Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."
Sister Joan Chittister
The whole pro-birth argument is stupid. There are laws protecting a child from the minute it is born. There are no laws protecting them from their "mothers" before that. That's why people are pro-life.
Anonymous wrote:Bc I got pregnant at 19 while in an abusive relationship and am thankful that PP was around so I was not tied to that awful guy forever.
Anonymous wrote:Bc I got pregnant at 19 while in an abusive relationship and am thankful that PP was around so I was not tied to that awful guy forever.
Anonymous wrote:Help me understand.
I am a middle class 30 year old married woman. I am pro-life but believe in abortion for extreme circumstances such as rape, health of the mother being in danger and possibly fetus abnormalities. I pray and wish to never have to make this horrible decision in my life.
As such, I do not understand why this is such a widespread issue. For most everyday people...they will not have to hopefully deal with it. We don;t all want to abort as a plan B now do we?[/quote]
"Hey, if my BC fails, no bigs, I'll just pop in for an abortion . . ." To be clear -NO ONE- wants this. It's not like people look forward to abortions. It isn't pleasant on any front.
If you're pro-life and want to prevent abortion, free or very low cost access to BC and family planning clinics should be high on your priority. That is effective. Banning abortion is not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
What is frivolous to you in your life may not be frivolous to someone else in their life. Why is this so complicated for you to understand? It's my body. It's my damn choice. Not yours. You worry about what you do, and I'll worry about what I do. I hate that anyone else thinks they know my life or can dictate what I should / shouldn't be able to do with my body. And yes, I do hate pro-lifers because for the life of me, I cannot understand why you can't keep your business out of the lives of others.
+1
+2
Legislating other people's bodies is beyond freaky and weird to me. Why do you CARE if a woman who, lets be honest you wouldn't lift a finger to help, gets an abortion? If these women who shouldn't have babies had them you'd then crap all over their bad mothering and claim to feel sorry for their kids and say some people shouldn't be parents.
It doesn't hurt you or affect you in any way if another woman aborts a pregnancy. You know tons of women who have had one but you don't even know you know because it didn't affect you in the slightest. You are no worse off for it happening. But she might be much BETTER off. You might personally think it's wrong because your hoodoo book told you so but too bad. Luckily for you it's not your body or your baby so it's not your problem.
Yes. The above was a really good post.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
What is frivolous to you in your life may not be frivolous to someone else in their life. Why is this so complicated for you to understand? It's my body. It's my damn choice. Not yours. You worry about what you do, and I'll worry about what I do. I hate that anyone else thinks they know my life or can dictate what I should / shouldn't be able to do with my body. And yes, I do hate pro-lifers because for the life of me, I cannot understand why you can't keep your business out of the lives of others.
+1
+2
Legislating other people's bodies is beyond freaky and weird to me. Why do you CARE if a woman who, lets be honest you wouldn't lift a finger to help, gets an abortion? If these women who shouldn't have babies had them you'd then crap all over their bad mothering and claim to feel sorry for their kids and say some people shouldn't be parents.
It doesn't hurt you or affect you in any way if another woman aborts a pregnancy. You know tons of women who have had one but you don't even know you know because it didn't affect you in the slightest. You are no worse off for it happening. But she might be much BETTER off. You might personally think it's wrong because your hoodoo book told you so but too bad. Luckily for you it's not your body or your baby so it's not your problem.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I totally agree with you- I think it should be available in cases of abnormalities, rape of a young child etc. . I think it is personal b/c
a) its been marketed to women that they carry and bring life so they should be at the forefront of protecting children born and unborn b) Most importantly a lot of people believe that a child within the womb is just as much a person as one outside the womb and it is murder to end that life in the same way that it is murder to throw an hours old infant in a trash dumpster. Logically they are completely correct and it is gross that abortion of a 4 month fetus is used as birth control to the extent that it is.
I also belong to a faith that says that the soul enters the fetus, not the embryo , so at the beginning of the 2nd trimester and that an embryo as well as an egg or sperm carry the potential for life but are not human. We also don't permit artificial insemination by a man other than one's husband or surrugacy so each faith has its own guidelines and these are very strong. I think that its good that women who begin life begins at conception follow through on that but I think that there has to be just as a push for the welfare of those children and mothers after birth as well and also universal coverage and access, in fact a push, for birth control for couples who will not be be able raise their children independently.
I just think abortion is a serious medical procedure that should be only used as a last resort in horrible unfathomable circumstances and not as a "Oh shit! I forgot my birth control again!" plan B.
Woman hate to hear this but pregnancy and sex is a big deal. Couples should have sex carefully with the knowledge that there is a very real chance of getting pregnant. Do not punish a poor unborn child because of your bad choices.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."
Sister Joan Chittister
The whole pro-birth argument is stupid. There are laws protecting a child from the minute it is born. There are no laws protecting them from their "mothers" before that. That's why people are pro-life.
Anonymous wrote:"I do not believe that just because you're opposed to abortion, that that makes you pro-life. In fact, I think in many cases, your morality is deeply lacking if all you want is a child born but not a child fed, not a child educated, not a child housed. And why would I think that you don't? Because you don't want any tax money to go there. That's not pro-life. That's pro-birth. We need a much broader conversation on what the morality of pro-life is."
Sister Joan Chittister
Anonymous wrote:I totally agree with you- I think it should be available in cases of abnormalities, rape of a young child etc. . I think it is personal b/c
a) its been marketed to women that they carry and bring life so they should be at the forefront of protecting children born and unborn b) Most importantly a lot of people believe that a child within the womb is just as much a person as one outside the womb and it is murder to end that life in the same way that it is murder to throw an hours old infant in a trash dumpster. Logically they are completely correct and it is gross that abortion of a 4 month fetus is used as birth control to the extent that it is.
I also belong to a faith that says that the soul enters the fetus, not the embryo , so at the beginning of the 2nd trimester and that an embryo as well as an egg or sperm carry the potential for life but are not human. We also don't permit artificial insemination by a man other than one's husband or surrugacy so each faith has its own guidelines and these are very strong. I think that its good that women who begin life begins at conception follow through on that but I think that there has to be just as a push for the welfare of those children and mothers after birth as well and also universal coverage and access, in fact a push, for birth control for couples who will not be be able raise their children independently.