than sleeping.
We do not know the circumstances of the adoption. However, she’s using her wealth to HELP children who could possibly be lost in the foster system and giving them a life that many children in the US could never hope to have. Most parents these days work long hours and hardly see their children, but somehow those children manage to survive. I’m sure Hoda can afford a nanny or two, or she may reduce her workload. Why would you have a problem with this?
Those are very young kids. There are plenty of families available to adopt them. She will no the parenting them and she will work long hours. The issue is her age and she may not make it till their 18th birthday.
And if she doesn’t that won’t make them love her any less. She’s providing an amazing life to two little ones. Young parents die every day. Stop taking away from her special moment. I hope she inspires more people to adopt especially those with so much wealth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks like she is in great health, probably has financial stability/to great wealth. George Clooney is 55. Are you questioning his ability to parent twins??
Different poster. She is a breast cancer survivor-that is the only part of her health she has shared as far as I know. She and her partner are both over 50. People like to say things anyone can get cancer, dementia, die, etc, but her chances are much higher than a person in her 30s. Everyone thinks it's fabulous until the odds catch up with them and then you have a child who could have gone to younger parents who is rich but having to go to guardian while dealing with very ill or dying parents if luck isn't on their side. This is not all or nothing. It's about odds. The odds of her staying healthy until they are full fledged adults are lower and money is the only reason she got to adopted a healthy baby at an advanced age.
So what? Everyone's life chances are different. People these days can live up to a 100. 52 isn't old IMO.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where's the scorn for Andy Cohen who's 50 and just became a father? He didn't even adopt, but used a surrogate and isn't in a relationship. At least Kotb's taken children who need a home. It isn't that I care either way, but if we're going to beat up Kotb about adopting, then Cohen seems like fair game.
Boom!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks like she is in great health, probably has financial stability/to great wealth. George Clooney is 55. Are you questioning his ability to parent twins??
Different poster. She is a breast cancer survivor-that is the only part of her health she has shared as far as I know. She and her partner are both over 50. People like to say things anyone can get cancer, dementia, die, etc, but her chances are much higher than a person in her 30s. Everyone thinks it's fabulous until the odds catch up with them and then you have a child who could have gone to younger parents who is rich but having to go to guardian while dealing with very ill or dying parents if luck isn't on their side. This is not all or nothing. It's about odds. The odds of her staying healthy until they are full fledged adults are lower and money is the only reason she got to adopted a healthy baby at an advanced age.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She looks like she is in great health, probably has financial stability/to great wealth. George Clooney is 55. Are you questioning his ability to parent twins??
Different poster. She is a breast cancer survivor-that is the only part of her health she has shared as far as I know. She and her partner are both over 50. People like to say things anyone can get cancer, dementia, die, etc, but her chances are much higher than a person in her 30s. Everyone thinks it's fabulous until the odds catch up with them and then you have a child who could have gone to younger parents who is rich but having to go to guardian while dealing with very ill or dying parents if luck isn't on their side. This is not all or nothing. It's about odds. The odds of her staying healthy until they are full fledged adults are lower and money is the only reason she got to adopted a healthy baby at an advanced age.
Anonymous wrote:Where's the scorn for Andy Cohen who's 50 and just became a father? He didn't even adopt, but used a surrogate and isn't in a relationship. At least Kotb's taken children who need a home. It isn't that I care either way, but if we're going to beat up Kotb about adopting, then Cohen seems like fair game.