Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?
the person who doesn't participate is the one that judges what is strong.
yeah, I have a strong objection to saying "Please" and "Thank you" - that is MY right!
So you equate a pledge of allegiance to common courtesy? Ooooooookay.
You don't appreciate saying the pledge of allegiance to our country. Maybe I don't think I should have to say "Please" or "Thank you" to a person that I don't appreciate or hold in great contempt.
You...don't have to say Please or Thank You. You do you.
But will you think I'm a jerk when you do something nice - like a hold a door, offer me a cookie, pick my kid up from school for me, etc - and I choose not to say "thank you"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess that physicians are allowed to opt out of the Hippocratic oath, too?
Sure. But it's up to the med school to decide if they still graduate.
O.k. so there are possibly some pretty big consequences (not graduating!) for NOT saying the Hippocratic oath. Is that fair? Or do you think that physicians who aren't feeling it shouldn't have to say it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?
the person who doesn't participate is the one that judges what is strong.
yeah, I have a strong objection to saying "Please" and "Thank you" - that is MY right!
So you equate a pledge of allegiance to common courtesy? Ooooooookay.
You don't appreciate saying the pledge of allegiance to our country. Maybe I don't think I should have to say "Please" or "Thank you" to a person that I don't appreciate or hold in great contempt.
You...don't have to say Please or Thank You. You do you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I guess that physicians are allowed to opt out of the Hippocratic oath, too?
Sure. But it's up to the med school to decide if they still graduate.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?
the person who doesn't participate is the one that judges what is strong.
yeah, I have a strong objection to saying "Please" and "Thank you" - that is MY right!
So you equate a pledge of allegiance to common courtesy? Ooooooookay.
You don't appreciate saying the pledge of allegiance to our country. Maybe I don't think I should have to say "Please" or "Thank you" to a person that I don't appreciate or hold in great contempt.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?
the person who doesn't participate is the one that judges what is strong.
yeah, I have a strong objection to saying "Please" and "Thank you" - that is MY right!
So you equate a pledge of allegiance to common courtesy? Ooooooookay.
Anonymous wrote:I guess that physicians are allowed to opt out of the Hippocratic oath, too?
Anonymous wrote:The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
Agree. My problem is why they do not want to say the pledge. Sure, they have the right not to do so, but I also have the right to have an opinion. I find it very sad that people do not feel pride in saying the pledge. Like your president or not, this is still your country and is protecting your right not to say it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?
the person who doesn't participate is the one that judges what is strong.
yeah, I have a strong objection to saying "Please" and "Thank you" - that is MY right!
Anonymous wrote:The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
Agree. My problem is why they do not want to say the pledge. Sure, they have the right not to do so, but I also have the right to have an opinion. I find it very sad that people do not feel pride in saying the pledge. Like your president or not, this is still your country and is protecting your right not to say it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?
the person who doesn't participate is the one that judges what is strong.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
For one, are you sure the teacher is an American?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one is saying it is. If you read the OP, the suggestion was that NOT saying the pledge was an outrage. No one on this thread has argued that teachers/children/anyone should be prohibited from saying the pledge.
But, some people seem to take pride in not saying it--that is what is sad.
Think of all those young men landing on the beaches in Normandy..........
Random reference to WWII...ok?? But generally our armed forces fight to protect our freedoms, including free speech. It's sad that people don't understand that because it's such a fundamental part of the US history and identity.
The highlighted portion. DH spent 26 years in the military, got to deploy to some lovely garden spots, and the primary reason he served was to protect and defend the Constitution. While he was active duty he carried a pocket sized Constitution with him, as a reminder. If a teacher or student doesn't want to say the pledge, that is OK. Forcing them to say the pledge is wrong.
No one can force us to say the pledge, or sing the Happy Birthday song or even say "Here" during roll call. But unless you have a strong personal/religious reason for not doing so, why not participate?
Why do you need a "strong personal/religious reason"? And who is to judge what is "strong"?